Ohio at Ball State Week 6 College Football Matchup Ohio at Ball State Matchup - Week 6
Sat, Oct 4 2025 · Week 6 · 🏟 Scheumann Stadium Muncie, IN · Turf · 22,500 cap
Ohio✈ 186 miSame TZ
Away
14 20
Final
Home
📊 Punt & Rally Projection
Ohio
32
OHIO -14
Ball State
18
P&R Line Ohio -14.5
P&R Total O/U 50
Confidence 90 High
Vegas Ohio -14 · O/U 52.5
Matchup Prediction
Ohio has the edge in this matchup
Both Momentum Control (CSS) and Game Control metrics favor Ohio entering this game.
Momentum Control
61.3%
Ohio wins
Lean
Game Control
75.9%
Ohio wins
Solid
Vegas Spread
Ohio -14
O/U 52.5
DraftKings
Advanced Stats
All 4 factors agree → Ohio · 83.1% ATS historically when all four align
↓ See full breakdown
🛋 Ball State Coming off BYE
Ohio 2025 Schedule
Ohio's 2025 Schedule
DateMatchupSpreadTotalResultO/UCover
Thu 8/28Ohio at Rutgers+11.5L31–3446.5L31–34OY
Sat 9/6Ohio vs West Virginia+3.5W17–1058.5W17–10UY
Sat 9/13Ohio at Ohio State+28.0L9–3749.0L9–37UY
Sat 9/20Ohio vs Gardner-Webb-30.5W52–3555.0W52–35ON
Sat 9/27Ohio vs Bowling Green-7.5W35–2049.5W35–20OY
Sat 10/4Ohio at Ball State-14.0L14–2052.5L14–20UN
— Bye Week —
Sat 10/18Ohio vs Northern Illinois-10.5W48–2141.5W48–21OY
Sat 10/25Ohio at Eastern Michigan-11.5W28–2160.5W28–21UN
— Bye Week —
Tue 11/4Ohio vs Miami (OH)-2.5W24–2050.5W24–20UY
Tue 11/11Ohio at Western Michigan+1.5L13–1746.5L13–17UN
Tue 11/18Ohio vs Massachusetts-34.5W42–1453.5W42–14ON
Fri 11/28Ohio at Buffalo-7.0W31–2644.5W31–26ON
Tue 12/23Ohio vs UNLV+6.5W17–1064.5W17–10UY
Ball State 2025 Schedule
Ball State's 2025 Schedule
DateMatchupSpreadTotalResultO/UCover
Sat 8/30Ball State at Purdue+16.5L0–3150.5L0–31UN
Sat 9/6Ball State at Auburn+43.0L3–4252.5L3–42UY
Sat 9/13Ball State vs New Hampshire-3.0W34–2946.5W34–29OY
Sat 9/20Ball State at UConn+21.0L25–3153.5L25–31OY
— Bye Week —
Sat 10/4Ball State vs Ohio+14.0W20–1452.5W20–14UY
Sat 10/11Ball State at Western Michigan+9.5L0–4243.5L0–42UN
Sat 10/18Ball State vs Akron+2.5W42–2844.5W42–28OY
Sat 10/25Ball State at Northern Illinois+6.5L7–2141.5L7–21UN
— Bye Week —
Wed 11/5Ball State vs Kent State-3.0W17–1348.5W17–13UY
Sat 11/15Ball State vs Eastern Michigan+2.5L9–2448.5L9–24UN
Sat 11/22Ball State at Toledo+29.5L9–3845.5L9–38OY
Sat 11/29Ball State at Miami (OH)+16.5L24–4540.5L24–45ON
Advanced Stats
Advanced Analytics Matchup
Matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense) · 2025 season
Ohio PPA Edge
Agreement Signals — When All Metrics Agree
Elite · 83.1% ATS
PPA + PPO + SR + Havoc
All 4 Agree
→ Ohio
Elite · 82.4% ATS
PPA + PPO + Havoc
3 Agree
→ Ohio
Elite · 73.9% ATS
PPA + Success Rate
Both Agree
→ Ohio
Individual Factors — Ranked by Predictive Strength
PPA Overall
Points added per play · Elite predictor
Ohio #42
+0.387
Ball State #134
+0.120
Ohio Edge
PPA Passing
Pass efficiency edge · Strong predictor
Ohio #60
+0.575
Ball State #136
+0.178
Ohio Edge
Havoc Total
Def. disruption rate · Strong predictor
Ohio #86
0.149
Ball State #105
0.140
TFLs, sacks, PBUs, forced fumbles — higher is better
Ohio Edge
Points Per Opp
Drive-finishing edge · Strong predictor
Ohio #84
+7.111
Ball State #132
+5.540
Ohio Edge
Success Rate
Play consistency edge · Solid predictor
Ohio #41
+0.894
Ball State #136
+0.740
Ohio Edge
Field Position
Avg start (lower=better) · Solid predictor
Ohio #49
70.1
Ball State #106
72.3
Avg yards from own endzone to average start — lower is better · longer bar = better field position
Ohio Edge
Advanced stats sourced from CFBD · 2025 season · Edges are matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense)
Power Ratings
Team Power Ratings
Overall · Offense · Defense ratings · Updated as season progresses
Ohio Rated Higher
Overall Power Rating
Ohio
-10.3
Ball State
-21.7
Offense Rating
Ohio
7.5
Ball State
5.9
Defense Rating (lower = better defense)
Ohio
17.7
Ball State
27.6
Power ratings updated throughout the season as results accumulate
Momentum Control (CSS)
Consecutive Scoring Sequences Who builds scoring momentum? Ohio Edge
Avg sequences created per game
Ohio #67
0.50
Ball State #127
0.00
Avg sequences allowed per game (lower is better)
Ohio #102
1.00
Ball State #38
1.33
Ohio +0.50
CSS Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 61.3% of games historically
Based on 3 games this season
Game Control (GC)
Win Probability Dominance Who controls games start to finish? Ohio Edge
Avg GC score per game (offense)
Ohio #1
46.1
Ball State #1
19.5
Avg GC score allowed per game (lower is better)
Ohio #29
39.6
Ball State #133
68.5
Ohio +26.6
GC Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 75.9% of games historically
Based on 4 games this season
Actual Result
CSS Battle
Ball State
1 — 0 sequences
✗ Predicted incorrectly
GC Battle
Ohio
17.1 — 61.8 GC score
✓ Predicted correctly
Game Result
Ball State won by 6
✗ Model missed it
Spread Context
ATS Historical Context
Based on 2021–2025 backtest · FBS vs FBS · Regular season

Both metrics agree on Ohio with a large edge. Historically, dominant teams like this are fully priced into the spread — the agreed-upon team covers just 50.2% of the time. The metrics predict game control better than they beat the number.

ATS data is informational only. Past cover rates do not guarantee future results.

Coaching Matchup
Ohio
Brian Smith #1
1–0 (100%) · Yr 1 at school
OC Scott Isphording Yr 2 #1
DC John Hauser Yr 2 #1
Staff Rating
0.00 #1
Ball State
Mike Uremovich #1
0–0 (0%) · Yr 1 at school
OC Mike Uremovich Yr 1 #1
DC Jeff Knowles Yr 2 #1
Staff Rating
0.00 #1
About these metrics
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games.

Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: Momentum Control is a great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set.

Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: Game Control is another great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set.

Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself