Minnesota Golden Gophers at UCLA Bruins
Saturday, October 12th 2024 (9:00 PM EDT)
Minnesota -3.5 (39.0) (-166) Open: -4.5
Minnesota 21 - UCLA: 17 (Big Ten)
Golden Gophers (8 - 5) (10 - 2 - 1)
Coach P. J. Fleck (50 - 34)
Avg Score : 26 - 17 (23 - 19 on Road)
Record Prediction: 8 - 5 (#42)
Wins: (Elite: 0) (Good: 1) (Avg: 0) (Bad: 2)
Losses: (Elite: 0) (Good: 2) (Avg: 1) (Bad: 0)
Future: (Elite: 1) (Good: 3) (Avg: 1) (Bad: 1)
Coach P. J. Fleck (50 - 34)
Avg Score : 26 - 17 (23 - 19 on Road)
Record Prediction: 8 - 5 (#42)
Wins: (Elite: 0) (Good: 1) (Avg: 0) (Bad: 2)
Losses: (Elite: 0) (Good: 2) (Avg: 1) (Bad: 0)
Future: (Elite: 1) (Good: 3) (Avg: 1) (Bad: 1)
UCLA is playing their 5th straight game
MINN is playing their 7th straight game
Our Line: Minnesota -8 (SP+ MINN -11.5)
Projected Score: MINN: 25 - UCLA: 17 (41)
MINN Win prob: 62% | Cover: 49%
MINN Travel: 1515 miles, 2 hrs ahead
MINN is playing their 7th straight game
Our Line: Minnesota -8 (SP+ MINN -11.5)
Projected Score: MINN: 25 - UCLA: 17 (41)
MINN Win prob: 62% | Cover: 49%
MINN Travel: 1515 miles, 2 hrs ahead
Bruins (5 - 7) (6 - 6 - 0)
Coach DeShaun Foster (0 - 0)
Avg Score : 18 - 25 (16 - 24 @ Home)
Record Prediction: 5 - 7 (#83)
Wins: (Elite: 0) (Good: 0) (Avg: 1) (Bad: 0)
Losses: (Elite: 2) (Good: 2) (Avg: 0) (Bad: 0)
Future: (Elite: 0) (Good: 6) (Avg: 0) (Bad: 1)
Coach DeShaun Foster (0 - 0)
Avg Score : 18 - 25 (16 - 24 @ Home)
Record Prediction: 5 - 7 (#83)
Wins: (Elite: 0) (Good: 0) (Avg: 1) (Bad: 0)
Losses: (Elite: 2) (Good: 2) (Avg: 0) (Bad: 0)
Future: (Elite: 0) (Good: 6) (Avg: 0) (Bad: 1)
| Minnesota's 2024 Schedule | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover | |
| Thu 8/29 | Minnesota vs North Carolina | +2.0 | 52.5 | L 17 - 19 | U | Y | |
| Sat 9/7 | Minnesota vs Rhode Island | -27.5 | 47.5 | W 48 - 0 | O | Y | |
| Sat 9/14 | Minnesota vs Nevada | -17.5 | 44.5 | W 27 - 0 | U | Y | |
| Sat 9/21 | Minnesota vs Iowa | +3.0 | 34.5 | L 14 - 31 | O | N | |
| Sat 9/28 | Minnesota at Michigan | +10.5 | 34.5 | L 24 - 27 | O | Y | |
| Sat 10/5 | Minnesota vs USC | +8.5 | 45.5 | W 24 - 17 | U | Y | |
| Sat 10/12 | Minnesota at UCLA | -3.5 | 39.0 | W 21 - 17 | U | Y | |
| BYE WEEK | |||||||
| Sat 10/26 | Minnesota vs Maryland | -6.0 | 45.0 | W 48 - 23 | O | Y | |
| Sat 11/2 | Minnesota at Illinois | -2.5 | 47.0 | W 25 - 17 | U | Y | |
| Sat 11/9 | Minnesota at Rutgers | -6.5 | 44.5 | L 19 - 26 | O | N | |
| BYE WEEK | |||||||
| Sat 11/23 | Minnesota vs Penn State | +11.0 | 45.0 | L 25 - 26 | O | Y | |
| Fri 11/29 | Minnesota at Wisconsin | -1.5 | 40.5 | W 24 - 7 | U | Y | |
| Fri 1/3 | Minnesota vs Virginia Tech | -10.0 | 43.5 | W 24 - 10 | U | Y | |
Total: Elite: 1, Good: 6, Avg 2, Bad 1, Poor 2
Played: Elite: 0, Good: 3, Avg 1, Bad 0, Poor 2
Future: Elite: 1, Good: 3, Avg 1, Bad 1, Poor 0
Wins: Elite: 0, Good: 1, Avg: 0, Bad: 0, Poor: 2
Losses: Elite: 0, Good: 2, Avg: 1, Bad: 0, Poor: 0
Predictions for Minnesota's Schedule
Played: Elite: 0, Good: 3, Avg 1, Bad 0, Poor 2
Future: Elite: 1, Good: 3, Avg 1, Bad 1, Poor 0
Wins: Elite: 0, Good: 1, Avg: 0, Bad: 0, Poor: 2
Losses: Elite: 0, Good: 2, Avg: 1, Bad: 0, Poor: 0
| UCLA's 2024 Schedule | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover | |
| Sat 8/31 | UCLA at Hawai'i | -13.5 | 55.5 | W 16 - 13 | U | N | |
| BYE WEEK | |||||||
| Sat 9/14 | UCLA vs Indiana | +3.5 | 46.5 | L 13 - 42 | O | N | |
| Sat 9/21 | UCLA at LSU | +21.5 | 56.5 | L 17 - 34 | U | Y | |
| Sat 9/28 | UCLA vs Oregon | +23.5 | 54.5 | L 13 - 34 | U | Y | |
| Sat 10/5 | UCLA at Penn State | +30.0 | 48.0 | L 11 - 27 | U | Y | |
| Sat 10/12 | UCLA vs Minnesota | +3.5 | 39.0 | L 17 - 21 | U | N | |
| Sat 10/19 | UCLA at Rutgers | +4.0 | 42.5 | W 35 - 32 | O | Y | |
| BYE WEEK | |||||||
| Sat 11/2 | UCLA at Nebraska | +7.5 | 38.5 | W 27 - 20 | O | Y | |
| Fri 11/8 | UCLA vs Iowa | +6.5 | 44.5 | W 20 - 17 | U | Y | |
| Fri 11/15 | UCLA at Washington | +4.5 | 47.0 | L 19 - 31 | O | N | |
| Sat 11/23 | UCLA vs USC | +5.0 | 53.0 | L 13 - 19 | U | N | |
| Sat 11/30 | UCLA vs Fresno State | -7.5 | 46.5 | W 20 - 13 | U | N | |
Total: Elite: 2, Good: 8, Avg 1, Bad 1, Poor 0
Played: Elite: 2, Good: 2, Avg 1, Bad 0, Poor 0
Future: Elite: 0, Good: 6, Avg 0, Bad 1, Poor 0
Wins: Elite: 0, Good: 0, Avg: 1, Bad: 0, Poor: 0
Losses: Elite: 2, Good: 2, Avg: 0, Bad: 0, Poor: 0
Predictions for UCLA's Schedule
Played: Elite: 2, Good: 2, Avg 1, Bad 0, Poor 0
Future: Elite: 0, Good: 6, Avg 0, Bad 1, Poor 0
Wins: Elite: 0, Good: 0, Avg: 1, Bad: 0, Poor: 0
Losses: Elite: 2, Good: 2, Avg: 0, Bad: 0, Poor: 0
Important Stats (2024)
| Teams | Off Explosive. | Off Success | PPG | Rush Success | OL Yds Per Att | Rush YPG | Pass Success | Pass YPG | Off ScoreZone | Def Explosive. | Def Success | Def PPG | RunD Success | Pass D Success | Def ScoreZone | Penalty YPG | TO PG | Def TO PG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MINN | #64 (.2) | 45% (39) | 26.2 | 44% (65) | 2.7 (119) | 103 | 46% (29) | 204 | 4.38 (27) | #16 (.08) | 39% (35) | 16.9 | 36% (8) | 42% (80) | 3.32 (23) | 35.6 | 0.8 | 1.5 |
| UCLA | #99 (.14) | 39% (112) | 18.4 | 34% (131) | 2.47 (132) | 87 | 43% (56) | 242 | 3.15 (123) | #68 (.16) | 46% (110) | 25.3 | 45% (83) | 47% (120) | 4.45 (123) | 68.9 | 1.4 | 1.1 |
| Teams | Off Explosive. | Off Success | PPG | Rush Success | OL Yds Per Att | Rush YPG | Pass Success | Pass YPG | Off ScoreZone | Def Explosive. | Def Success | Def PPG | RunD Success | Pass D Success | Def ScoreZone | Penalty YPG | TO PG | Def TO PG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MINN | #64 (.2) | 45% (39) | 44% (65) | 2.7 (119) | 103 | 46% (29) | 204 | 4.38 (27) | #16 (.08) | 39% (35) | 36% (8) | 42% (80) | 3.32 (23) | 35.6 | 0.8 | 1.5 | ||
| UCLA | #99 (.14) | 39% (112) | 34% (131) | 2.47 (132) | 87 | 43% (56) | 242 | 3.15 (123) | #68 (.16) | 46% (110) | 45% (83) | 47% (120) | 4.45 (123) | 68.9 | 1.4 | 1.1 |
Overall Stats 2024
| Teams | Games | PPG | PPG H/R | Success Rate | Pts PerOpp | TO | 1stD PG | TotalYds PG | RushYds PG | PassYdsPG | RYPA | Run Rate | Pass Rate | Run Success | Pass Success | Havoc Rate | Total PPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MINN Offense | 13 | 26.2 | 22.6 | 44.9% | 4.38 | 0.8 | 19 | 307 | 103 | 204 | 3.7 | 44% | 56% | 44% | 46% | 16% | .2 |
| UCLA Defense | 12 | 25.3 | 24.3 | 45.9% | 4.45 | 1.1 | - | - | - | - | - | 43% | 57% | 45% | 47% | 18% | .16 |
| Teams | Games | PPG | PPG H/R | Success Rate | Pts PerOpp | TO | 1stD PG | TotalYds PG | RushYds PG | PassYdsPG | RYPA | Run Rate | Pass Rate | Run Success | Pass Success | Havoc Rate | Total PPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MINN Defense | 13 | 16.9 | 18.8 | 38.9% | 3.32 | 1.5 | - | - | - | - | - | 50% | 50% | 36% | 42% | 19% | .08 |
| UCLA Offense | 12 | 18.4 | 16 | 39% | 3.15 | 1.4 | 18 | 329 | 87 | 242 | 3.1 | 41% | 59% | 34% | 43% | 17% | .14 |
Additional Stats 2024
| Teams | Games | Possession Time | 1st Downs PG | 3rd Down % | 4th Down % | Penalties PG | Penalty Yds PG | Off TO PG | Def TO PG | TFL PG | Sacks PG | D/ST TDs | Avg Field Pos |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minnesota | 13 | 29:13 | 18.5 | 45% | 90% | 4.5 | 35.6 | 0.8 | 1.5 | 4.4 | 1.8 | 2 | 28.6 |
| UCLA | 12 | 31:07 | 18 | 43% | 50% | 8.2 | 68.9 | 1.4 | 1.1 | 5.3 | 1.8 | 2 | 27.8 |
Run Game Stats (2024)
Pass Game Stats (2024)
| Teams | Games | Run Play Rate | Run Play Success | Rush Att PG | Rush Yds PG | Rush Yds Per Att | Rushing TDs | Run Pred Pts Added | OL Yds Per Att | 3rd/4th & Short | Front 7 Havoc | Run Play Explosivness |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MINN Offense | 13 | 44% (111) | 44% (65) | 28.2 | 102.9 | 3.7 | 17 (84) | .11 (80) | 2.7 (119) | 73% (69) | 10% (80) | 0.88 (113) |
| UCLA Defense | 12 | 43% (2) | 45% (83) | - | - | - | - | .05 (30) | 2.92 (52) | 78% (101) | 10% (68) | 0.72 (2) |
| Teams | Games | Run Play Rate | Run Play Success | Rush Att PG | Rush Yds PG | Rush Yds Per Att | Rushing TDs | Run Pred Pts Added | OL Yds Per Att | 3rd/4th & Short | Front 7 Havoc | Run Play Explosivness |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MINN Defense | 13 | 50% (63) | 36% (8) | - | - | - | - | .02 (19) | 2.71 (22) | 74% (69) | 9% (90) | 0.95 (50) |
| UCLA Offense | 12 | 41% (122) | 34% (131) | 28 | 86.9 | 3.1 | 4 (133) | -.05 (129) | 2.47 (132) | 70% (87) | 10% (85) | 0.94 (84) |
Pass Game Stats (2024)
| Teams | Games | PassPlay Rate | PassPlay Success | Comp PG | Att PG | Yds PG | Yds PA | Yds PC | TDs | Ints | PassPlays PPA | PassPlays Expl | PassDowns Rate | PassDowns Succ Rate | PassDowns PPA | DB Havoc | PassDowns Expl |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MINN Offense | 13 | 56% (25) | 46% (29) | 19.5 | 29.2 | 204.1 | 7 | 10.5 | 18 (68) | 5 (6) | .27 (58) | 1.4 (129) | 30% (46) | 31% (80) | .32 (76) | 6% (70) | 2 (75) |
| UCLA Defense | 12 | 57% (132) | 47% (120) | - | - | - | - | - | - | 10 (66) | .26 (82) | 1.4 (15) | 30% (100) | 33% (106) | .31 (70) | 8% (8) | 2 (53) |
| Teams | Games | PassPlay Rate | PassPlay Success | Comp PG | Att PG | Yds PG | Yds PA | Yds PC | TDs | Ints | PassPlays PPA | PassPlays Expl | PassDowns Rate | PassDowns Succ Rate | PassDowns PPA | DB Havoc | PassDowns Expl |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MINN Defense | 13 | 50% (71) | 42% (80) | - | - | - | - | - | - | 16 (10) | .15 (27) | 1.3 (6) | 33% (43) | 26% (16) | .15 (10) | 10% (1) | 1.8 (20) |
| UCLA Offense | 12 | 59% (12) | 43% (56) | 21.6 | 33.2 | 242.2 | 7.3 | 11.2 | 17 (79) | 11 (72) | .26 (62) | 1.5 (95) | 36% (126) | 36% (21) | .42 (30) | 7% (99) | 1.9 (102) |
Minnesota's Power Ratings
Minnesota's Power Rating: 9.69 #32
Minnesota's Offense Rating: 23.19 #37
Minnesota's Defense Rating: 3.27 #14
2024 Talent Rating: 96.00 #1
Blue Chip Ratio: 7% #48
Minnesota's 2024 Expected Record: 8.0 - 5.0
Minnesota's 2024 Overall SP+ Rating: 10.4 #27
Minnesota's Offense SP+ Rating: 25.6 #79
Minnesota's Defense SP+ Rating: 15.4 #11
Average Talent
Average Big Ten Talent Rating is 96
Average Power Five Talent: 96
Average FBS Talent: 96
Minnesota's Power Rating: 9.69 #32
Minnesota's Offense Rating: 23.19 #37
Minnesota's Defense Rating: 3.27 #14
2024 Talent Rating: 96.00 #1
Blue Chip Ratio: 7% #48
Minnesota's 2024 Expected Record: 8.0 - 5.0
Minnesota's 2024 Overall SP+ Rating: 10.4 #27
Minnesota's Offense SP+ Rating: 25.6 #79
Minnesota's Defense SP+ Rating: 15.4 #11
Average Talent
Average Big Ten Talent Rating is 96
Average Power Five Talent: 96
Average FBS Talent: 96
Power Ratings Matchup
Minnesota: 9.69 UCLA: 2.12
SP+ Ratings Matchup
Minnesota: 10.4 UCLA: -1.3
Minnesota: 9.69 UCLA: 2.12
SP+ Ratings Matchup
Minnesota: 10.4 UCLA: -1.3
UCLA's Power Ratings
UCLA's Power Rating: 2.12 #61
UCLA's Offense Rating: 16.06 #103
UCLA's Defense Rating: 12.38 #94
2024 Talent Rating: 96.00 #1
Blue Chip Ratio: 15 #31
UCLA's 2024 Expected Record: 5.0 - 7.0
UCLA's 2024 Overall SP+ Rating: -1.3 #75
UCLA's Offense SP+ Rating: 21.3 #103
UCLA's Defense SP+ Rating: 23.3 #44
Average Talent
Average Big Ten Talent Rating is 96
Average Power Five Talent: 96
Average FBS Talent: 96
UCLA's Power Rating: 2.12 #61
UCLA's Offense Rating: 16.06 #103
UCLA's Defense Rating: 12.38 #94
2024 Talent Rating: 96.00 #1
Blue Chip Ratio: 15 #31
UCLA's 2024 Expected Record: 5.0 - 7.0
UCLA's 2024 Overall SP+ Rating: -1.3 #75
UCLA's Offense SP+ Rating: 21.3 #103
UCLA's Defense SP+ Rating: 23.3 #44
Average Talent
Average Big Ten Talent Rating is 96
Average Power Five Talent: 96
Average FBS Talent: 96
Minnesota Scoring
Offense: 26.2 PPG
Offense on Road: 22.6
Defense: 16.9 PPG
Defense on Road: 18.8
Minnesota's 2024 Record
Record: 8 - 5
Record vs Spread: 10 - 2 - 1
Record on Road: 4 - 2
Record vs Spread on Road: 4 - 1 - 0
Record as Fav vs Spread: 6 - 1 - 0
Record as Road Fav vs Spread: 3 - 1 - 0
Offense: 26.2 PPG
Offense on Road: 22.6
Defense: 16.9 PPG
Defense on Road: 18.8
Minnesota's 2024 Record
Record: 8 - 5
Record vs Spread: 10 - 2 - 1
Record on Road: 4 - 2
Record vs Spread on Road: 4 - 1 - 0
Record as Fav vs Spread: 6 - 1 - 0
Record as Road Fav vs Spread: 3 - 1 - 0
Projected Score
Minnesota 25
UCLA 17
Total Points: 41
Minnesota 25
UCLA 17
Total Points: 41
UCLA Scoring
Offense: 18.4 PPG
Offense at Home: 16
Defense: 25.3 PPG
Defense at Home: 24.3
UCLA's 2024 Record
Record: 5 - 7
Record vs Spread: 6 - 6 - 0
Record at home: 2 - 4
Record vs Spread at home: 2 - 4 - 0
Record as Dog vs Spread: 6 - 4 - 0
Record as Home Dog vs Spread: 2 - 3 - 0
Offense: 18.4 PPG
Offense at Home: 16
Defense: 25.3 PPG
Defense at Home: 24.3
UCLA's 2024 Record
Record: 5 - 7
Record vs Spread: 6 - 6 - 0
Record at home: 2 - 4
Record vs Spread at home: 2 - 4 - 0
Record as Dog vs Spread: 6 - 4 - 0
Record as Home Dog vs Spread: 2 - 3 - 0
| Year | Date | Home | Score | Away | Score | Winner | Spread | Cover | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 10/12 | UCLA | 17 | Minnesota | 21 | Minnesota | Minnesota -3.5 | Minnesota | 39.0 | Under |
| Team | Wins | Covers | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|
| UCLA | 0 | 0 | 0 Overs |
| Minnesota | 1 | 1 | 1 Unders |
| Wins | Covers | Favs | Dogs | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home Teams | 0 - 1 | 0 - 1 | 0 - 0 | 0 - 1 |
| Road Teams | 1 - 0 | 1 - 0 | 1 - 0 | 0 - 0 |
(#32) Minnesota Info
Power Rating: 9.69 #32
Offense Rating: 23.19 #37
Defense Rating: 3.27 #14
Overall SP+ Rating: 10.4 #27
Offense SP+ Rating: 25.6 #79
Defense SP+ Rating: 15.4 #11
Talent Rating: 96.00 #1
Blue Chip Ratio: 7% #48
Expected Record: 8.0 - 5.0
Team Profile
Pass heavy Offense 56%, Run: 44%
Good Offense Success Rate of 45%
Bad Offensive Explosiveness
Good in Scoring Position 4.38 PPO
Avg Run Success 44%
Good Pass Success 46%
Avg OL Grades, Awful OL Yds Per Rush
Good DL Grades, Poor Sacks/Turnovers
Good Defense Success Rate of 39%
Good in Scoring Position 3.32 PPO
Great Run Def Success 36%
Bad Pass Def Success 42%
Great Pressure/Havoc/Forcing TOs
Bad Field Position
Minnesota has won 1 straight
Minnesota has lost 1 straight on the Road
Record on Road: 4 - 2 (4 - 1 - 0 vs Spread )
Minnesota Notes
(11/23) Fight w/ PSU. Off awful, 2 TO's, coaching cost
(11/13) WTF gag vs Gers, Rgame 19 att/35 yds! Def bad
(11/2) Even w/ Ill, forced 2 TOs. Brosmer/Rgame enough
(10/16) Into wk 8, have 17 Def TO's, 2nd in CFB
(10/13) Rgame awful, Run Def great, clutch W @ UCLA
(10/4) Pass 60% = avg success. Rgame 3.4 ypc, 100 ypg
(9/28) Rgame is shockingly awful. Brosmer OK vs Mich
(9/1) Run game awful vs NC, Brosmer bad, have no WR
(8/28) Is RB Taylor healthy? Check warmups vs NC
(8/1) QB Brosmer (N Hampshire) looks fun, WR decent
Minnesota Highlights
Minnesota offense is good in red zone (#93)
Minnesota offense is good on 3rd downs
Minnesota defense does not give up big plays (#83)
Minnesota defense is really good in red zone (#77)
Minnesota has a good run defense (#6)
Minnesota Defensive Line is very good (#9)
Minnesota Secondary is very good (#76)
Minnesota has a great TO Margin (#82)
Minnesota commits very few Penalties (#38)
Minnesota defense Intercepts a lot of Passes (#56)
Minnesota Deficiencies
Minnesota Can Not Run the Ball (#49)
Minnesota offense is not Explosive (#72)
Power Rating: 9.69 #32
Offense Rating: 23.19 #37
Defense Rating: 3.27 #14
Overall SP+ Rating: 10.4 #27
Offense SP+ Rating: 25.6 #79
Defense SP+ Rating: 15.4 #11
Talent Rating: 96.00 #1
Blue Chip Ratio: 7% #48
Expected Record: 8.0 - 5.0
Team Profile
Pass heavy Offense 56%, Run: 44%
Good Offense Success Rate of 45%
Bad Offensive Explosiveness
Good in Scoring Position 4.38 PPO
Avg Run Success 44%
Good Pass Success 46%
Avg OL Grades, Awful OL Yds Per Rush
Good DL Grades, Poor Sacks/Turnovers
Good Defense Success Rate of 39%
Good in Scoring Position 3.32 PPO
Great Run Def Success 36%
Bad Pass Def Success 42%
Great Pressure/Havoc/Forcing TOs
Bad Field Position
Minnesota has won 1 straight
Minnesota has lost 1 straight on the Road
Record on Road: 4 - 2 (4 - 1 - 0 vs Spread )
Minnesota Notes
(11/23) Fight w/ PSU. Off awful, 2 TO's, coaching cost
(11/13) WTF gag vs Gers, Rgame 19 att/35 yds! Def bad
(11/2) Even w/ Ill, forced 2 TOs. Brosmer/Rgame enough
(10/16) Into wk 8, have 17 Def TO's, 2nd in CFB
(10/13) Rgame awful, Run Def great, clutch W @ UCLA
(10/4) Pass 60% = avg success. Rgame 3.4 ypc, 100 ypg
(9/28) Rgame is shockingly awful. Brosmer OK vs Mich
(9/1) Run game awful vs NC, Brosmer bad, have no WR
(8/28) Is RB Taylor healthy? Check warmups vs NC
(8/1) QB Brosmer (N Hampshire) looks fun, WR decent
Minnesota Highlights
Minnesota offense is good in red zone (#93)
Minnesota offense is good on 3rd downs
Minnesota defense does not give up big plays (#83)
Minnesota defense is really good in red zone (#77)
Minnesota has a good run defense (#6)
Minnesota Defensive Line is very good (#9)
Minnesota Secondary is very good (#76)
Minnesota has a great TO Margin (#82)
Minnesota commits very few Penalties (#38)
Minnesota defense Intercepts a lot of Passes (#56)
Minnesota Deficiencies
Minnesota Can Not Run the Ball (#49)
Minnesota offense is not Explosive (#72)
| Performance GradesPerf Grades | ||
|---|---|---|
| CategoryCat | UCLA | MINN |
| OverallOver | #78 | #18 |
| OffenseOff | #92 | #37 |
| DefenseDef | #71 | #19 |
| Special TeamsST | #74 | #1 |
| PassingPass | #64 | #11 |
| RushingRush | #99 | #53 |
| Run BlockRBLK | #85 | #29 |
| Pass BlockPBLK | #106 | #68 |
| Route RunningWR Rt | #58 | #53 |
| TacklingTkl | #48 | #77 |
| Run DefenseR Def | #77 | #18 |
| Pass Rush DefPRush | #99 | #60 |
| Coverage DefCov | #41 | #33 |
(#61) UCLA Info
Power Rating: 2.12 #61
Offense Rating: 16.06 #103
Defense Rating: 12.38 #94
Overall SP+ Rating: -1.3 #75
Offense SP+ Rating: 21.3 #103
Defense SP+ Rating: 23.3 #44
Talent Rating: 96.00 #1
Blue Chip Ratio: 15 #31
Expected Record: 5.0 - 7.0
Team Profile
Very Pass heavy Offense 59%, Run: 41%
Awful Offense Success Rate of 39%
Poor Offensive Explosiveness
Awful in Scoring Position 3.15 PPO
Awful Run Success 34%
Avg Pass Success 43%
Bad OL Grades, Awful OL Yds Per Rush
Avg DL Grades, Bad Sacks/Turnovers
Poor Defense Success Rate of 46%
Awful in Scoring Position 4.45 PPO
Bad Run Def Success 45%
Awful Pass Def Success 47%
Good Pressure/Havoc/Forcing TOs
Avg Field Position
UCLA has lost 4 straight
UCLA has lost 2 straight at Home
Record at home: 2 - 4 (2 - 4 - 0 vs Spread)
UCLA Notes
(12/5) Fired OC Bieniemy after one season
(12/5) Hired IU Co-OC Tino Sunseri
(11/24) Off 3-11 on 3rd, 0-3 4th, 13 pts in L (USC)
(11/18) Garbers bad, Rgame abysmal in Wash L, Def good
(11/13) 3 W's w/ Iowa, Garbers good, Rgame good in W
(11/2) 2 straight Road W's, fighting hard. Garbers good
(10/28) -5.7 ppg via TOs, near last in CFB thru 7 games
(10/22) Def stop rate 47% (#124) into week 9
(10/19) Hung 35, torched Gers, Garbers great, Rgame bad
(10/18) Has not scored < 17 pts in any game to date
UCLA Highlights
UCLA defense does not give up big plays (#15)
UCLA Secondary is very good (#136)
UCLA Deficiencies
UCLA has a really bad Offense
UCLA has a really bad Offense at Home
UCLA Can Not Run the Ball (#102)
UCLA Commits a Lot of Penalties (#133)
UCLA offense is really bad (#70)
UCLA Runs Get Stuffed a Lot (#46)
UCLA offense is bad in Scoring Opportunities (#86)
UCLA run game is really bad (#81)
UCLA has a bad defense (#134)
UCLA has a bad red zone defense (#133)
Power Rating: 2.12 #61
Offense Rating: 16.06 #103
Defense Rating: 12.38 #94
Overall SP+ Rating: -1.3 #75
Offense SP+ Rating: 21.3 #103
Defense SP+ Rating: 23.3 #44
Talent Rating: 96.00 #1
Blue Chip Ratio: 15 #31
Expected Record: 5.0 - 7.0
Team Profile
Very Pass heavy Offense 59%, Run: 41%
Awful Offense Success Rate of 39%
Poor Offensive Explosiveness
Awful in Scoring Position 3.15 PPO
Awful Run Success 34%
Avg Pass Success 43%
Bad OL Grades, Awful OL Yds Per Rush
Avg DL Grades, Bad Sacks/Turnovers
Poor Defense Success Rate of 46%
Awful in Scoring Position 4.45 PPO
Bad Run Def Success 45%
Awful Pass Def Success 47%
Good Pressure/Havoc/Forcing TOs
Avg Field Position
UCLA has lost 4 straight
UCLA has lost 2 straight at Home
Record at home: 2 - 4 (2 - 4 - 0 vs Spread)
UCLA Notes
(12/5) Fired OC Bieniemy after one season
(12/5) Hired IU Co-OC Tino Sunseri
(11/24) Off 3-11 on 3rd, 0-3 4th, 13 pts in L (USC)
(11/18) Garbers bad, Rgame abysmal in Wash L, Def good
(11/13) 3 W's w/ Iowa, Garbers good, Rgame good in W
(11/2) 2 straight Road W's, fighting hard. Garbers good
(10/28) -5.7 ppg via TOs, near last in CFB thru 7 games
(10/22) Def stop rate 47% (#124) into week 9
(10/19) Hung 35, torched Gers, Garbers great, Rgame bad
(10/18) Has not scored < 17 pts in any game to date
UCLA Highlights
UCLA defense does not give up big plays (#15)
UCLA Secondary is very good (#136)
UCLA Deficiencies
UCLA has a really bad Offense
UCLA has a really bad Offense at Home
UCLA Can Not Run the Ball (#102)
UCLA Commits a Lot of Penalties (#133)
UCLA offense is really bad (#70)
UCLA Runs Get Stuffed a Lot (#46)
UCLA offense is bad in Scoring Opportunities (#86)
UCLA run game is really bad (#81)
UCLA has a bad defense (#134)
UCLA has a bad red zone defense (#133)
| Player Name | COMP | ATT | PCT | YDS | TD | INT | YPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Max Brosmer (Tr) | 268 | 403 | 67% | 2829 | 18 | 6 | 7.0 |
| Drake Lindsey | 4 | 5 | 80% | 50 | 1 | 0 | 10.0 |
| Player Name | CAR | YDS | TD | YPC | LONG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Darius Taylor | 205 | 986 | 10 | 4.8 | 80 |
| Marcus Major (Tr) | 78 | 352 | 3 | 4.5 | 40 |
| Jaren Mangham (Tr) | 19 | 123 | 0 | 6.5 | 18 |
| Jordan Nubin | 11 | 19 | 0 | 1.7 | 7 |
| Player Name | REC | YDS | TD | YPC | LONG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel Jackson | 75 | 863 | 4 | 11.5 | 39 |
| Elijah Spencer | 52 | 685 | 6 | 13.2 | 29 |
| Darius Taylor | 54 | 350 | 2 | 6.5 | 22 |
| Jameson Geers | 27 | 286 | 4 | 10.6 | 23 |
| Top Def | Tack | TFL | SACKS | PRESS | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cody Lindenberg | 94 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 6 |
| Maverick Baranowski | 65 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Kerry Brown | 63 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Danny Striggow | 52 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 1 |
| Sacks | Tack | TFL | SACKS | PRESS | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anthony Smith | 27 | 12 | 6 | 10 | 1 |
| Jack Henderson | 44 | 9 | 6 | 1 | 1 |
| Danny Striggow | 52 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 1 |
| Jah Joyner | 32 | 6 | 5 | 9 | 7 |
| Pass D | Tack | TFL | SACKS | PRESS | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Justin Walley | 42 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 10 |
| Ethan Robinson (Tr) | 42 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 9 |
| Jah Joyner | 32 | 6 | 5 | 9 | 7 |
| Player Name | COMP | ATT | PCT | YDS | TD | INT | YPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ethan Garbers | 235 | 363 | 65% | 2727 | 16 | 11 | 7.5 |
| Justyn Martin | 24 | 35 | 69% | 179 | 1 | 0 | 5.1 |
| Player Name | CAR | YDS | TD | YPC | LONG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TJ Harden | 124 | 505 | 2 | 4.1 | 40 |
| Keegan Jones | 47 | 179 | 1 | 3.8 | 22 |
| Jalen Berger | 48 | 178 | 0 | 3.7 | 18 |
| Ethan Garbers | 83 | 137 | 1 | 1.7 | 57 |
| Player Name | REC | YDS | TD | YPC | LONG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moliki Matavao | 41 | 506 | 2 | 12.3 | 35 |
| TJ Harden | 40 | 368 | 1 | 9.2 | 53 |
| Logan Loya | 29 | 348 | 4 | 12.0 | 29 |
| Kwazi Gilmer | 31 | 345 | 2 | 11.1 | 48 |
| Top Def | Tack | TFL | SACKS | PRESS | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carson Schwesinger | 136 | 9 | 4 | 3 | 3 |
| Kain Medrano | 72 | 11 | 2 | 4 | 4 |
| Oluwafemi Oladejo | 57 | 14 | 5 | 6 | 2 |
| KJ Wallace | 49 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 10 |
| Sacks | Tack | TFL | SACKS | PRESS | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oluwafemi Oladejo | 57 | 14 | 5 | 6 | 2 |
| Carson Schwesinger | 136 | 9 | 4 | 3 | 3 |
| Devin Aupiu | 15 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| Kain Medrano | 72 | 11 | 2 | 4 | 4 |
| Pass D | Tack | TFL | SACKS | PRESS | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KJ Wallace | 49 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 10 |
| Kaylin Moore (Tr) | 37 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 9 |
| Bryan Addison (Tr) | 43 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 |