Washington Huskies at Rutgers Scarlet Knights
Friday, September 27th 2024 (8:00 PM EDT)
Rutgers -1.5 (44.5) (-120) Open: -2.5 | 45.5
Rutgers 21 - Washington: 18 (Big Ten)
Huskies (6 - 7) (5 - 8 - 0)
Coach Jedd Fisch (0 - 0)
Avg Score : 23 - 24 (16 - 35 on Road)
Record Prediction: 6 - 7 (#72)
Wins: (Elite: ) (Good: ) (Avg: ) (Bad: 0)
Losses: (Elite: ) (Good: ) (Avg: ) (Bad: 0)
Future: (Elite: ) (Good: ) (Avg: ) (Bad: 0)
Coach Jedd Fisch (0 - 0)
Avg Score : 23 - 24 (16 - 35 on Road)
Record Prediction: 6 - 7 (#72)
Wins: (Elite: ) (Good: ) (Avg: ) (Bad: 0)
Losses: (Elite: ) (Good: ) (Avg: ) (Bad: 0)
Future: (Elite: ) (Good: ) (Avg: ) (Bad: 0)
WASH is playing their 5th straight game
Our Line: Rutgers -6 (SP+ RUTG -3)
Projected Score: WASH: 21 - RUTG: 27 (48)
RUTG Win prob: 50% | Cover: 47%
WASH Travel: 2384 miles, 3 hrs behind
Our Line: Rutgers -6 (SP+ RUTG -3)
Projected Score: WASH: 21 - RUTG: 27 (48)
RUTG Win prob: 50% | Cover: 47%
WASH Travel: 2384 miles, 3 hrs behind
Scarlet Knights (7 - 6) (7 - 5 - 1)
Coach Greg Schiano (19 - 28)
Avg Score : 29 - 25 (30 - 25 @ Home)
Record Prediction: 7 - 6 (#59)
Wins: (Elite: ) (Good: ) (Avg: ) (Bad: 0)
Losses: (Elite: ) (Good: ) (Avg: ) (Bad: 0)
Future: (Elite: ) (Good: ) (Avg: ) (Bad: 0)
Coach Greg Schiano (19 - 28)
Avg Score : 29 - 25 (30 - 25 @ Home)
Record Prediction: 7 - 6 (#59)
Wins: (Elite: ) (Good: ) (Avg: ) (Bad: 0)
Losses: (Elite: ) (Good: ) (Avg: ) (Bad: 0)
Future: (Elite: ) (Good: ) (Avg: ) (Bad: 0)
| Washington's 2024 Schedule | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover | |
| Sat 8/31 | Washington vs Weber State | -29.0 | 51.5 | W 35 - 3 | U | Y | |
| Sat 9/7 | Washington vs Eastern Michigan | -25.0 | 48.5 | W 30 - 9 | U | N | |
| Sat 9/14 | Washington vs Washington State | -4.0 | 56.0 | L 19 - 24 | U | N | |
| Sat 9/21 | Washington vs Northwestern | -11.5 | 42.5 | W 24 - 5 | U | Y | |
| Fri 9/27 | Washington at Rutgers | +1.5 | 44.5 | L 18 - 21 | U | N | |
| Sat 10/5 | Washington vs Michigan | -1.5 | 39.5 | W 27 - 17 | O | Y | |
| Sat 10/12 | Washington at Iowa | +2.5 | 41.5 | L 16 - 40 | O | N | |
| BYE WEEK | |||||||
| Sat 10/26 | Washington at Indiana | +5.5 | 54.0 | L 17 - 31 | U | N | |
| Sat 11/2 | Washington vs USC | +2.0 | 55.0 | W 26 - 21 | U | Y | |
| Sat 11/9 | Washington at Penn State | +13.5 | 48.0 | L 6 - 35 | U | N | |
| Fri 11/15 | Washington vs UCLA | -4.5 | 47.0 | W 31 - 19 | O | Y | |
| BYE WEEK | |||||||
| Sat 11/30 | Washington at Oregon | +17.5 | 50.5 | L 21 - 49 | O | N | |
| Tue 12/31 | Washington vs Louisville | -1.0 | 50.5 | L 34 - 35 | O | N | |
Total: Elite: , Good: , Avg , Bad , Poor
Played: Elite: , Good: , Avg , Bad , Poor
Future: Elite: , Good: , Avg , Bad , Poor
Wins: Elite: , Good: , Avg: , Bad: , Poor:
Losses: Elite: , Good: , Avg: , Bad: , Poor:
Predictions for Washington's Schedule
Played: Elite: , Good: , Avg , Bad , Poor
Future: Elite: , Good: , Avg , Bad , Poor
Wins: Elite: , Good: , Avg: , Bad: , Poor:
Losses: Elite: , Good: , Avg: , Bad: , Poor:
| Rutgers's 2024 Schedule | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover | |
| Thu 8/29 | Rutgers vs Howard | -38.5 | 51.5 | W 44 - 7 | U | N | |
| Sat 9/7 | Rutgers vs Akron | -24.5 | 41.5 | W 49 - 17 | O | Y | |
| BYE WEEK | |||||||
| Sat 9/21 | Rutgers at Virginia Tech | +3.0 | 45.0 | W 26 - 23 | O | Y | |
| Fri 9/27 | Rutgers vs Washington | -1.5 | 44.5 | W 21 - 18 | U | Y | |
| Sat 10/5 | Rutgers at Nebraska | +7.0 | 39.5 | L 7 - 14 | U | Y | |
| Sat 10/12 | Rutgers vs Wisconsin | -1.0 | 43.5 | L 7 - 42 | O | N | |
| Sat 10/19 | Rutgers vs UCLA | -4.0 | 42.5 | L 32 - 35 | O | N | |
| Fri 10/25 | Rutgers at USC | +14.0 | 57.0 | L 20 - 42 | O | N | |
| BYE WEEK | |||||||
| Sat 11/9 | Rutgers vs Minnesota | +6.5 | 44.5 | W 26 - 19 | O | Y | |
| Sat 11/16 | Rutgers at Maryland | +4.5 | 54.5 | W 31 - 17 | U | Y | |
| Sat 11/23 | Rutgers vs Illinois | -2.0 | 48.0 | L 31 - 38 | O | N | |
| Sat 11/30 | Rutgers at Michigan State | +1.5 | 46.5 | W 41 - 14 | O | Y | |
| Thu 12/26 | Rutgers vs Kansas State | +7.5 | 51.5 | L 41 - 44 | O | Y | |
Total: Elite: , Good: , Avg , Bad , Poor
Played: Elite: , Good: , Avg , Bad , Poor
Future: Elite: , Good: , Avg , Bad , Poor
Wins: Elite: , Good: , Avg: , Bad: , Poor:
Losses: Elite: , Good: , Avg: , Bad: , Poor:
Predictions for Rutgers's Schedule
Played: Elite: , Good: , Avg , Bad , Poor
Future: Elite: , Good: , Avg , Bad , Poor
Wins: Elite: , Good: , Avg: , Bad: , Poor:
Losses: Elite: , Good: , Avg: , Bad: , Poor:
Important Stats (2024)
| Teams | Off Explosive. | Off Success | PPG | Rush Success | OL Yds Per Att | Rush YPG | Pass Success | Pass YPG | Off ScoreZone | Def Explosive. | Def Success | Def PPG | RunD Success | Pass D Success | Def ScoreZone | Penalty YPG | TO PG | Def TO PG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WASH | #32 (.25) | 47% (21) | 23.4 | 46% (36) | 3.29 (28) | 122 | 48% (13) | 233 | 3.52 (102) | #54 (.14) | 43% (83) | 23.8 | 48% (116) | 38% (31) | 4.04 (95) | 48.7 | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| RUTG | #84 (.16) | 43% (67) | 28.9 | 44% (69) | 2.92 (88) | 164 | 42% (63) | 189 | 4.19 (44) | #106 (.23) | 43% (85) | 25.4 | 48% (113) | 40% (59) | 4.03 (92) | 33.8 | 0.6 | 0.9 |
| Teams | Off Explosive. | Off Success | PPG | Rush Success | OL Yds Per Att | Rush YPG | Pass Success | Pass YPG | Off ScoreZone | Def Explosive. | Def Success | Def PPG | RunD Success | Pass D Success | Def ScoreZone | Penalty YPG | TO PG | Def TO PG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WASH | #32 (.25) | 47% (21) | 46% (36) | 3.29 (28) | 122 | 48% (13) | 233 | 3.52 (102) | #54 (.14) | 43% (83) | 48% (116) | 38% (31) | 4.04 (95) | 48.7 | 0.8 | 1.2 | ||
| RUTG | #84 (.16) | 43% (67) | 44% (69) | 2.92 (88) | 164 | 42% (63) | 189 | 4.19 (44) | #106 (.23) | 43% (85) | 48% (113) | 40% (59) | 4.03 (92) | 33.8 | 0.6 | 0.9 |
Overall Stats 2024
| Teams | Games | PPG | PPG H/R | Success Rate | Pts PerOpp | TO | 1stD PG | TotalYds PG | RushYds PG | PassYdsPG | RYPA | Run Rate | Pass Rate | Run Success | Pass Success | Havoc Rate | Total PPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WASH Offense | 13 | 23.4 | 15.6 | 47% | 3.52 | 0.8 | 19 | 355 | 122 | 233 | 4.1 | 46% | 54% | 46% | 48% | 16% | .25 |
| RUTG Defense | 13 | 25.4 | 25.1 | 43.3% | 4.03 | 0.9 | - | - | - | - | - | 46% | 54% | 48% | 40% | 15% | .23 |
| Teams | Games | PPG | PPG H/R | Success Rate | Pts PerOpp | TO | 1stD PG | TotalYds PG | RushYds PG | PassYdsPG | RYPA | Run Rate | Pass Rate | Run Success | Pass Success | Havoc Rate | Total PPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WASH Defense | 13 | 23.8 | 35.2 | 43.1% | 4.04 | 1.2 | - | - | - | - | - | 52% | 48% | 48% | 38% | 14% | .14 |
| RUTG Offense | 13 | 28.9 | 30 | 42.9% | 4.19 | 0.6 | 21 | 353 | 164 | 189 | 4.5 | 53% | 47% | 44% | 42% | 14% | .16 |
Additional Stats 2024
| Teams | Games | Possession Time | 1st Downs PG | 3rd Down % | 4th Down % | Penalties PG | Penalty Yds PG | Off TO PG | Def TO PG | TFL PG | Sacks PG | D/ST TDs | Avg Field Pos |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Washington | 13 | 27:50 | 19.1 | 36% | 46% | 5.5 | 48.7 | 0.8 | 1.2 | 3.3 | 1.5 | 0 | 27.9 |
| Rutgers | 13 | 29:30 | 21 | 43% | 48% | 3.9 | 33.8 | 0.6 | 0.9 | 3.7 | 1.5 | 1 | 29.4 |
Run Game Stats (2024)
Pass Game Stats (2024)
| Teams | Games | Run Play Rate | Run Play Success | Rush Att PG | Rush Yds PG | Rush Yds Per Att | Rushing TDs | Run Pred Pts Added | OL Yds Per Att | 3rd/4th & Short | Front 7 Havoc | Run Play Explosivness |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WASH Offense | 13 | 46% (100) | 46% (36) | 29.5 | 121.6 | 4.1 | 13 (105) | .12 (78) | 3.29 (28) | 77% (43) | 11% (101) | 0.83 (123) |
| RUTG Defense | 13 | 46% (18) | 48% (113) | - | - | - | - | .26 (126) | 3.2 (99) | 82% (123) | 8% (115) | 1.07 (104) |
| Teams | Games | Run Play Rate | Run Play Success | Rush Att PG | Rush Yds PG | Rush Yds Per Att | Rushing TDs | Run Pred Pts Added | OL Yds Per Att | 3rd/4th & Short | Front 7 Havoc | Run Play Explosivness |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WASH Defense | 13 | 52% (79) | 48% (116) | - | - | - | - | .19 (106) | 3.3 (114) | 68% (36) | 7% (131) | 0.89 (31) |
| RUTG Offense | 13 | 53% (51) | 44% (69) | 36.8 | 163.8 | 4.5 | 24 (45) | .1 (87) | 2.92 (88) | 76% (52) | 7% (11) | 0.91 (97) |
Pass Game Stats (2024)
| Teams | Games | PassPlay Rate | PassPlay Success | Comp PG | Att PG | Yds PG | Yds PA | Yds PC | TDs | Ints | PassPlays PPA | PassPlays Expl | PassDowns Rate | PassDowns Succ Rate | PassDowns PPA | DB Havoc | PassDowns Expl |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WASH Offense | 13 | 54% (38) | 48% (13) | 21.2 | 29.6 | 232.9 | 7.9 | 11 | 18 (68) | 7 (26) | .37 (22) | 1.5 (117) | 27% (6) | 34% (44) | .35 (62) | 5% (35) | 1.8 (121) |
| RUTG Defense | 13 | 54% (117) | 40% (59) | - | - | - | - | - | - | 7 (104) | .23 (69) | 1.6 (82) | 33% (50) | 31% (75) | .32 (76) | 7% (49) | 2.2 (101) |
| Teams | Games | PassPlay Rate | PassPlay Success | Comp PG | Att PG | Yds PG | Yds PA | Yds PC | TDs | Ints | PassPlays PPA | PassPlays Expl | PassDowns Rate | PassDowns Succ Rate | PassDowns PPA | DB Havoc | PassDowns Expl |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WASH Defense | 13 | 48% (58) | 38% (31) | - | - | - | - | - | - | 8 (93) | .09 (13) | 1.5 (40) | 30% (95) | 33% (98) | .35 (90) | 7% (32) | 2 (57) |
| RUTG Offense | 13 | 47% (88) | 42% (63) | 15.3 | 27.9 | 189.2 | 6.8 | 12.4 | 17 (79) | 6 (10) | .25 (75) | 1.6 (63) | 30% (42) | 34% (37) | .42 (32) | 7% (108) | 2 (69) |
Washington's Power Ratings
Washington's Power Rating: -0.06 #64
Washington's Offense Rating: 19.16 #73
Washington's Defense Rating: 11.11 #81
2024 Talent Rating: 96.00 #1
Blue Chip Ratio: 25% #23
Washington's 2024 Expected Record: 6.0 - 7.0
Washington's 2024 Overall SP+ Rating: 3.1 #58
Washington's Offense SP+ Rating: 27.3 #66
Washington's Defense SP+ Rating: 22.4 #36
Average Talent
Average Big Ten Talent Rating is 96
Average Power Five Talent: 96
Average FBS Talent: 96
Washington's Power Rating: -0.06 #64
Washington's Offense Rating: 19.16 #73
Washington's Defense Rating: 11.11 #81
2024 Talent Rating: 96.00 #1
Blue Chip Ratio: 25% #23
Washington's 2024 Expected Record: 6.0 - 7.0
Washington's 2024 Overall SP+ Rating: 3.1 #58
Washington's Offense SP+ Rating: 27.3 #66
Washington's Defense SP+ Rating: 22.4 #36
Average Talent
Average Big Ten Talent Rating is 96
Average Power Five Talent: 96
Average FBS Talent: 96
Power Ratings Matchup
Washington: -0.06 Rutgers: 7.585
SP+ Ratings Matchup
Washington: 3.1 Rutgers: 6.4
Washington: -0.06 Rutgers: 7.585
SP+ Ratings Matchup
Washington: 3.1 Rutgers: 6.4
Rutgers's Power Ratings
Rutgers's Power Rating: 7.585 #47
Rutgers's Offense Rating: 20.78 #57
Rutgers's Defense Rating: 9.63 #70
2024 Talent Rating: 96.00 #1
Blue Chip Ratio: 2 #82
Rutgers's 2024 Expected Record: 7.0 - 6.0
Rutgers's 2024 Overall SP+ Rating: 6.4 #42
Rutgers's Offense SP+ Rating: 28.5 #58
Rutgers's Defense SP+ Rating: 22.8 #38
Average Talent
Average Big Ten Talent Rating is 96
Average Power Five Talent: 96
Average FBS Talent: 96
Rutgers's Power Rating: 7.585 #47
Rutgers's Offense Rating: 20.78 #57
Rutgers's Defense Rating: 9.63 #70
2024 Talent Rating: 96.00 #1
Blue Chip Ratio: 2 #82
Rutgers's 2024 Expected Record: 7.0 - 6.0
Rutgers's 2024 Overall SP+ Rating: 6.4 #42
Rutgers's Offense SP+ Rating: 28.5 #58
Rutgers's Defense SP+ Rating: 22.8 #38
Average Talent
Average Big Ten Talent Rating is 96
Average Power Five Talent: 96
Average FBS Talent: 96
Washington Scoring
Offense: 23.4 PPG
Offense on Road: 15.6
Defense: 23.8 PPG
Defense on Road: 35.2
Washington's 2024 Record
Record: 6 - 7
Record vs Spread: 5 - 8 - 0
Record on Road: 0 - 5
Record vs Spread on Road: 0 - 5 - 0
Record as Dog vs Spread: 1 - 5 - 0
Record as Road Dog vs Spread: 0 - 5 - 0
Offense: 23.4 PPG
Offense on Road: 15.6
Defense: 23.8 PPG
Defense on Road: 35.2
Washington's 2024 Record
Record: 6 - 7
Record vs Spread: 5 - 8 - 0
Record on Road: 0 - 5
Record vs Spread on Road: 0 - 5 - 0
Record as Dog vs Spread: 1 - 5 - 0
Record as Road Dog vs Spread: 0 - 5 - 0
Projected Score
Rutgers 27
Washington 21
Total Points: 48
Rutgers 27
Washington 21
Total Points: 48
Rutgers Scoring
Offense: 28.9 PPG
Offense at Home: 30
Defense: 25.4 PPG
Defense at Home: 25.1
Rutgers's 2024 Record
Record: 7 - 6
Record vs Spread: 7 - 5 - 1
Record at home: 4 - 3
Record vs Spread at home: 3 - 4 - 0
Record as Fav vs Spread: 2 - 4 - 0
Record as Home Fav vs Spread: 2 - 4 - 0
Offense: 28.9 PPG
Offense at Home: 30
Defense: 25.4 PPG
Defense at Home: 25.1
Rutgers's 2024 Record
Record: 7 - 6
Record vs Spread: 7 - 5 - 1
Record at home: 4 - 3
Record vs Spread at home: 3 - 4 - 0
Record as Fav vs Spread: 2 - 4 - 0
Record as Home Fav vs Spread: 2 - 4 - 0
| Year | Date | Home | Score | Away | Score | Winner | Spread | Cover | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 09/27 | Rutgers | 21 | Washington | 18 | Rutgers | Rutgers -1.5 | Rutgers | 44.5 | Under |
| 2017 | 09/01 | Rutgers | 14 | Washington | 30 | Washington | Washington -28 | Rutgers | 54.5 | Under |
| 2016 | 09/03 | Washington | 48 | Rutgers | 13 | Washington | Washington -22.5 | Washington | 56.5 | Over |
| Team | Wins | Covers | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rutgers | 1 | 2 | 1 Overs |
| Washington | 2 | 1 | 2 Unders |
| Wins | Covers | Favs | Dogs | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home Teams | 2 - 1 | 3 - 0 | 2 - 0 | 1 - 0 |
| Road Teams | 1 - 2 | 0 - 3 | 0 - 1 | 0 - 2 |
(#64) Washington Info
Power Rating: -0.06 #64
Offense Rating: 19.16 #73
Defense Rating: 11.11 #81
Overall SP+ Rating: 3.1 #58
Offense SP+ Rating: 27.3 #66
Defense SP+ Rating: 22.4 #36
Talent Rating: 96.00 #1
Blue Chip Ratio: 25% #23
Expected Record: 6.0 - 7.0
Team Profile
Pass heavy Offense 54%, Run: 46%
Great Offense Success Rate of 47%
Good Offensive Explosiveness
Poor in Scoring Position 3.52 PPO
Good Run Success 46%
Great Pass Success 48%
Poor OL Grades, Good OL Yds Per Rush
Avg DL Grades, Awful Sacks/Turnovers
Bad Defense Success Rate of 43%
Poor in Scoring Position 4.04 PPO
Awful Run Def Success 48%
Good Pass Def Success 38%
Poor Pressure/Havoc/Forcing TOs
Avg Field Position
Washington has won 1 straight
Record on Road: 0 - 5 (0 - 5 - 0 vs Spread )
Washington Notes
(12/27) Hired DC Walters (Pur HC)
(11/18) QB Williams replaced Rogers (UCLA W) better QB
(11/18) Good W vs UCLA, Run Def great, Off enough
(11/13) Off abysmal vs PSU, Rgame yuck, Def torched
(11/2) Big W over USC, Outgained but forced 3 TO's
(10/6) OG'd Michigan by 150+. QB Rogers really good
(10/4) Off #'s both Run/Pass great, flags killing them
(9/27) Outgained Gers by 200+ yds. 2-12 3rd down killer
(9/11) Off: Rogers good, WRs Hunter/Boston good.
(8/4) OL & DL do not have the talent TY
Washington Highlights
Washington offense is efficent (#10)
Washington has a top Offensive Line (#20)
Washington does Not Get Runs Stuffed (#73)
Washington defense does not give up big plays (#129)
Washington has a great TO Margin (#11)
Washington Deficiencies
Washington offense is not Explosive (#50)
Washington offense is bad in Scoring Opportunities (#25)
Washington Does Not Stuff Runs (#101)
Washington has a bad defensive line (#76)
Power Rating: -0.06 #64
Offense Rating: 19.16 #73
Defense Rating: 11.11 #81
Overall SP+ Rating: 3.1 #58
Offense SP+ Rating: 27.3 #66
Defense SP+ Rating: 22.4 #36
Talent Rating: 96.00 #1
Blue Chip Ratio: 25% #23
Expected Record: 6.0 - 7.0
Team Profile
Pass heavy Offense 54%, Run: 46%
Great Offense Success Rate of 47%
Good Offensive Explosiveness
Poor in Scoring Position 3.52 PPO
Good Run Success 46%
Great Pass Success 48%
Poor OL Grades, Good OL Yds Per Rush
Avg DL Grades, Awful Sacks/Turnovers
Bad Defense Success Rate of 43%
Poor in Scoring Position 4.04 PPO
Awful Run Def Success 48%
Good Pass Def Success 38%
Poor Pressure/Havoc/Forcing TOs
Avg Field Position
Washington has won 1 straight
Record on Road: 0 - 5 (0 - 5 - 0 vs Spread )
Washington Notes
(12/27) Hired DC Walters (Pur HC)
(11/18) QB Williams replaced Rogers (UCLA W) better QB
(11/18) Good W vs UCLA, Run Def great, Off enough
(11/13) Off abysmal vs PSU, Rgame yuck, Def torched
(11/2) Big W over USC, Outgained but forced 3 TO's
(10/6) OG'd Michigan by 150+. QB Rogers really good
(10/4) Off #'s both Run/Pass great, flags killing them
(9/27) Outgained Gers by 200+ yds. 2-12 3rd down killer
(9/11) Off: Rogers good, WRs Hunter/Boston good.
(8/4) OL & DL do not have the talent TY
Washington Highlights
Washington offense is efficent (#10)
Washington has a top Offensive Line (#20)
Washington does Not Get Runs Stuffed (#73)
Washington defense does not give up big plays (#129)
Washington has a great TO Margin (#11)
Washington Deficiencies
Washington offense is not Explosive (#50)
Washington offense is bad in Scoring Opportunities (#25)
Washington Does Not Stuff Runs (#101)
Washington has a bad defensive line (#76)
| Performance GradesPerf Grades | ||
|---|---|---|
| CategoryCat | RUTG | WASH |
| OverallOver | #30 | #47 |
| OffenseOff | #20 | #58 |
| DefenseDef | #41 | #46 |
| Special TeamsST | #104 | #98 |
| PassingPass | #32 | #67 |
| RushingRush | #42 | #25 |
| Run BlockRBLK | #7 | #81 |
| Pass BlockPBLK | #72 | #114 |
| Route RunningWR Rt | #43 | #7 |
| TacklingTkl | #51 | #2 |
| Run DefenseR Def | #71 | #72 |
| Pass Rush DefPRush | #25 | #69 |
| Coverage DefCov | #58 | #10 |
(#47) Rutgers Info
Power Rating: 7.585 #47
Offense Rating: 20.78 #57
Defense Rating: 9.63 #70
Overall SP+ Rating: 6.4 #42
Offense SP+ Rating: 28.5 #58
Defense SP+ Rating: 22.8 #38
Talent Rating: 96.00 #1
Blue Chip Ratio: 2 #82
Expected Record: 7.0 - 6.0
Team Profile
Balanced offense, Pass: 47%, Run: 53%
Bad Offense Success Rate of 43%
Bad Offensive Explosiveness
Good in Scoring Position 4.19 PPO
Bad Run Success 44%
Avg Pass Success 42%
Avg OL Grades, Bad OL Yds Per Rush
Good DL Grades, Awful Sacks/Turnovers
Bad Defense Success Rate of 43%
Poor in Scoring Position 4.03 PPO
Awful Run Def Success 48%
Avg Pass Def Success 40%
Bad Pressure/Havoc/Forcing TOs
Bad Field Position
Rutgers has won 3 straight
Rutgers has won 2 straight at Home
Record at home: 4 - 3 (3 - 4 - 0 vs Spread)
Rutgers Notes
(11/18) 2 str W's after bye, outplayed by MD but W
(11/13) Great W (Minn), Def great, QB 240/3 TD's
(11/13) Great W over Minn after bye, had 4 cons L's
(10/19) Def awful, esp vs pass. UCLA 225 yds 1st half
(10/19) Torched by UCLA QB, Off got in gear later
(10/12) Torched by Wisc, Def all 300+ rush yds, QB awful
(10/4) Run Def bottom 20 success rate. Off 60% Runs
(9/27) Beat UW but OG'd by 200+ yds, Rush/3rd Def +
(9/21) Huge W @ VT. Rgame shut down but great Pass D
(9/20) Off is solid, has identity, good QB play, tough
Rutgers Highlights
Rutgers has a great TO Margin (#1)
Rutgers commits very few Penalties (#25)
Rutgers Deficiencies
Rutgers offense is not Explosive (#94)
Rutgers gives up a Lot of Explosive Plays (#117)
Power Rating: 7.585 #47
Offense Rating: 20.78 #57
Defense Rating: 9.63 #70
Overall SP+ Rating: 6.4 #42
Offense SP+ Rating: 28.5 #58
Defense SP+ Rating: 22.8 #38
Talent Rating: 96.00 #1
Blue Chip Ratio: 2 #82
Expected Record: 7.0 - 6.0
Team Profile
Balanced offense, Pass: 47%, Run: 53%
Bad Offense Success Rate of 43%
Bad Offensive Explosiveness
Good in Scoring Position 4.19 PPO
Bad Run Success 44%
Avg Pass Success 42%
Avg OL Grades, Bad OL Yds Per Rush
Good DL Grades, Awful Sacks/Turnovers
Bad Defense Success Rate of 43%
Poor in Scoring Position 4.03 PPO
Awful Run Def Success 48%
Avg Pass Def Success 40%
Bad Pressure/Havoc/Forcing TOs
Bad Field Position
Rutgers has won 3 straight
Rutgers has won 2 straight at Home
Record at home: 4 - 3 (3 - 4 - 0 vs Spread)
Rutgers Notes
(11/18) 2 str W's after bye, outplayed by MD but W
(11/13) Great W (Minn), Def great, QB 240/3 TD's
(11/13) Great W over Minn after bye, had 4 cons L's
(10/19) Def awful, esp vs pass. UCLA 225 yds 1st half
(10/19) Torched by UCLA QB, Off got in gear later
(10/12) Torched by Wisc, Def all 300+ rush yds, QB awful
(10/4) Run Def bottom 20 success rate. Off 60% Runs
(9/27) Beat UW but OG'd by 200+ yds, Rush/3rd Def +
(9/21) Huge W @ VT. Rgame shut down but great Pass D
(9/20) Off is solid, has identity, good QB play, tough
Rutgers Highlights
Rutgers has a great TO Margin (#1)
Rutgers commits very few Penalties (#25)
Rutgers Deficiencies
Rutgers offense is not Explosive (#94)
Rutgers gives up a Lot of Explosive Plays (#117)
| Player Name | COMP | ATT | PCT | YDS | TD | INT | YPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Will Rogers (Tr) | 220 | 311 | 71% | 2458 | 14 | 7 | 7.9 |
| Demond Williams Jr. (Tr) | 82 | 105 | 78% | 944 | 8 | 1 | 9.0 |
| Player Name | CAR | YDS | TD | YPC | LONG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jonah Coleman (Tr) | 193 | 1053 | 10 | 5.5 | 64 |
| Demond Williams Jr. (Tr) | 83 | 282 | 2 | 3.4 | 43 |
| Adam Mohammed (Tr) | 42 | 193 | 0 | 4.6 | 32 |
| Cameron Davis | 44 | 190 | 0 | 4.3 | 20 |
| Player Name | REC | YDS | TD | YPC | LONG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Giles Jackson | 85 | 893 | 7 | 10.5 | 49 |
| Denzel Boston | 63 | 834 | 9 | 13.2 | 51 |
| Jeremiah Hunter (Tr) | 36 | 490 | 1 | 13.6 | 42 |
| Keleki Latu (Tr) | 40 | 371 | 1 | 9.3 | 36 |
| Top Def | Tack | TFL | SACKS | PRESS | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carson Bruener | 104 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 5 |
| Alphonzo Tuputala | 81 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 1 |
| Kamren Fabiculanan | 54 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Sebastian Valdez (Tr) | 49 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| Sacks | Tack | TFL | SACKS | PRESS | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alphonzo Tuputala | 81 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 1 |
| Russell Davis II (Tr) | 4 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Isaiah Ward (Tr) | 28 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 2 |
| Voi Tunuufi | 36 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
| Pass D | Tack | TFL | SACKS | PRESS | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thaddeus Dixon | 43 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| Ephesians Prysock (Tr) | 45 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| Jordan Shaw | 37 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 6 |
| Player Name | COMP | ATT | PCT | YDS | TD | INT | YPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Athan Kaliakmanis (Tr) | 213 | 395 | 54% | 2696 | 18 | 7 | 6.8 |
| Player Name | CAR | YDS | TD | YPC | LONG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kyle Monangai | 256 | 1279 | 13 | 5.0 | 62 |
| Antwan Raymond | 100 | 457 | 8 | 4.6 | 65 |
| Athan Kaliakmanis (Tr) | 92 | 251 | 3 | 2.7 | 20 |
| Samuel Brown V | 40 | 201 | 3 | 5.0 | 37 |
| Player Name | REC | YDS | TD | YPC | LONG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dymere Miller (Tr) | 59 | 757 | 4 | 12.8 | 45 |
| Ian Strong | 42 | 668 | 5 | 15.9 | 65 |
| KJ Duff | 28 | 433 | 1 | 15.5 | 59 |
| Chris Long | 11 | 163 | 1 | 14.8 | 58 |
| Top Def | Tack | TFL | SACKS | PRESS | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dariel Djabome | 100 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 1 |
| Shaquan Loyal | 75 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| Michael Dixon | 60 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Tyreem Powell | 56 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 2 |
| Sacks | Tack | TFL | SACKS | PRESS | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jordan Walker | 19 | 7 | 4 | 4 | 0 |
| Kyonte Hamilton | 32 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 1 |
| Dariel Djabome | 100 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 1 |
| Aaron Lewis | 27 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 2 |
| Pass D | Tack | TFL | SACKS | PRESS | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robert Longerbeam | 42 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 11 |
| Shaquan Loyal | 75 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| Michael Dixon | 60 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 |