Sat, Nov 13 2021
·
Week 11
·
🏟 Jones AT&T Stadium
Lubbock, TX
·
Turf
·
60,862 cap
Iowa State✈ 734 miSame TZ
Matchup Prediction
Iowa State
has the edge in this matchup
Both Momentum Control (CSS) and Game Control metrics favor
Iowa State entering this game.
Momentum Control
61.3%
Iowa State wins
Lean
Game Control
64.9%
Iowa State wins
Lean
Vegas Spread
Iowa State -13
O/U 55.5
teamrankings
Advanced Stats
All 4 factors agree → Iowa State
· 83.1% ATS historically when all four align
↓ See full breakdown
Iowa State 2021 Schedule
Iowa State's 2021 Schedule
| Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 9/4 | Iowa State vs Northern Iowa | -28.5W16–10 | 50.0 | W16–10 | U | N |
| Sat 9/11 | Iowa State vs Iowa | -4.0L17–27 | 45.0 | L17–27 | U | N |
| Sat 9/18 | Iowa State at UNLV | -32.0W48–3 | 53.0 | W48–3 | U | Y |
| Sat 9/25 | Iowa State at Baylor | -7.0L29–31 | 46.0 | L29–31 | O | N |
| Sat 10/2 | Iowa State vs Kansas | -34.5W59–7 | 57.5 | W59–7 | O | Y |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Sat 10/16 | Iowa State at Kansas State | -6.5W33–20 | 51.0 | W33–20 | O | Y |
| Sat 10/23 | Iowa State vs Oklahoma State | -7.5W24–21 | 47.0 | W24–21 | U | N |
| Sat 10/30 | Iowa State at West Virginia | -7.5L31–38 | 49.0 | L31–38 | O | N |
| Sat 11/6 | Iowa State vs Texas | -6.0W30–7 | 59.5 | W30–7 | U | Y |
| Sat 11/13 | Iowa State at Texas Tech | -13.0L38–41 | 55.5 | L38–41 | O | N |
| Sat 11/20 | Iowa State at Oklahoma | +3.0L21–28 | 59.0 | L21–28 | U | N |
| Fri 11/26 | Iowa State vs TCU | -16.0W48–14 | 61.5 | W48–14 | O | Y |
| Wed 12/29 | Iowa State vs Clemson | +1.5L13–20 | 44.0 | L13–20 | U | N |
Texas Tech 2021 Schedule
Texas Tech's 2021 Schedule
| Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 9/4 | Texas Tech vs Houston | +2.5W38–21 | 63.0 | W38–21 | U | Y |
| Sat 9/11 | Texas Tech vs Stephen F. Austin | -31.5W28–22 | 51.5 | W28–22 | U | N |
| Sat 9/18 | Texas Tech vs Florida International | -20.5W54–21 | 54.0 | W54–21 | O | Y |
| Sat 9/25 | Texas Tech at Texas | +9.0L35–70 | 63.0 | L35–70 | O | N |
| Sat 10/2 | Texas Tech at West Virginia | +7.5W23–20 | 55.0 | W23–20 | U | Y |
| Sat 10/9 | Texas Tech vs TCU | +2.5L31–52 | 60.0 | L31–52 | O | N |
| Sat 10/16 | Texas Tech at Kansas | -18.5W41–14 | 67.5 | W41–14 | U | Y |
| Sat 10/23 | Texas Tech vs Kansas State | +1.0L24–25 | 60.5 | L24–25 | U | Y |
| Sat 10/30 | Texas Tech at Oklahoma | +18.5L21–52 | 67.0 | L21–52 | O | N |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Sat 11/13 | Texas Tech vs Iowa State | +13.0W41–38 | 55.5 | W41–38 | O | Y |
| Sat 11/20 | Texas Tech vs Oklahoma State | +10.0L0–23 | 55.0 | L0–23 | U | N |
| Sat 11/27 | Texas Tech at Baylor | +14.0L24–27 | 51.5 | L24–27 | U | Y |
| Tue 12/28 | Texas Tech vs Mississippi State | +10.0W34–7 | 58.5 | W34–7 | U | Y |
Advanced Stats
Advanced Analytics Matchup
Matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense) ·
2021 season
Agreement Signals — When All Metrics Agree
Elite · 83.1% ATS
PPA + PPO + SR + Havoc
All 4 Agree
→ Iowa State
Elite · 82.4% ATS
PPA + PPO + Havoc
3 Agree
→ Iowa State
Elite · 73.9% ATS
PPA + Success Rate
Both Agree
→ Iowa State
Individual Factors — Ranked by Predictive Strength
PPA Overall
Points added per play · Elite predictor
PPA Passing
Pass efficiency edge · Strong predictor
Havoc Total
Def. disruption rate · Strong predictor
TFLs, sacks, PBUs, forced fumbles — higher is better
Points Per Opp
Drive-finishing edge · Strong predictor
Success Rate
Play consistency edge · Solid predictor
Field Position
Avg start (lower=better) · Solid predictor
Avg yards from own endzone to average start — lower is better · longer bar = better field position
Advanced stats sourced from CFBD · 2021 season ·
Edges are matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense)
Power Ratings
Team Power Ratings
Overall · Offense · Defense ratings · Updated as season progresses
Power ratings updated throughout the season as results accumulate
Momentum Control (CSS)
Consecutive Scoring Sequences
Who builds scoring momentum?
Iowa State Edge
Iowa State +0.42
CSS Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 61.3% of games historically
Based on 9 games this season
Game Control (GC)
Win Probability Dominance
Who controls games start to finish?
Iowa State Edge
Iowa State +13.3
GC Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 64.9% of games historically
Based on 9 games this season
Actual Result
CSS Battle
Tie
2 — 2 sequences
✗ Predicted incorrectly
GC Battle
Texas Tech
63.7 — 19.7 GC score
✗ Predicted incorrectly
Game Result
Texas Tech won by 3
✗ Model missed it
Spread Context
ATS Historical Context
Based on 2021–2025 backtest · FBS vs FBS · Regular season
Both metrics agree on Iowa State with a solid GC edge. Teams with this profile have covered 53.0% of the time historically (n=330) — a mild lean.
ATS data is informational only. Past cover rates do not guarantee future results.
Coaching Matchup
Iowa State
Matt Campbell #1
37–29 (56%)
· Yr 6 at school
OC
Tom Manning
Yr 1
#1
DC
Jon Heacock
Yr 1
#1
Texas Tech
Sonny Cumbie #1
11–14 (44%)
· Yr 3 at school
OC
Sonny Cumbie
Yr 1
#1
DC
Keith Patterson
Yr 1
#1
About these metrics
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games. ✓
Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: Momentum Control is a great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: Game Control is another great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself ✓
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games. ✓
Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: Momentum Control is a great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: Game Control is another great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself ✓

