


Saturday, November 29th 2025 (12:00 AM EST)
Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum - Los Angeles, CA (Big Ten)
Bruins (0 - 3) (0 - 3 - 0)
Coach Tim Skipper (Int) (0 - 0)
Avg Score : 14 - 36 (23 - 30 on Road)
Record Prediction: 0.8 - 11.2 (#136)
Wins: (Elite: 0) (Good: 0) (Avg: 0) (Bad: 0)
Losses: (Elite: 1) (Good: 0) (Avg: 0) (Bad: 2)
Future: (Elite: 4) (Good: 4) (Avg: 0) (Bad: 1)
Coach Tim Skipper (Int) (0 - 0)
Avg Score : 14 - 36 (23 - 30 on Road)
Record Prediction: 0.8 - 11.2 (#136)
Wins: (Elite: 0) (Good: 0) (Avg: 0) (Bad: 0)
Losses: (Elite: 1) (Good: 0) (Avg: 0) (Bad: 2)
Future: (Elite: 4) (Good: 4) (Avg: 0) (Bad: 1)
USC is playing their 5th straight game
UCLA is playing their 4th straight game
Our Line: USC -35 (SP+ USC -24)
Projected Score: UCLA: 15 - USC: 50 (65)
USC Win prob: 99% | Cover: 47%
UCLA Travel: 12 miles
UCLA is playing their 4th straight game
Our Line: USC -35 (SP+ USC -24)
Projected Score: UCLA: 15 - USC: 50 (65)
USC Win prob: 99% | Cover: 47%
UCLA Travel: 12 miles
Trojans (3 - 0) (2 - 1 - 0)
Coach Lincoln Riley (25 - 14)
Avg Score : 55 - 17 (66 - 17 @ Home)
Record Prediction: 9.8 - 2.2 (#9)
Wins: (Elite: 0) (Good: 0) (Avg: 0) (Bad: 3)
Losses: (Elite: 0) (Good: 0) (Avg: 0) (Bad: 0)
Future: (Elite: 5) (Good: 2) (Avg: 0) (Bad: 2)
Coach Lincoln Riley (25 - 14)
Avg Score : 55 - 17 (66 - 17 @ Home)
Record Prediction: 9.8 - 2.2 (#9)
Wins: (Elite: 0) (Good: 0) (Avg: 0) (Bad: 3)
Losses: (Elite: 0) (Good: 0) (Avg: 0) (Bad: 0)
Future: (Elite: 5) (Good: 2) (Avg: 0) (Bad: 2)
 
UCLA's 2025 Schedule | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover | |
Sat 8/30 | UCLA vs Utah | +6.5 | 50.5 | L 10 - 43 | O | N | |
Sat 9/6 | UCLA at UNLV | -2.5 | 54.5 | L 23 - 30 | U | N | |
Fri 9/12 | UCLA vs New Mexico | -15.5 | 52.5 | L 10 - 35 | U | N | |
BYE WEEK | |||||||
Sat 9/27 | UCLA vs Northwestern | +8.5 | |||||
Sat 10/4 | UCLA vs Penn State | +34.5 | |||||
Sat 10/11 | UCLA at Michigan State | +17.5 | |||||
Sat 10/18 | UCLA vs Maryland | +14.5 | |||||
Sat 10/25 | UCLA at Indiana | +29.5 | |||||
BYE WEEK | |||||||
Sat 11/8 | UCLA vs Nebraska | +21.5 | |||||
Sat 11/15 | UCLA at Ohio State | +39 | |||||
Sat 11/22 | UCLA vs Washington | +20.5 | |||||
Sat 11/29 | UCLA at USC | +35 |
Total: Elite: 5, Good: 4, Avg 0, Bad 2, Poor 1
Played: Elite: 1, Good: 0, Avg 0, Bad 1, Poor 1
Future: Elite: 4, Good: 4, Avg 0, Bad 1, Poor 0
Wins: Elite: 0, Good: 0, Avg: 0, Bad: 0, Poor: 0
Losses: Elite: 1, Good: 0, Avg: 0, Bad: 1, Poor: 1
Predictions for UCLA's Schedule
Played: Elite: 1, Good: 0, Avg 0, Bad 1, Poor 1
Future: Elite: 4, Good: 4, Avg 0, Bad 1, Poor 0
Wins: Elite: 0, Good: 0, Avg: 0, Bad: 0, Poor: 0
Losses: Elite: 1, Good: 0, Avg: 0, Bad: 1, Poor: 1
USC's 2025 Schedule | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover | |
Sat 8/30 | USC vs Missouri State | -34.5 | 59.5 | W 73 - 13 | O | Y | |
Sat 9/6 | USC vs Georgia Southern | -29.0 | 61.5 | W 59 - 20 | O | Y | |
Sat 9/13 | USC at Purdue | -20.5 | 59.5 | W 33 - 17 | U | N | |
Sat 9/20 | USC vs Michigan State | -17.5 | 55.5 | ||||
Sat 9/27 | USC at Illinois | -2.5 | |||||
BYE WEEK | |||||||
Sat 10/11 | USC vs Michigan | -5.5 | |||||
Sat 10/18 | USC at Notre Dame | -5 | |||||
BYE WEEK | |||||||
Sat 11/1 | USC at Nebraska | -5.5 | |||||
Sat 11/8 | USC vs Northwestern | -28.5 | |||||
Sat 11/15 | USC vs Iowa | -14.5 | |||||
Sat 11/22 | USC at Oregon | +7 | |||||
Sat 11/29 | USC vs UCLA | -35 |
Total: Elite: 5, Good: 2, Avg 0, Bad 3, Poor 2
Played: Elite: 0, Good: 0, Avg 0, Bad 1, Poor 2
Future: Elite: 5, Good: 2, Avg 0, Bad 2, Poor 0
Wins: Elite: 0, Good: 0, Avg: 0, Bad: 1, Poor: 2
Losses: Elite: 0, Good: 0, Avg: 0, Bad: 0, Poor: 0
Predictions for USC's Schedule
Played: Elite: 0, Good: 0, Avg 0, Bad 1, Poor 2
Future: Elite: 5, Good: 2, Avg 0, Bad 2, Poor 0
Wins: Elite: 0, Good: 0, Avg: 0, Bad: 1, Poor: 2
Losses: Elite: 0, Good: 0, Avg: 0, Bad: 0, Poor: 0
Important Stats (2025)
Teams | Off Explosive. | Off Success | PPG | Rush Success | OL Yds Per Att | Rush YPG | Pass Success | Pass YPG | Off ScoreZone | Def Explosive. | Def Success | Def PPG | RunD Success | Pass D Success | Def ScoreZone | Penalty YPG | TO PG | Def TO PG |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UCLA | #69 (.2) | 43% (70) | 14.3 | 43% (81) | 3.27 (38) | 122 | 44% (62) | 203 | 3.67 (86) | #129 (.4) | 57% (134) | 36 | 55% (131) | 61% (136) | 5.62 (133) | 91.7 | 1.3 | 0.7 |
USC | #3 (.6) | 62% (2) | 55 | 65% (3) | 4 (2) | 240 | 59% (7) | 364 | 5.59 (9) | #8 (-.1) | 36% (43) | 16.7 | 39% (69) | 35% (42) | 1.95 (14) | 80.3 | 0.7 | 2.3 |
Teams | Off Explosive. | Off Success | PPG | Rush Success | OL Yds Per Att | Rush YPG | Pass Success | Pass YPG | Off ScoreZone | Def Explosive. | Def Success | Def PPG | RunD Success | Pass D Success | Def ScoreZone | Penalty YPG | TO PG | Def TO PG |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UCLA | #99 (.14) | 39% (112) | 34% (131) | 2.47 (132) | 87 | 43% (56) | 242 | 3.15 (123) | #68 (.16) | 46% (110) | 45% (83) | 47% (120) | 4.45 (123) | 68.9 | 1.4 | 1.1 | ||
USC | #41 (.24) | 48% (11) | 52% (10) | 3.49 (9) | 138 | 46% (26) | 269 | 3.76 (85) | #78 (.18) | 44% (94) | 44% (78) | 44% (103) | 3.64 (49) | 46 | 1.4 | 1.2 |
Overall Stats 2025
Teams | Games | PPG | PPG H/R | Success Rate | Pts PerOpp | TO | 1stD PG | TotalYds PG | RushYds PG | PassYdsPG | RYPA | Run Rate | Pass Rate | Run Success | Pass Success | Havoc Rate | Total PPA |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UCLA Offense | 3 | 14.3 | 23 | 43.4% | 3.67 | 1.3 | 19 | 325 | 122 | 203 | 4.6 | 43% | 56% | 43% | 44% | 15% | .2 |
USC Defense | 3 | 16.7 | 16.5 | 35.9% | 1.95 | 2.3 | - | - | - | - | - | 34% | 66% | 39% | 35% | 22% | -.1 |
Teams | Games | PPG | PPG H/R | Success Rate | Pts PerOpp | TO | 1stD PG | TotalYds PG | RushYds PG | PassYdsPG | RYPA | Run Rate | Pass Rate | Run Success | Pass Success | Havoc Rate | Total PPA |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UCLA Defense | 3 | 36 | 30 | 57.4% | 5.62 | 0.7 | - | - | - | - | - | 60% | 40% | 55% | 61% | 7% | .4 |
USC Offense | 3 | 55 | 66 | 61.7% | 5.59 | 0.7 | 26 | 604 | 240 | 364 | 7 | 51% | 48% | 65% | 59% | 10% | .6 |
Additional Stats 2025
Teams | Games | Possession Time | 1st Downs PG | 3rd Down % | 4th Down % | Penalties PG | Penalty Yds PG | Off TO PG | Def TO PG | TFL PG | Sacks PG | D/ST TDs | Avg Field Pos |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UCLA | 3 | 25:46 | 18.7 | 23% | 70% | 10 | 91.7 | 1.3 | 0.7 | 1.7 | 0.7 | 0 | 24.9 |
USC | 3 | 30:36 | 25.7 | 52% | 100% | 7.3 | 80.3 | 0.7 | 2.3 | 10.3 | 4.7 | 2 | 26.2 |
Run Game Stats (2025)
Pass Game Stats (2025)
Teams | Games | Run Play Rate | Run Play Success | Rush Att PG | Rush Yds PG | Rush Yds Per Att | Rushing TDs | Run Pred Pts Added | OL Yds Per Att | 3rd/4th & Short | Front 7 Havoc | Run Play Explosivness |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UCLA Offense | 3 | 43% (106) | 43% (81) | 26.7 | 122 | 4.6 | 1 (127) | .3 (30) | 3.27 (38) | 53% (123) | 9% (76) | 1.38 (12) |
USC Defense | 3 | 34% (2) | 39% (69) | - | - | - | - | .03 (58) | 2.82 (75) | 67% (53) | 17% (6) | 0.9 (59) |
Teams | Games | Run Play Rate | Run Play Success | Rush Att PG | Rush Yds PG | Rush Yds Per Att | Rushing TDs | Run Pred Pts Added | OL Yds Per Att | 3rd/4th & Short | Front 7 Havoc | Run Play Explosivness |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UCLA Defense | 3 | 60% (123) | 55% (131) | - | - | - | - | .24 (116) | 3.51 (129) | 92% (124) | 5% (130) | 0.77 (28) |
USC Offense | 3 | 51% (63) | 65% (3) | 34.3 | 240 | 7 | 12 (3) | .37 (16) | 4 (2) | 89% (16) | 8% (47) | 0.79 (111) |
Pass Game Stats (2025)
Teams | Games | PassPlay Rate | PassPlay Success | Comp PG | Att PG | Yds PG | Yds PA | Yds PC | TDs | Ints | PassPlays PPA | PassPlays Expl | PassDowns Rate | PassDowns Succ Rate | PassDowns PPA | DB Havoc | PassDowns Expl |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UCLA Offense | 3 | 56% (30) | 44% (62) | 20.7 | 32.3 | 202.7 | 6.3 | 9.8 | 3 (90) | 3 (92) | .19 (94) | 1.2 (127) | 25% (22) | 32% (64) | .08 (119) | 6% (86) | 1.5 (124) |
USC Defense | 3 | 66% (135) | 35% (42) | - | - | - | - | - | - | 6 (2) | -.18 (8) | 1.7 (112) | 38% (18) | 28% (65) | .03 (23) | 5% (80) | 2.4 (119) |
Teams | Games | PassPlay Rate | PassPlay Success | Comp PG | Att PG | Yds PG | Yds PA | Yds PC | TDs | Ints | PassPlays PPA | PassPlays Expl | PassDowns Rate | PassDowns Succ Rate | PassDowns PPA | DB Havoc | PassDowns Expl |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UCLA Defense | 3 | 40% (14) | 61% (136) | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0 | .62 (131) | 1.4 (35) | 20% (135) | 44% (130) | .5 (114) | 2% (136) | 1.3 (5) |
USC Offense | 3 | 48% (74) | 59% (7) | 20.3 | 28.3 | 364 | 12.9 | 17.9 | 7 (23) | 0 (1) | .91 (2) | 2 (10) | 20% (7) | 38% (32) | .69 (18) | 3% (26) | 2.4 (19) |
