Ohio at Bowling Green Week 13 College Football Matchup Ohio at Bowling Green Matchup - Week 13
Fri, Nov 26 2021 · Week 13 · 🏟 Doyt Perry Stadium Bowling Green, OH · Turf · 24,000 cap
Ohio✈ 163 miSame TZ
Away
10 21
Final
📊 Punt & Rally Projection
Ohio
24
BGSU +6
Bowling Green
26
P&R Line Bowling Green -1.5
P&R Total O/U 50
Confidence 86 High
Vegas Ohio -6 · O/U 48.0
Matchup Prediction
Ohio has the edge in this matchup
Both Momentum Control (CSS) and Game Control metrics favor Ohio entering this game.
Momentum Control
61.3%
Ohio wins
Lean
Game Control
58.3%
Ohio wins
Lean
Vegas Spread
Ohio -6
O/U 48.0
teamrankings
Advanced Stats
PPA + Success Rate agree → Ohio · 73.9% ATS historically
↓ See full breakdown
Ohio 2021 Schedule
Ohio's 2021 Schedule
DateMatchupSpreadTotalResultO/UCover
Sat 9/4Ohio vs Syracuse-2.0L9–2955.5L9–29UN
Sat 9/11Ohio vs Duquesne-28.5L26–2849.0L26–28ON
Thu 9/16Ohio at Louisiana+18.5L14–4956.5L14–49ON
Sat 9/25Ohio at Northwestern+13.5L6–3547.5L6–35UN
Sat 10/2Ohio at Akron-10.0W34–1755.0W34–17UY
Sat 10/9Ohio vs Central Michigan+5.0L27–3058.0L27–30UY
Sat 10/16Ohio at Buffalo+7.5L26–2754.5L26–27UY
Sat 10/23Ohio vs Kent State+5.0L27–3468.5L27–34UN
— Bye Week —
Tue 11/2Ohio vs Miami (OH)+7.0W35–3354.5W35–33OY
Tue 11/9Ohio at Eastern Michigan+6.0W34–2661.5W34–26UY
Tue 11/16Ohio vs Toledo+7.5L23–3557.5L23–35ON
Fri 11/26Ohio at Bowling Green-6.0L10–2148.0L10–21UN
Bowling Green 2021 Schedule
Bowling Green's 2021 Schedule
DateMatchupSpreadTotalResultO/UCover
Thu 9/2Bowling Green at Tennessee+37.0L6–3860.5L6–38UY
Sat 9/11Bowling Green vs South Alabama+14.5L19–2248.0L19–22UY
Sat 9/18Bowling Green vs Murray State+2.5W27–1044.0W27–10UY
Sat 9/25Bowling Green at Minnesota+30.5W14–1052.5W14–10UY
Sat 10/2Bowling Green at Kent State+16.5L20–2756.0L20–27UY
Sat 10/9Bowling Green vs Akron-14.0L20–3546.0L20–35ON
Sat 10/16Bowling Green at Northern Illinois+9.0L26–3444.5L26–34OY
Sat 10/23Bowling Green vs Eastern Michigan+4.5L24–5549.5L24–55ON
Sat 10/30Bowling Green at Buffalo+13.5W56–4451.5W56–44OY
— Bye Week —
Wed 11/10Bowling Green vs Toledo+10.5L17–4950.0L17–49ON
Tue 11/16Bowling Green at Miami (OH)+17.0L7–3452.0L7–34UN
Fri 11/26Bowling Green vs Ohio+6.0W21–1048.0W21–10UY
Advanced Stats
Advanced Analytics Matchup
Matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense) · 2021 season
Ohio PPA Edge
Agreement Signals — When All Metrics Agree
Elite · 83.1% ATS
PPA + PPO + SR + Havoc
Split
Metrics disagree
Elite · 82.4% ATS
PPA + PPO + Havoc
Split
Metrics disagree
Elite · 73.9% ATS
PPA + Success Rate
Both Agree
→ Ohio
Individual Factors — Ranked by Predictive Strength
PPA Overall
Points added per play · Elite predictor
Ohio
+0.391
Bowling Green
+0.349
Ohio Edge
PPA Passing
Pass efficiency edge · Strong predictor
Ohio
+0.337
Bowling Green
+0.473
Bowling Green Edge
Havoc Total
Def. disruption rate · Strong predictor
Ohio
0.122
Bowling Green
0.167
TFLs, sacks, PBUs, forced fumbles — higher is better
Bowling Green Edge
Points Per Opp
Drive-finishing edge · Strong predictor
Ohio
+8.050
Bowling Green
+7.614
Ohio Edge
Success Rate
Play consistency edge · Solid predictor
Ohio
+0.877
Bowling Green
+0.832
Ohio Edge
Field Position
Avg start (lower=better) · Solid predictor
Ohio
71.0
Bowling Green
69.6
Avg yards from own endzone to average start — lower is better · longer bar = better field position
Bowling Green Edge
Advanced stats sourced from CFBD · 2021 season · Edges are matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense)
Power Ratings
Team Power Ratings
Overall · Offense · Defense ratings · Updated as season progresses
Bowling Green Rated Higher
Overall Power Rating
Ohio
-10.3
Bowling Green
-9.7
Offense Rating
Ohio
7.5
Bowling Green
10.9
Defense Rating (lower = better defense)
Ohio
17.7
Bowling Green
20.7
Power ratings updated throughout the season as results accumulate
Momentum Control (CSS)
Consecutive Scoring Sequences Who builds scoring momentum? Ohio Edge
Avg sequences created per game
Ohio #76
0.90
Bowling Green #86
0.46
Avg sequences allowed per game (lower is better)
Ohio #101
1.50
Bowling Green #86
1.46
Ohio +0.45
CSS Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 61.3% of games historically
Based on 11 games this season
Game Control (GC)
Win Probability Dominance Who controls games start to finish? Ohio Edge
Avg GC score per game (offense)
Ohio #1
36.3
Bowling Green #1
26.5
Avg GC score allowed per game (lower is better)
Ohio #93
52.3
Bowling Green #105
60.9
Ohio +9.8
GC Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 58.3% of games historically
Based on 11 games this season
Actual Result
CSS Battle
Tie
1 — 1 sequences
✗ Predicted incorrectly
GC Battle
Bowling Green
38.8 — 33.2 GC score
✗ Predicted incorrectly
Game Result
Bowling Green won by 11
✗ Model missed it
Spread Context
ATS Historical Context
Based on 2021–2025 backtest · FBS vs FBS · Regular season

Both metrics agree on Ohio. Teams with this edge profile have covered 50.3% historically — essentially a coin flip against the spread.

ATS data is informational only. Past cover rates do not guarantee future results.

Coaching Matchup
Ohio
Tim Albin #1
0–3 (0%) · Yr 1 at school
OC Scott Ishpording Yr 1 #1
DC Pete Germano Yr 1 #1
Staff Rating
0.00 #1
Bowling Green
Scot Loeffler #1
4–16 (20%) · Yr 3 at school
OC Terry Malone Yr 1 #1
DC Eric Lewis Yr 1 #1
Staff Rating
0.00 #1
About these metrics
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games.

Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: Momentum Control is a great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set.

Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: Game Control is another great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set.

Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself