Sat, Oct 30 2021
·
Week 9
·
🏟 UB Stadium
Amherst, NY
·
Turf
·
29,013 cap
Bowling Green✈ 272 miSame TZ
Matchup Prediction
Buffalo
has the edge in this matchup
Both Momentum Control (CSS) and Game Control metrics favor
Buffalo entering this game.
Momentum Control
71.6%
Buffalo wins
Solid
Game Control
67.1%
Buffalo wins
Solid
Vegas Spread
Buffalo -13.5
O/U 51.5
teamrankings
Advanced Stats
Advanced factors are split · No strong agreement signal
↓ See full breakdown
Bowling Green 2021 Schedule
Bowling Green's 2021 Schedule
| Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 9/2 | Bowling Green at Tennessee | +37.0L6–38 | 60.5 | L6–38 | U | Y |
| Sat 9/11 | Bowling Green vs South Alabama | +14.5L19–22 | 48.0 | L19–22 | U | Y |
| Sat 9/18 | Bowling Green vs Murray State | +2.5W27–10 | 44.0 | W27–10 | U | Y |
| Sat 9/25 | Bowling Green at Minnesota | +30.5W14–10 | 52.5 | W14–10 | U | Y |
| Sat 10/2 | Bowling Green at Kent State | +16.5L20–27 | 56.0 | L20–27 | U | Y |
| Sat 10/9 | Bowling Green vs Akron | -14.0L20–35 | 46.0 | L20–35 | O | N |
| Sat 10/16 | Bowling Green at Northern Illinois | +9.0L26–34 | 44.5 | L26–34 | O | Y |
| Sat 10/23 | Bowling Green vs Eastern Michigan | +4.5L24–55 | 49.5 | L24–55 | O | N |
| Sat 10/30 | Bowling Green at Buffalo | +13.5W56–44 | 51.5 | W56–44 | O | Y |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Wed 11/10 | Bowling Green vs Toledo | +10.5L17–49 | 50.0 | L17–49 | O | N |
| Tue 11/16 | Bowling Green at Miami (OH) | +17.0L7–34 | 52.0 | L7–34 | U | N |
| Fri 11/26 | Bowling Green vs Ohio | +6.0W21–10 | 48.0 | W21–10 | U | Y |
Buffalo 2021 Schedule
Buffalo's 2021 Schedule
| Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 9/2 | Buffalo vs Wagner | -44.0W69–7 | 54.5 | W69–7 | O | Y |
| Sat 9/11 | Buffalo at Nebraska | +13.5L3–28 | 54.0 | L3–28 | U | N |
| Sat 9/18 | Buffalo vs Coastal Carolina | +14.0L25–28 | 58.0 | L25–28 | U | Y |
| Sat 9/25 | Buffalo at Old Dominion | -13.0W35–34 | 50.5 | W35–34 | O | N |
| Sat 10/2 | Buffalo vs Western Michigan | +7.0L17–24 | 59.5 | L17–24 | U | Y |
| Sat 10/9 | Buffalo at Kent State | +7.0L38–48 | 66.0 | L38–48 | O | N |
| Sat 10/16 | Buffalo vs Ohio | -7.5W27–26 | 54.5 | W27–26 | U | N |
| Sat 10/23 | Buffalo at Akron | -13.5W45–10 | 58.5 | W45–10 | U | Y |
| Sat 10/30 | Buffalo vs Bowling Green | -13.5L44–56 | 51.5 | L44–56 | O | N |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Tue 11/9 | Buffalo at Miami (OH) | +7.0L18–45 | 58.0 | L18–45 | O | N |
| Wed 11/17 | Buffalo vs Northern Illinois | +2.0L27–33 | 59.5 | L27–33 | O | N |
| Tue 11/23 | Buffalo at Ball State | +6.0L3–20 | 59.5 | L3–20 | U | N |
Advanced Stats
Advanced Analytics Matchup
Matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense) ·
2021 season
Agreement Signals — When All Metrics Agree
Elite · 83.1% ATS
PPA + PPO + SR + Havoc
Split
Metrics disagree
Elite · 82.4% ATS
PPA + PPO + Havoc
Split
Metrics disagree
Elite · 73.9% ATS
PPA + Success Rate
Split
Metrics disagree
Individual Factors — Ranked by Predictive Strength
PPA Overall
Points added per play · Elite predictor
PPA Passing
Pass efficiency edge · Strong predictor
Havoc Total
Def. disruption rate · Strong predictor
TFLs, sacks, PBUs, forced fumbles — higher is better
Points Per Opp
Drive-finishing edge · Strong predictor
Success Rate
Play consistency edge · Solid predictor
Field Position
Avg start (lower=better) · Solid predictor
Avg yards from own endzone to average start — lower is better · longer bar = better field position
Advanced stats sourced from CFBD · 2021 season ·
Edges are matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense)
Power Ratings
Team Power Ratings
Overall · Offense · Defense ratings · Updated as season progresses
Power ratings updated throughout the season as results accumulate
Momentum Control (CSS)
Consecutive Scoring Sequences
Who builds scoring momentum?
Buffalo Edge
Buffalo +1.21
CSS Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 71.6% of games historically
Based on 7 games this season
Game Control (GC)
Win Probability Dominance
Who controls games start to finish?
Buffalo Edge
Buffalo +15.5
GC Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 67.1% of games historically
Based on 8 games this season
Actual Result
CSS Battle
Buffalo
1 — 0 sequences
✓ Predicted correctly
GC Battle
Bowling Green
15.7 — 73.2 GC score
✗ Predicted incorrectly
Game Result
Bowling Green won by 12
✗ Model missed it
Spread Context
ATS Historical Context
Based on 2021–2025 backtest · FBS vs FBS · Regular season
Both metrics agree on Buffalo with a moderate edge in both. This is the strongest ATS signal in our backtest: teams in this situation have covered 55.8% of the time (n=113).
ATS data is informational only. Past cover rates do not guarantee future results.
Coaching Matchup
Bowling Green
Scot Loeffler #1
4–16 (20%)
· Yr 3 at school
OC
Terry Malone
Yr 1
#1
DC
Eric Lewis
Yr 1
#1
Buffalo
Maurice Linguist #1
1–2 (33%)
· Yr 1 at school
OC
Shane Montgomery
Yr 1
#1
DC
Joe Cauthen
Yr 1
#1
About these metrics
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games. ✓
Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: Momentum Control is a great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: Game Control is another great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself ✓
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games. ✓
Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: Momentum Control is a great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: Game Control is another great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself ✓