UCLA's Power Ratings
UCLA's Power Rating: -8.32 #102
UCLA's Offense Rating: 13.35 #65
UCLA's Defense Rating: 21.67 #125
2025 Talent Rating: 796.00 #54
Blue Chip Ratio: 12% #37
UCLA's 2025 Expected Record: 0.8 - 11.2
UCLA's 2025 Overall SP+ Rating: -4.6 #85
UCLA's Offense SP+ Rating: 24.2 #89
UCLA's Defense SP+ Rating: 29.0 #84
Average Talent
Average Big Ten Talent Rating is 906.67
Average Power Five Talent: 877.82
Average FBS Talent: 715.85
UCLA's Power Rating: -8.32 #102
UCLA's Offense Rating: 13.35 #65
UCLA's Defense Rating: 21.67 #125
2025 Talent Rating: 796.00 #54
Blue Chip Ratio: 12% #37
UCLA's 2025 Expected Record: 0.8 - 11.2
UCLA's 2025 Overall SP+ Rating: -4.6 #85
UCLA's Offense SP+ Rating: 24.2 #89
UCLA's Defense SP+ Rating: 29.0 #84
Average Talent
Average Big Ten Talent Rating is 906.67
Average Power Five Talent: 877.82
Average FBS Talent: 715.85
Power Ratings Matchup
UCLA: -8.32 USC: 28.345
SP+ Ratings Matchup
UCLA: -4.6 USC: 19.8
UCLA: -8.32 USC: 28.345
SP+ Ratings Matchup
UCLA: -4.6 USC: 19.8
USC's Power Ratings
USC's Power Rating: 28.345 #9
USC's Offense Rating: 29.19 #6
USC's Defense Rating: -4.40 #10
2025 Talent Rating: 906.00 #21
Blue Chip Ratio: 40 #18
USC's 2025 Expected Record: 9.8 - 2.2
USC's 2025 Overall SP+ Rating: 19.8 #9
USC's Offense SP+ Rating: 41.1 #3
USC's Defense SP+ Rating: 21.5 #35
Average Talent
Average Big Ten Talent Rating is 906.67
Average Power Five Talent: 877.82
Average FBS Talent: 715.85
USC's Power Rating: 28.345 #9
USC's Offense Rating: 29.19 #6
USC's Defense Rating: -4.40 #10
2025 Talent Rating: 906.00 #21
Blue Chip Ratio: 40 #18
USC's 2025 Expected Record: 9.8 - 2.2
USC's 2025 Overall SP+ Rating: 19.8 #9
USC's Offense SP+ Rating: 41.1 #3
USC's Defense SP+ Rating: 21.5 #35
Average Talent
Average Big Ten Talent Rating is 906.67
Average Power Five Talent: 877.82
Average FBS Talent: 715.85
UCLA Scoring
Offense: 14.3 PPG
Offense on Road: 23
Defense: 36 PPG
Defense on Road: 30
UCLA's 2025 Record
Record: 0 - 3
Record vs Spread: 0 - 3 - 0
Record on Road: 0 - 1
Record vs Spread on Road: 0 - 1 - 0
Offense: 14.3 PPG
Offense on Road: 23
Defense: 36 PPG
Defense on Road: 30
UCLA's 2025 Record
Record: 0 - 3
Record vs Spread: 0 - 3 - 0
Record on Road: 0 - 1
Record vs Spread on Road: 0 - 1 - 0
Projected Score
USC 50
UCLA 15
Total Points: 65
USC 50
UCLA 15
Total Points: 65
USC Scoring
Offense: 55 PPG
Offense at Home: 66
Defense: 16.7 PPG
Defense at Home: 16.5
USC's 2025 Record
Record: 3 - 0
Record vs Spread: 2 - 1 - 0
Record at home: 2 - 0
Record vs Spread at home: 2 - 0 - 0
Offense: 55 PPG
Offense at Home: 66
Defense: 16.7 PPG
Defense at Home: 16.5
USC's 2025 Record
Record: 3 - 0
Record vs Spread: 2 - 1 - 0
Record at home: 2 - 0
Record vs Spread at home: 2 - 0 - 0
Year | Date | Home | Score | Away | Score | Winner | Spread | Cover | Total | O/U |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 11/23 | UCLA | 13 | USC | 19 | USC | USC -5 | USC | 53.0 | Under |
2023 | 11/18 | USC | 20 | UCLA | 38 | UCLA | USC -6 | UCLA | 65.5 | Under |
2022 | 11/19 | UCLA | 45 | USC | 48 | USC | USC -2.5 | USC | 76.5 | Over |
2021 | 11/20 | USC | 33 | UCLA | 62 | UCLA | UCLA -4.5 | UCLA | 66.5 | Over |
2020 | 12/12 | UCLA | 38 | USC | 43 | USC | USC -3.5 | USC | 64.0 | Over |
2019 | 11/23 | USC | 52 | UCLA | 35 | USC | USC -12.5 | USC | 66.0 | Over |
2018 | 11/17 | UCLA | 34 | USC | 27 | UCLA | USC -2.5 | UCLA | 55.0 | Over |
2017 | 11/18 | USC | 28 | UCLA | 23 | USC | USC -14.5 | UCLA | 70.5 | Under |
2016 | 11/19 | UCLA | 14 | USC | 36 | USC | USC -10.5 | USC | 53.0 | Under |
2015 | 11/28 | USC | 40 | UCLA | 21 | USC | USC -3.5 | USC | 61.0 | Push |
2014 | 11/22 | UCLA | 38 | USC | 20 | UCLA | UCLA -3 | UCLA | 0 | |
2013 | 11/30 | USC | 14 | UCLA | 35 | UCLA | USC -3.5 | UCLA | 0 | |
2012 | 11/17 | UCLA | 38 | USC | 28 | UCLA | ||||
2011 | 11/26 | USC | 50 | UCLA | 0 | USC | ||||
2010 | 12/04 | UCLA | 14 | USC | 28 | USC | ||||
2009 | 11/28 | USC | 28 | UCLA | 7 | USC | ||||
2008 | 12/06 | UCLA | 7 | USC | 28 | USC | ||||
2007 | 12/01 | USC | 24 | UCLA | 7 | USC | ||||
2006 | 12/02 | UCLA | 13 | USC | 9 | UCLA | ||||
2005 | 12/03 | USC | 66 | UCLA | 19 | USC | ||||
2004 | 12/04 | UCLA | 24 | USC | 29 | USC | ||||
2003 | 11/22 | USC | 47 | UCLA | 22 | USC | ||||
2001 | 11/17 | USC | 27 | UCLA | 0 | USC | ||||
2000 | 11/17 | UCLA | 35 | USC | 38 | USC |
Team | Wins | Covers | O/U |
---|---|---|---|
USC | 17 | 6 | 5 Overs |
UCLA | 7 | 6 | 4 Unders |
Wins | Covers | Favs | Dogs | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Home Teams | 13 - 11 | 4 - 8 | 3 - 3 | 1 - 5 |
Road Teams | 11 - 13 | 8 - 4 | 5 - 1 | 3 - 3 |
(#102) UCLA Info
Power Rating: -8.32 #102
Offense Rating: 13.35 #65
Defense Rating: 21.67 #125
Overall SP+ Rating: -4.6 #85
Offense SP+ Rating: 24.2 #89
Defense SP+ Rating: 29.0 #84
Talent Rating: 796.00 #54
Blue Chip Ratio: 12% #37
Expected Record: 0.8 - 11.2
Team Profile
Pass heavy Offense 56%, Run: 43%
Bad Offense Success Rate of 43%
Bad Offensive Explosiveness
Bad in Scoring Position 3.67 PPO
Bad Run Success 43%
Avg Pass Success 44%
Poor OL Grades, Good OL Yds Per Rush
Avg DL Grades, Awful Sacks/Turnovers
Awful Defense Success Rate of 57%
Awful in Scoring Position 5.62 PPO
Awful Run Def Success 55%
Awful Pass Def Success 61%
Awful Pressure/Havoc/Forcing TOs
Bad Field Position
UCLA has lost 11 straight
UCLA has lost 5 straight on the Road
Record on Road: 0 - 1 (0 - 1 - 0 vs Spread )
UCLA Notes
(9/13) Outscored 30-0 in 1st quarter in 1st 3 games
(9/13) NM mauled Bruins Def up front. Run Off sucks
(9/13) 1st team on quit watch. 0-12 very much in play
(9/8) QB2 Clarkson arrested (9/8) serious charges
(8/27) Def lost top 11 tacklers and every DB starter
(8/22) Off will score points, but Def looks really meh
(8/22) New OC Sunseri (IU) a massive upgrade
(8/21) WR Kaedin Robinson ruled ineligible, big blow?
(6/6) WR 3 portals + Gilmer & Atimalala. Stock up
(6/6) DB added 9 portals. Will find CBs with sheer #'s
UCLA Highlights
UCLA defense does not give up big plays (#15)
UCLA defense Intercepts a lot of Passes (#)
UCLA Deficiencies
UCLA has a really bad Offense
UCLA Can Not Run the Ball (#102)
UCLA Commits a Lot of Penalties (#133)
UCLA offense is bad on 3rd Downs
UCLA Defense Gives up a Lot of Points
UCLA does not Sack the QB (#122)
UCLA has a bad defense (#134)
UCLA Does Not Stuff Runs (#134)
UCLA has a bad defensive line (#129)
UCLA has a bad red zone defense (#133)
Power Rating: -8.32 #102
Offense Rating: 13.35 #65
Defense Rating: 21.67 #125
Overall SP+ Rating: -4.6 #85
Offense SP+ Rating: 24.2 #89
Defense SP+ Rating: 29.0 #84
Talent Rating: 796.00 #54
Blue Chip Ratio: 12% #37
Expected Record: 0.8 - 11.2
Team Profile
Pass heavy Offense 56%, Run: 43%
Bad Offense Success Rate of 43%
Bad Offensive Explosiveness
Bad in Scoring Position 3.67 PPO
Bad Run Success 43%
Avg Pass Success 44%
Poor OL Grades, Good OL Yds Per Rush
Avg DL Grades, Awful Sacks/Turnovers
Awful Defense Success Rate of 57%
Awful in Scoring Position 5.62 PPO
Awful Run Def Success 55%
Awful Pass Def Success 61%
Awful Pressure/Havoc/Forcing TOs
Bad Field Position
UCLA has lost 11 straight
UCLA has lost 5 straight on the Road
Record on Road: 0 - 1 (0 - 1 - 0 vs Spread )
UCLA Notes
(9/13) Outscored 30-0 in 1st quarter in 1st 3 games
(9/13) NM mauled Bruins Def up front. Run Off sucks
(9/13) 1st team on quit watch. 0-12 very much in play
(9/8) QB2 Clarkson arrested (9/8) serious charges
(8/27) Def lost top 11 tacklers and every DB starter
(8/22) Off will score points, but Def looks really meh
(8/22) New OC Sunseri (IU) a massive upgrade
(8/21) WR Kaedin Robinson ruled ineligible, big blow?
(6/6) WR 3 portals + Gilmer & Atimalala. Stock up
(6/6) DB added 9 portals. Will find CBs with sheer #'s
UCLA Highlights
UCLA defense does not give up big plays (#15)
UCLA defense Intercepts a lot of Passes (#)
UCLA Deficiencies
UCLA has a really bad Offense
UCLA Can Not Run the Ball (#102)
UCLA Commits a Lot of Penalties (#133)
UCLA offense is bad on 3rd Downs
UCLA Defense Gives up a Lot of Points
UCLA does not Sack the QB (#122)
UCLA has a bad defense (#134)
UCLA Does Not Stuff Runs (#134)
UCLA has a bad defensive line (#129)
UCLA has a bad red zone defense (#133)
Performance GradesPerf Grades | ||
---|---|---|
CategoryCat | USC | UCLA |
OverallOver | #7 | #94 |
OffenseOff | #11 | #93 |
DefenseDef | #11 | #96 |
Special TeamsST | #30 | #75 |
PassingPass | #30 | #46 |
RushingRush | #23 | #73 |
Run BlockRBLK | #45 | #92 |
Pass BlockPBLK | #18 | #114 |
Route RunningWR Rt | #4 | #73 |
TacklingTkl | #11 | #92 |
Run DefenseR Def | #35 | #83 |
Pass Rush DefPRush | #41 | #86 |
Coverage DefCov | #1 | #108 |
(#9) USC Info
Power Rating: 28.345 #9
Offense Rating: 29.19 #6
Defense Rating: -4.40 #10
Overall SP+ Rating: 19.8 #9
Offense SP+ Rating: 41.1 #3
Defense SP+ Rating: 21.5 #35
Talent Rating: 906.00 #21
Blue Chip Ratio: 40 #18
Expected Record: 9.8 - 2.2
Team Profile
Balanced offense, Pass: 48%, Run: 51%
Great Offense Success Rate of 62%
Great Offensive Explosiveness
Great in Scoring Position 5.59 PPO
Great Run Success 65%
Great Pass Success 59%
Avg OL Grades, Great OL Yds Per Rush
Good DL Grades, Great Sacks/Turnovers
Good Defense Success Rate of 36%
Great in Scoring Position 1.95 PPO
Bad Run Def Success 39%
Good Pass Def Success 35%
Great Pressure/Havoc/Forcing TOs
Poor Field Position
USC has lost 8 straight
USC has lost 4 straight at Home
Record at home: 2 - 0 (2 - 0 - 0 vs Spread)
USC Notes
(8/22) QB Maiava good at times, but is he a baller?
(8/21) OG DJ Winfield ruled ineligible, blow to OL
(6/5) WR Lemon/Lane a top duo in CFB, 2 portal adds
(6/5) Def lost a lot. 7 Portal adds, 5 DB, 2 DL.
(6/5) New OC Huard (USC QBs), Riley still calling plays
(6/5) F7 very talented but not very productive so far
(6/5) DBs should be much better with 5 portal adds
(5/23) Safeties Ramsey & Fitzgerald a strong duo
(5/13) Caden Chittenden (UNLV) top kicker portal add
(4/4) JUCO RB Waymond Jordan looks great early
USC Highlights
USC in Undefeated
USC is Undefeated at Home
USC is Undefeated vs Spread at Home
USC has Really Good Running Game (#13)
USC offense is efficent (#2)
USC has a top Offensive Line (#2)
USC offense is good in red zone (#9)
USC offense is good on 3rd downs
USC does Not Get Runs Stuffed (#6)
USC Defense Sacks the QB a lot
USC defense is really good in red zone (#14)
USC Stuffs a lot of Run Plays (#22)
USC Front 7 is disruptive (#6)
USC has a great TO Margin (#28)
USC defense Intercepts a lot of Passes (#2)
USC Deficiencies
USC Commits a Lot of Penalties (#103)
USC gives up a Lot of Explosive Plays (#114)
Power Rating: 28.345 #9
Offense Rating: 29.19 #6
Defense Rating: -4.40 #10
Overall SP+ Rating: 19.8 #9
Offense SP+ Rating: 41.1 #3
Defense SP+ Rating: 21.5 #35
Talent Rating: 906.00 #21
Blue Chip Ratio: 40 #18
Expected Record: 9.8 - 2.2
Team Profile
Balanced offense, Pass: 48%, Run: 51%
Great Offense Success Rate of 62%
Great Offensive Explosiveness
Great in Scoring Position 5.59 PPO
Great Run Success 65%
Great Pass Success 59%
Avg OL Grades, Great OL Yds Per Rush
Good DL Grades, Great Sacks/Turnovers
Good Defense Success Rate of 36%
Great in Scoring Position 1.95 PPO
Bad Run Def Success 39%
Good Pass Def Success 35%
Great Pressure/Havoc/Forcing TOs
Poor Field Position
USC has lost 8 straight
USC has lost 4 straight at Home
Record at home: 2 - 0 (2 - 0 - 0 vs Spread)
USC Notes
(8/22) QB Maiava good at times, but is he a baller?
(8/21) OG DJ Winfield ruled ineligible, blow to OL
(6/5) WR Lemon/Lane a top duo in CFB, 2 portal adds
(6/5) Def lost a lot. 7 Portal adds, 5 DB, 2 DL.
(6/5) New OC Huard (USC QBs), Riley still calling plays
(6/5) F7 very talented but not very productive so far
(6/5) DBs should be much better with 5 portal adds
(5/23) Safeties Ramsey & Fitzgerald a strong duo
(5/13) Caden Chittenden (UNLV) top kicker portal add
(4/4) JUCO RB Waymond Jordan looks great early
USC Highlights
USC in Undefeated
USC is Undefeated at Home
USC is Undefeated vs Spread at Home
USC has Really Good Running Game (#13)
USC offense is efficent (#2)
USC has a top Offensive Line (#2)
USC offense is good in red zone (#9)
USC offense is good on 3rd downs
USC does Not Get Runs Stuffed (#6)
USC Defense Sacks the QB a lot
USC defense is really good in red zone (#14)
USC Stuffs a lot of Run Plays (#22)
USC Front 7 is disruptive (#6)
USC has a great TO Margin (#28)
USC defense Intercepts a lot of Passes (#2)
USC Deficiencies
USC Commits a Lot of Penalties (#103)
USC gives up a Lot of Explosive Plays (#114)
Player Name | COMP | ATT | PCT | YDS | TD | INT | YPA |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nico Iamaleava (Tr) | 62 | 97 | 64% | 608 | 3 | 3 | 6.3 |
Player Name | CAR | YDS | TD | YPC | LONG |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nico Iamaleava (Tr) | 30 | 139 | 1 | 4.6 | 30 |
Anthony Woods (Tr) | 21 | 117 | 0 | 5.6 | 33 |
Jaivian Thomas (Tr) | 16 | 74 | 0 | 4.6 | 32 |
Jalen Berger | 13 | 36 | 0 | 2.8 | 20 |
Player Name | REC | YDS | TD | YPC | LONG |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Kwazi Gilmer | 16 | 174 | 0 | 10.9 | 21 |
Mikey Matthews (Tr) | 10 | 123 | 0 | 12.3 | 32 |
Anthony Woods (Tr) | 10 | 91 | 1 | 9.1 | 19 |
Titus Mokiao-Atimalala | 5 | 57 | 1 | 11.4 | 15 |
Top Def | Tack | TFL | SACKS | PRESS | PD |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Isaiah Chisom (Tr) | 37 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
JonJon Vaughns | 35 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Key Lawrence (Tr) | 19 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
Cole Martin (Tr) | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Sacks | Tack | TFL | SACKS | PRESS | PD |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Kechaun Bennett (Tr) | 9 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
Anthony Jones (Tr) | 8 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Isaiah Chisom (Tr) | 37 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
A.J. Fuimaono | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Pass D | Tack | TFL | SACKS | PRESS | PD |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cole Martin (Tr) | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Kanye Clark | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Rodrick Pleasant (Tr) | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Player Name | COMP | ATT | PCT | YDS | TD | INT | YPA |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jayden Maiava | 48 | 70 | 69% | 989 | 6 | 0 | 14.1 |
Husan Longstreet | 13 | 15 | 87% | 103 | 1 | 0 | 6.9 |
Player Name | CAR | YDS | TD | YPC | LONG |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Waymond Jordan | 39 | 286 | 3 | 7.3 | 36 |
Eli Sanders (Tr) | 23 | 160 | 2 | 7.0 | 20 |
King Miller | 11 | 152 | 2 | 13.8 | 75 |
Husan Longstreet | 9 | 60 | 2 | 6.7 | 17 |
Player Name | REC | YDS | TD | YPC | LONG |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Makai Lemon | 16 | 311 | 2 | 19.4 | 74 |
Ja'Kobi Lane | 9 | 239 | 1 | 26.6 | 59 |
Lake McRee | 7 | 173 | 1 | 24.7 | 64 |
Eli Sanders (Tr) | 4 | 88 | 1 | 22.0 | 73 |
Top Def | Tack | TFL | SACKS | PRESS | PD |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Eric Gentry | 21 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
Bishop Fitzgerald (Tr) | 15 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Christian Pierce | 11 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Desman Stephens II | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Sacks | Tack | TFL | SACKS | PRESS | PD |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Eric Gentry | 21 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
Kameryn Fountain | 6 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
Braylan Shelby | 9 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
Anthony Lucas | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
Pass D | Tack | TFL | SACKS | PRESS | PD |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Kevin Longstreet (Tr) | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Devan Thompkins | 5 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Bishop Fitzgerald (Tr) | 15 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |