Stanford Cardinal at Clemson Tigers
Saturday, September 28th 2024 (7:00 PM EDT)
Clemson -24 (58.0) (-2800) Open: -22.5
Clemson 40 - Stanford: 14 (ACC)
Cardinal (3 - 9) (5 - 6 - 1)
Coach Troy Taylor (3 - 9)
Avg Score : 23 - 34 (21 - 38 on Road)
Record Prediction: 3 - 9 (#114)
Wins: (Elite: ) (Good: ) (Avg: ) (Bad: 0)
Losses: (Elite: ) (Good: ) (Avg: ) (Bad: 0)
Future: (Elite: ) (Good: ) (Avg: ) (Bad: 0)
Coach Troy Taylor (3 - 9)
Avg Score : 23 - 34 (21 - 38 on Road)
Record Prediction: 3 - 9 (#114)
Wins: (Elite: ) (Good: ) (Avg: ) (Bad: 0)
Losses: (Elite: ) (Good: ) (Avg: ) (Bad: 0)
Future: (Elite: ) (Good: ) (Avg: ) (Bad: 0)
STAN 2nd straight Road Game
CLEM 3rd straight Home Game
Our Line: Clemson -22.5 (SP+ CLEM -22)
Projected Score: STAN: 18 - CLEM: 41 (59)
CLEM Win prob: 96% | Cover: 57%
STAN Travel: 2189 miles, 3 hrs behind
CLEM 3rd straight Home Game
Our Line: Clemson -22.5 (SP+ CLEM -22)
Projected Score: STAN: 18 - CLEM: 41 (59)
CLEM Win prob: 96% | Cover: 57%
STAN Travel: 2189 miles, 3 hrs behind
Tigers (10 - 4) (6 - 8 - 0)
Coach Dabo Swinney (170 - 43)
Avg Score : 35 - 23 (43 - 23 @ Home)
Record Prediction: 10 - 4 (#17)
Wins: (Elite: ) (Good: ) (Avg: ) (Bad: 0)
Losses: (Elite: ) (Good: ) (Avg: ) (Bad: 0)
Future: (Elite: ) (Good: ) (Avg: ) (Bad: 0)
Coach Dabo Swinney (170 - 43)
Avg Score : 35 - 23 (43 - 23 @ Home)
Record Prediction: 10 - 4 (#17)
Wins: (Elite: ) (Good: ) (Avg: ) (Bad: 0)
Losses: (Elite: ) (Good: ) (Avg: ) (Bad: 0)
Future: (Elite: ) (Good: ) (Avg: ) (Bad: 0)
| Stanford's 2024 Schedule | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover | |
| Fri 8/30 | Stanford vs TCU | +8.0 | 58.5 | L 27 - 34 | O | Y | |
| Sat 9/7 | Stanford vs Cal Poly | -33.5 | 59.5 | W 41 - 7 | U | Y | |
| BYE WEEK | |||||||
| Fri 9/20 | Stanford at Syracuse | +9.5 | 56.5 | W 26 - 24 | U | Y | |
| Sat 9/28 | Stanford at Clemson | +24.0 | 58.0 | L 14 - 40 | U | N | |
| Sat 10/5 | Stanford vs Virginia Tech | +9.5 | 50.0 | L 7 - 31 | U | N | |
| Sat 10/12 | Stanford at Notre Dame | +22.5 | 45.5 | L 7 - 49 | O | N | |
| Sat 10/19 | Stanford vs SMU | +16.5 | 52.5 | L 10 - 40 | U | N | |
| Sat 10/26 | Stanford vs Wake Forest | +3.0 | 53.0 | L 24 - 27 | U | Y | |
| Sat 11/2 | Stanford at NC State | +10.0 | 46.5 | L 28 - 59 | O | N | |
| BYE WEEK | |||||||
| Sat 11/16 | Stanford vs Louisville | +21.0 | 57.5 | W 38 - 35 | O | Y | |
| Sat 11/23 | Stanford at California | +15.0 | 53.5 | L 21 - 24 | U | Y | |
| Fri 11/29 | Stanford at San José State | +2.5 | 54.5 | L 31 - 34 | O | N | |
Total: Elite: , Good: , Avg , Bad , Poor
Played: Elite: , Good: , Avg , Bad , Poor
Future: Elite: , Good: , Avg , Bad , Poor
Wins: Elite: , Good: , Avg: , Bad: , Poor:
Losses: Elite: , Good: , Avg: , Bad: , Poor:
Predictions for Stanford's Schedule
Played: Elite: , Good: , Avg , Bad , Poor
Future: Elite: , Good: , Avg , Bad , Poor
Wins: Elite: , Good: , Avg: , Bad: , Poor:
Losses: Elite: , Good: , Avg: , Bad: , Poor:
| Clemson's 2024 Schedule | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover | |
| Sat 8/31 | Clemson vs Georgia | +10.5 | 49.0 | L 3 - 34 | U | N | |
| Sat 9/7 | Clemson vs App State | -13.5 | 53.5 | W 66 - 20 | O | Y | |
| BYE WEEK | |||||||
| Sat 9/21 | Clemson vs NC State | -17.0 | 44.0 | W 59 - 35 | O | Y | |
| Sat 9/28 | Clemson vs Stanford | -24.0 | 58.0 | W 40 - 14 | U | Y | |
| Sat 10/5 | Clemson at Florida State | -16.5 | 47.0 | W 29 - 13 | U | N | |
| Sat 10/12 | Clemson at Wake Forest | -21.0 | 63.0 | W 49 - 14 | U | Y | |
| Sat 10/19 | Clemson vs Virginia | -20.0 | 57.5 | W 48 - 31 | O | N | |
| BYE WEEK | |||||||
| Sat 11/2 | Clemson vs Louisville | -11.0 | 62.5 | L 21 - 33 | U | N | |
| Sat 11/9 | Clemson at Virginia Tech | -6.5 | 54.5 | W 24 - 14 | U | Y | |
| Sat 11/16 | Clemson at Pittsburgh | -12.0 | 52.0 | W 24 - 20 | U | N | |
| Sat 11/23 | Clemson vs The Citadel | -49.5 | 58.5 | W 51 - 14 | O | N | |
| Sat 11/30 | Clemson vs South Carolina | -2.5 | 48.5 | L 14 - 17 | U | N | |
| Sat 12/7 | Clemson vs SMU | +2.5 | 56.5 | W 34 - 31 | O | Y | |
| Sat 12/21 | Clemson at Texas | +13.5 | 49.5 | L 24 - 38 | O | N | |
Total: Elite: , Good: , Avg , Bad , Poor
Played: Elite: , Good: , Avg , Bad , Poor
Future: Elite: , Good: , Avg , Bad , Poor
Wins: Elite: , Good: , Avg: , Bad: , Poor:
Losses: Elite: , Good: , Avg: , Bad: , Poor:
Predictions for Clemson's Schedule
Played: Elite: , Good: , Avg , Bad , Poor
Future: Elite: , Good: , Avg , Bad , Poor
Wins: Elite: , Good: , Avg: , Bad: , Poor:
Losses: Elite: , Good: , Avg: , Bad: , Poor:
Important Stats (2024)
| Teams | Off Explosive. | Off Success | PPG | Rush Success | OL Yds Per Att | Rush YPG | Pass Success | Pass YPG | Off ScoreZone | Def Explosive. | Def Success | Def PPG | RunD Success | Pass D Success | Def ScoreZone | Penalty YPG | TO PG | Def TO PG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| STAN | #114 (.1) | 40% (101) | 22.8 | 41% (95) | 2.72 (116) | 134 | 39% (98) | 191 | 3.67 (92) | #120 (.27) | 47% (119) | 33.7 | 45% (92) | 48% (124) | 4.53 (124) | 49 | 1.8 | 1.3 |
| CLEM | #21 (.27) | 47% (24) | 34.7 | 50% (12) | 3.28 (29) | 174 | 45% (36) | 279 | 4.33 (29) | #52 (.14) | 40% (48) | 23.4 | 43% (68) | 38% (36) | 3.64 (48) | 47.6 | 0.7 | 1.9 |
| Teams | Off Explosive. | Off Success | PPG | Rush Success | OL Yds Per Att | Rush YPG | Pass Success | Pass YPG | Off ScoreZone | Def Explosive. | Def Success | Def PPG | RunD Success | Pass D Success | Def ScoreZone | Penalty YPG | TO PG | Def TO PG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| STAN | #114 (.1) | 40% (101) | 41% (95) | 2.72 (116) | 134 | 39% (98) | 191 | 3.67 (92) | #120 (.27) | 47% (119) | 45% (92) | 48% (124) | 4.53 (124) | 49 | 1.8 | 1.3 | ||
| CLEM | #21 (.27) | 47% (24) | 50% (12) | 3.28 (29) | 174 | 45% (36) | 279 | 4.33 (29) | #52 (.14) | 40% (48) | 43% (68) | 38% (36) | 3.64 (48) | 47.6 | 0.7 | 1.9 |
Overall Stats 2024
| Teams | Games | PPG | PPG H/R | Success Rate | Pts PerOpp | TO | 1stD PG | TotalYds PG | RushYds PG | PassYdsPG | RYPA | Run Rate | Pass Rate | Run Success | Pass Success | Havoc Rate | Total PPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| STAN Offense | 12 | 22.8 | 21.2 | 40.1% | 3.67 | 1.8 | 19 | 325 | 134 | 191 | 3.7 | 50% | 50% | 41% | 39% | 22% | .1 |
| CLEM Defense | 14 | 23.4 | 23.4 | 40.1% | 3.64 | 1.9 | - | - | - | - | - | 46% | 53% | 43% | 38% | 19% | .14 |
| Teams | Games | PPG | PPG H/R | Success Rate | Pts PerOpp | TO | 1stD PG | TotalYds PG | RushYds PG | PassYdsPG | RYPA | Run Rate | Pass Rate | Run Success | Pass Success | Havoc Rate | Total PPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| STAN Defense | 12 | 33.7 | 38.3 | 46.6% | 4.53 | 1.3 | - | - | - | - | - | 43% | 57% | 45% | 48% | 14% | .27 |
| CLEM Offense | 14 | 34.7 | 42.7 | 46.7% | 4.33 | 0.7 | 24 | 452 | 174 | 279 | 5.2 | 43% | 56% | 50% | 45% | 13% | .27 |
Additional Stats 2024
| Teams | Games | Possession Time | 1st Downs PG | 3rd Down % | 4th Down % | Penalties PG | Penalty Yds PG | Off TO PG | Def TO PG | TFL PG | Sacks PG | D/ST TDs | Avg Field Pos |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stanford | 12 | 31:41 | 18.5 | 35% | 56% | 5.4 | 49 | 1.8 | 1.3 | 5.3 | 2.1 | 2 | 28.5 |
| Clemson | 14 | 30:29 | 23.9 | 44% | 59% | 4.9 | 47.6 | 0.7 | 1.9 | 6.1 | 2.5 | 2 | 30.1 |
Run Game Stats (2024)
Pass Game Stats (2024)
| Teams | Games | Run Play Rate | Run Play Success | Rush Att PG | Rush Yds PG | Rush Yds Per Att | Rushing TDs | Run Pred Pts Added | OL Yds Per Att | 3rd/4th & Short | Front 7 Havoc | Run Play Explosivness |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| STAN Offense | 12 | 50% (71) | 41% (95) | 36.3 | 133.8 | 3.7 | 11 (116) | .08 (97) | 2.72 (116) | 66% (111) | 15% (131) | 1.01 (52) |
| CLEM Defense | 14 | 46% (20) | 43% (68) | - | - | - | - | .15 (84) | 2.93 (54) | 59% (8) | 11% (38) | 1.12 (119) |
| Teams | Games | Run Play Rate | Run Play Success | Rush Att PG | Rush Yds PG | Rush Yds Per Att | Rushing TDs | Run Pred Pts Added | OL Yds Per Att | 3rd/4th & Short | Front 7 Havoc | Run Play Explosivness |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| STAN Defense | 12 | 43% (4) | 45% (92) | - | - | - | - | .11 (62) | 2.92 (53) | 68% (39) | 10% (58) | 0.99 (70) |
| CLEM Offense | 14 | 43% (113) | 50% (12) | 33.6 | 173.8 | 5.2 | 23 (52) | .24 (19) | 3.28 (29) | 72% (78) | 8% (40) | 0.96 (69) |
Pass Game Stats (2024)
| Teams | Games | PassPlay Rate | PassPlay Success | Comp PG | Att PG | Yds PG | Yds PA | Yds PC | TDs | Ints | PassPlays PPA | PassPlays Expl | PassDowns Rate | PassDowns Succ Rate | PassDowns PPA | DB Havoc | PassDowns Expl |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| STAN Offense | 12 | 50% (64) | 39% (98) | 18.7 | 30.8 | 191.3 | 6.2 | 10.3 | 18 (68) | 17 (127) | .13 (111) | 1.5 (120) | 32% (82) | 26% (116) | .22 (106) | 7% (102) | 2.1 (29) |
| CLEM Defense | 14 | 53% (114) | 38% (36) | - | - | - | - | - | - | 16 (10) | .15 (28) | 1.6 (60) | 35% (26) | 32% (90) | .3 (66) | 8% (20) | 2 (64) |
| Teams | Games | PassPlay Rate | PassPlay Success | Comp PG | Att PG | Yds PG | Yds PA | Yds PC | TDs | Ints | PassPlays PPA | PassPlays Expl | PassDowns Rate | PassDowns Succ Rate | PassDowns PPA | DB Havoc | PassDowns Expl |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| STAN Defense | 12 | 57% (131) | 48% (124) | - | - | - | - | - | - | 9 (76) | .4 (125) | 1.6 (69) | 30% (96) | 34% (113) | .33 (85) | 4% (129) | 2 (51) |
| CLEM Offense | 14 | 56% (23) | 45% (36) | 23.6 | 37.8 | 278.5 | 7.4 | 11.8 | 37 (2) | 7 (26) | .33 (38) | 1.5 (79) | 30% (39) | 38% (6) | .58 (4) | 5% (21) | 2.1 (39) |
Stanford's Power Ratings
Stanford's Power Rating: -4.38 #79
Stanford's Offense Rating: 18.63 #80
Stanford's Defense Rating: 15.49 #112
2024 Talent Rating: 96.00 #1
Blue Chip Ratio: 12% #35
Stanford's 2024 Expected Record: 3.0 - 9.0
Stanford's 2024 Overall SP+ Rating: -8.2 #101
Stanford's Offense SP+ Rating: 24.4 #90
Stanford's Defense SP+ Rating: 34.1 #112
Average Talent
Average ACC Talent Rating is 96
Average Power Five Talent: 96
Average FBS Talent: 96
Stanford's Power Rating: -4.38 #79
Stanford's Offense Rating: 18.63 #80
Stanford's Defense Rating: 15.49 #112
2024 Talent Rating: 96.00 #1
Blue Chip Ratio: 12% #35
Stanford's 2024 Expected Record: 3.0 - 9.0
Stanford's 2024 Overall SP+ Rating: -8.2 #101
Stanford's Offense SP+ Rating: 24.4 #90
Stanford's Defense SP+ Rating: 34.1 #112
Average Talent
Average ACC Talent Rating is 96
Average Power Five Talent: 96
Average FBS Talent: 96
Power Ratings Matchup
Stanford: -4.38 Clemson: 16.1
SP+ Ratings Matchup
Stanford: -8.2 Clemson: 13.3
Stanford: -4.38 Clemson: 16.1
SP+ Ratings Matchup
Stanford: -8.2 Clemson: 13.3
Clemson's Power Ratings
Clemson's Power Rating: 16.1 #17
Clemson's Offense Rating: 25.96 #15
Clemson's Defense Rating: 7.50 #47
2024 Talent Rating: 96.00 #1
Blue Chip Ratio: 58 #6
Clemson's 2024 Expected Record: 10.0 - 4.0
Clemson's 2024 Overall SP+ Rating: 13.3 #22
Clemson's Offense SP+ Rating: 35.4 #16
Clemson's Defense SP+ Rating: 20.9 #26
Average Talent
Average ACC Talent Rating is 96
Average Power Five Talent: 96
Average FBS Talent: 96
Clemson's Power Rating: 16.1 #17
Clemson's Offense Rating: 25.96 #15
Clemson's Defense Rating: 7.50 #47
2024 Talent Rating: 96.00 #1
Blue Chip Ratio: 58 #6
Clemson's 2024 Expected Record: 10.0 - 4.0
Clemson's 2024 Overall SP+ Rating: 13.3 #22
Clemson's Offense SP+ Rating: 35.4 #16
Clemson's Defense SP+ Rating: 20.9 #26
Average Talent
Average ACC Talent Rating is 96
Average Power Five Talent: 96
Average FBS Talent: 96
Stanford Scoring
Offense: 22.8 PPG
Offense on Road: 21.2
Defense: 33.7 PPG
Defense on Road: 38.3
Stanford's 2024 Record
Record: 3 - 9
Record vs Spread: 5 - 6 - 1
Record on Road: 1 - 5
Record vs Spread on Road: 2 - 4 - 0
Record as Dog vs Spread: 4 - 6 - 1
Record as Road Dog vs Spread: 2 - 4 - 0
Offense: 22.8 PPG
Offense on Road: 21.2
Defense: 33.7 PPG
Defense on Road: 38.3
Stanford's 2024 Record
Record: 3 - 9
Record vs Spread: 5 - 6 - 1
Record on Road: 1 - 5
Record vs Spread on Road: 2 - 4 - 0
Record as Dog vs Spread: 4 - 6 - 1
Record as Road Dog vs Spread: 2 - 4 - 0
Projected Score
Clemson 41
Stanford 18
Total Points: 59
Clemson 41
Stanford 18
Total Points: 59
Clemson Scoring
Offense: 34.7 PPG
Offense at Home: 42.7
Defense: 23.4 PPG
Defense at Home: 23.4
Clemson's 2024 Record
Record: 10 - 4
Record vs Spread: 6 - 8 - 0
Record at home: 5 - 2
Record vs Spread at home: 3 - 4 - 0
Record as Fav vs Spread: 5 - 6 - 0
Record as Home Fav vs Spread: 3 - 4 - 0
Offense: 34.7 PPG
Offense at Home: 42.7
Defense: 23.4 PPG
Defense at Home: 23.4
Clemson's 2024 Record
Record: 10 - 4
Record vs Spread: 6 - 8 - 0
Record at home: 5 - 2
Record vs Spread at home: 3 - 4 - 0
Record as Fav vs Spread: 5 - 6 - 0
Record as Home Fav vs Spread: 3 - 4 - 0
| Year | Date | Home | Score | Away | Score | Winner | Spread | Cover | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 09/28 | Clemson | 40 | Stanford | 14 | Clemson | Clemson -24 | Clemson | 58.0 | Under |
| Team | Wins | Covers | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clemson | 1 | 1 | 0 Overs |
| Stanford | 0 | 0 | 1 Unders |
| Wins | Covers | Favs | Dogs | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home Teams | 1 - 0 | 1 - 0 | 1 - 0 | 0 - 0 |
| Road Teams | 0 - 1 | 0 - 1 | 0 - 0 | 0 - 1 |
(#79) Stanford Info
Power Rating: -4.38 #79
Offense Rating: 18.63 #80
Defense Rating: 15.49 #112
Overall SP+ Rating: -8.2 #101
Offense SP+ Rating: 24.4 #90
Defense SP+ Rating: 34.1 #112
Talent Rating: 96.00 #1
Blue Chip Ratio: 12% #35
Expected Record: 3.0 - 9.0
Team Profile
Balanced offense, Pass: 50%, Run: 50%
Poor Offense Success Rate of 40%
Awful Offensive Explosiveness
Poor in Scoring Position 3.67 PPO
Poor Run Success 41%
Poor Pass Success 39%
Bad OL Grades, Awful OL Yds Per Rush
Avg DL Grades, Avg Sacks/Turnovers
Awful Defense Success Rate of 47%
Awful in Scoring Position 4.53 PPO
Poor Run Def Success 45%
Awful Pass Def Success 48%
Poor Pressure/Havoc/Forcing TOs
Avg Field Position
Stanford has won 2 straight
Stanford has won 1 straight on the Road
Record on Road: 1 - 5 (2 - 4 - 0 vs Spread )
Stanford Notes
(11/29) Taylor 6-18 in 2 years, but is Stan serious?
(11/23) Daniels awful vs Cal, Rgame bad. Rough L
(11/18) At this pt why is 4 star QB Brown not playing?
(11/18) QB Daniels torched L'ville, Rgame awful, D held on
(11/18) Mosley V emerging top WR. 13/168/3 TD vs L'ville
(10/21) QB Daniels inj in SMU game, looks out for Wake
(10/20) Lost 11 straight at home vs FBS into Wake game
(10/12) 3 straight routs, Off v limited, Def wilts eventually
(9/23) QB Daniels limited but mobile QB. Rgame better?
(8/31) Def looked improved vs TCU, opportunistic
Stanford Highlights
Stanford Stuffs a lot of Run Plays (#79)
Stanford Deficiencies
Stanford has a bad TO Margin (#82)
Stanford throws a Lot of Interceptions (#92)
Stanford offense is really bad (#118)
Stanford Runs Get Stuffed a Lot (#64)
Stanford offense is bad on 3rd Downs
Stanford Defense Gives up a Lot of Points
Stanford has a bad defense (#92)
Stanford gives up a Lot of Explosive Plays (#22)
Stanford has a bad red zone defense (#39)
Power Rating: -4.38 #79
Offense Rating: 18.63 #80
Defense Rating: 15.49 #112
Overall SP+ Rating: -8.2 #101
Offense SP+ Rating: 24.4 #90
Defense SP+ Rating: 34.1 #112
Talent Rating: 96.00 #1
Blue Chip Ratio: 12% #35
Expected Record: 3.0 - 9.0
Team Profile
Balanced offense, Pass: 50%, Run: 50%
Poor Offense Success Rate of 40%
Awful Offensive Explosiveness
Poor in Scoring Position 3.67 PPO
Poor Run Success 41%
Poor Pass Success 39%
Bad OL Grades, Awful OL Yds Per Rush
Avg DL Grades, Avg Sacks/Turnovers
Awful Defense Success Rate of 47%
Awful in Scoring Position 4.53 PPO
Poor Run Def Success 45%
Awful Pass Def Success 48%
Poor Pressure/Havoc/Forcing TOs
Avg Field Position
Stanford has won 2 straight
Stanford has won 1 straight on the Road
Record on Road: 1 - 5 (2 - 4 - 0 vs Spread )
Stanford Notes
(11/29) Taylor 6-18 in 2 years, but is Stan serious?
(11/23) Daniels awful vs Cal, Rgame bad. Rough L
(11/18) At this pt why is 4 star QB Brown not playing?
(11/18) QB Daniels torched L'ville, Rgame awful, D held on
(11/18) Mosley V emerging top WR. 13/168/3 TD vs L'ville
(10/21) QB Daniels inj in SMU game, looks out for Wake
(10/20) Lost 11 straight at home vs FBS into Wake game
(10/12) 3 straight routs, Off v limited, Def wilts eventually
(9/23) QB Daniels limited but mobile QB. Rgame better?
(8/31) Def looked improved vs TCU, opportunistic
Stanford Highlights
Stanford Stuffs a lot of Run Plays (#79)
Stanford Deficiencies
Stanford has a bad TO Margin (#82)
Stanford throws a Lot of Interceptions (#92)
Stanford offense is really bad (#118)
Stanford Runs Get Stuffed a Lot (#64)
Stanford offense is bad on 3rd Downs
Stanford Defense Gives up a Lot of Points
Stanford has a bad defense (#92)
Stanford gives up a Lot of Explosive Plays (#22)
Stanford has a bad red zone defense (#39)
| Performance GradesPerf Grades | ||
|---|---|---|
| CategoryCat | CLEM | STAN |
| OverallOver | #25 | #80 |
| OffenseOff | #33 | #97 |
| DefenseDef | #26 | #86 |
| Special TeamsST | #34 | #6 |
| PassingPass | #10 | #96 |
| RushingRush | #28 | #95 |
| Run BlockRBLK | #50 | #84 |
| Pass BlockPBLK | #54 | #80 |
| Route RunningWR Rt | #54 | #77 |
| TacklingTkl | #80 | #84 |
| Run DefenseR Def | #35 | #75 |
| Pass Rush DefPRush | #35 | #48 |
| Coverage DefCov | #34 | #95 |
(#17) Clemson Info
Power Rating: 16.1 #17
Offense Rating: 25.96 #15
Defense Rating: 7.50 #47
Overall SP+ Rating: 13.3 #22
Offense SP+ Rating: 35.4 #16
Defense SP+ Rating: 20.9 #26
Talent Rating: 96.00 #1
Blue Chip Ratio: 58 #6
Expected Record: 10.0 - 4.0
Team Profile
Pass heavy Offense 56%, Run: 43%
Good Offense Success Rate of 47%
Great Offensive Explosiveness
Good in Scoring Position 4.33 PPO
Great Run Success 50%
Good Pass Success 45%
Avg OL Grades, Good OL Yds Per Rush
Good DL Grades, Good Sacks/Turnovers
Avg Defense Success Rate of 40%
Avg in Scoring Position 3.64 PPO
Bad Run Def Success 43%
Good Pass Def Success 38%
Great Pressure/Havoc/Forcing TOs
Bad Field Position
Clemson has won 2 straight
Clemson has won 2 straight at Home
Record at home: 5 - 2 (3 - 4 - 0 vs Spread)
Clemson Highlights
Clemson has Really Good Running Game (#118)
Clemson offense is efficent (#84)
Clemson has a top Offensive Line (#65)
Clemson offense is good in red zone (#101)
Clemson Defense Sacks the QB a lot
Clemson Secondary is very good (#76)
Clemson has a great TO Margin (#107)
Clemson defense Intercepts a lot of Passes (#28)
Clemson Deficiencies
Clemson gives up a Lot of Explosive Plays (#65)
Power Rating: 16.1 #17
Offense Rating: 25.96 #15
Defense Rating: 7.50 #47
Overall SP+ Rating: 13.3 #22
Offense SP+ Rating: 35.4 #16
Defense SP+ Rating: 20.9 #26
Talent Rating: 96.00 #1
Blue Chip Ratio: 58 #6
Expected Record: 10.0 - 4.0
Team Profile
Pass heavy Offense 56%, Run: 43%
Good Offense Success Rate of 47%
Great Offensive Explosiveness
Good in Scoring Position 4.33 PPO
Great Run Success 50%
Good Pass Success 45%
Avg OL Grades, Good OL Yds Per Rush
Good DL Grades, Good Sacks/Turnovers
Avg Defense Success Rate of 40%
Avg in Scoring Position 3.64 PPO
Bad Run Def Success 43%
Good Pass Def Success 38%
Great Pressure/Havoc/Forcing TOs
Bad Field Position
Clemson has won 2 straight
Clemson has won 2 straight at Home
Record at home: 5 - 2 (3 - 4 - 0 vs Spread)
Clemson Highlights
Clemson has Really Good Running Game (#118)
Clemson offense is efficent (#84)
Clemson has a top Offensive Line (#65)
Clemson offense is good in red zone (#101)
Clemson Defense Sacks the QB a lot
Clemson Secondary is very good (#76)
Clemson has a great TO Margin (#107)
Clemson defense Intercepts a lot of Passes (#28)
Clemson Deficiencies
Clemson gives up a Lot of Explosive Plays (#65)
| Player Name | COMP | ATT | PCT | YDS | TD | INT | YPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ashton Daniels | 170 | 271 | 63% | 1700 | 10 | 12 | 6.3 |
| Elijah Brown | 28 | 48 | 58% | 274 | 2 | 3 | 5.7 |
| Player Name | CAR | YDS | TD | YPC | LONG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ashton Daniels | 148 | 669 | 3 | 4.5 | 67 |
| Micah Ford | 76 | 309 | 0 | 4.1 | 26 |
| Chris Davis Jr. | 54 | 288 | 0 | 5.3 | 47 |
| Cole Tabb | 27 | 130 | 0 | 4.8 | 39 |
| Player Name | REC | YDS | TD | YPC | LONG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elic Ayomanor | 63 | 831 | 6 | 13.2 | 60 |
| Emmett Mosley V | 48 | 525 | 6 | 10.9 | 62 |
| Sam Roush | 40 | 334 | 2 | 8.4 | 28 |
| Ismael Cisse | 26 | 241 | 2 | 9.3 | 25 |
| Top Def | Tack | TFL | SACKS | PRESS | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gaethan Bernadel | 86 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 1 |
| Scotty Edwards | 80 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Tristan Sinclair | 77 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 1 |
| Mitch Leigber | 54 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Sacks | Tack | TFL | SACKS | PRESS | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Bailey | 31 | 8 | 6 | 8 | 0 |
| Tevarua Tafiti | 41 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 0 |
| Tobin Phillips | 16 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 |
| Zach Buckey | 11 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| Pass D | Tack | TFL | SACKS | PRESS | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Collin Wright | 45 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Aaron Morris | 32 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Zahran Manley | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Player Name | COMP | ATT | PCT | YDS | TD | INT | YPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cade Klubnik | 308 | 486 | 63% | 3639 | 36 | 6 | 7.5 |
| Christopher Vizzina | 19 | 34 | 56% | 190 | 0 | 0 | 5.6 |
| Player Name | CAR | YDS | TD | YPC | LONG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phil Mafah | 216 | 1115 | 8 | 5.2 | 83 |
| Cade Klubnik | 119 | 462 | 7 | 3.9 | 55 |
| Jay Haynes | 43 | 295 | 3 | 6.9 | 70 |
| Keith Adams Jr. | 30 | 122 | 1 | 4.1 | 18 |
| Player Name | REC | YDS | TD | YPC | LONG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antonio Williams | 74 | 902 | 11 | 12.2 | 57 |
| Bryant Wesco Jr. | 41 | 708 | 5 | 17.3 | 76 |
| T.J. Moore | 45 | 651 | 5 | 14.5 | 41 |
| Jake Briningstool | 49 | 530 | 7 | 10.8 | 41 |
| Top Def | Tack | TFL | SACKS | PRESS | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wade Woodaz | 75 | 9 | 3 | 9 | 4 |
| Barrett Carter | 74 | 10 | 4 | 7 | 6 |
| R.J. Mickens | 68 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 7 |
| Sammy Brown | 66 | 12 | 5 | 2 | 2 |
| Sacks | Tack | TFL | SACKS | PRESS | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T.J. Parker | 50 | 17 | 11 | 5 | 1 |
| Sammy Brown | 66 | 12 | 5 | 2 | 2 |
| Barrett Carter | 74 | 10 | 4 | 7 | 6 |
| Peter Woods | 26 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 0 |
| Pass D | Tack | TFL | SACKS | PRESS | PD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Avieon Terrell | 49 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 11 |
| R.J. Mickens | 68 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 7 |
| Barrett Carter | 74 | 10 | 4 | 7 | 6 |