Sat, Sep 25 2021
·
Week 4
·
🏟 Huntington Bank Stadium
Minneapolis, MN
·
Turf
·
50,805 cap
Bowling Green✈ 543 mi-1 hr TZ
Matchup Prediction
Minnesota
has the edge in this matchup
Both Momentum Control (CSS) and Game Control metrics favor
Minnesota entering this game.
Momentum Control
71.6%
Minnesota wins
Solid
Game Control
76%
Minnesota wins
Strong
Vegas Spread
Minnesota -30.5
O/U 52.5
teamrankings
Advanced Stats
All 4 factors agree → Minnesota
· 83.1% ATS historically when all four align
↓ See full breakdown
Bowling Green 2021 Schedule
Bowling Green's 2021 Schedule
| Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 9/2 | Bowling Green at Tennessee | +37.0L6–38 | 60.5 | L6–38 | U | Y |
| Sat 9/11 | Bowling Green vs South Alabama | +14.5L19–22 | 48.0 | L19–22 | U | Y |
| Sat 9/18 | Bowling Green vs Murray State | +2.5W27–10 | 44.0 | W27–10 | U | Y |
| Sat 9/25 | Bowling Green at Minnesota | +30.5W14–10 | 52.5 | W14–10 | U | Y |
| Sat 10/2 | Bowling Green at Kent State | +16.5L20–27 | 56.0 | L20–27 | U | Y |
| Sat 10/9 | Bowling Green vs Akron | -14.0L20–35 | 46.0 | L20–35 | O | N |
| Sat 10/16 | Bowling Green at Northern Illinois | +9.0L26–34 | 44.5 | L26–34 | O | Y |
| Sat 10/23 | Bowling Green vs Eastern Michigan | +4.5L24–55 | 49.5 | L24–55 | O | N |
| Sat 10/30 | Bowling Green at Buffalo | +13.5W56–44 | 51.5 | W56–44 | O | Y |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Wed 11/10 | Bowling Green vs Toledo | +10.5L17–49 | 50.0 | L17–49 | O | N |
| Tue 11/16 | Bowling Green at Miami (OH) | +17.0L7–34 | 52.0 | L7–34 | U | N |
| Fri 11/26 | Bowling Green vs Ohio | +6.0W21–10 | 48.0 | W21–10 | U | Y |
Minnesota 2021 Schedule
Minnesota's 2021 Schedule
| Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 9/2 | Minnesota vs Ohio State | +14.0L31–45 | 62.0 | L31–45 | O | Y |
| Sat 9/11 | Minnesota vs Miami (OH) | -18.5W31–26 | 55.0 | W31–26 | O | N |
| Sat 9/18 | Minnesota at Colorado | +2.5W30–0 | 49.0 | W30–0 | U | Y |
| Sat 9/25 | Minnesota vs Bowling Green | -30.5L10–14 | 52.5 | L10–14 | U | N |
| Sat 10/2 | Minnesota at Purdue | +2.0W20–13 | 46.0 | W20–13 | U | Y |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Sat 10/16 | Minnesota vs Nebraska | +4.5W30–23 | 48.5 | W30–23 | O | Y |
| Sat 10/23 | Minnesota vs Maryland | -4.0W34–16 | 53.0 | W34–16 | U | Y |
| Sat 10/30 | Minnesota at Northwestern | -7.5W41–14 | 43.5 | W41–14 | O | Y |
| Sat 11/6 | Minnesota vs Illinois | -14.5L6–14 | 44.5 | L6–14 | U | N |
| Sat 11/13 | Minnesota at Iowa | +4.0L22–27 | 37.5 | L22–27 | O | N |
| Sat 11/20 | Minnesota at Indiana | -7.5W35–14 | 43.0 | W35–14 | O | Y |
| Sat 11/27 | Minnesota vs Wisconsin | +7.0W23–13 | 39.0 | W23–13 | U | Y |
| Tue 12/28 | Minnesota vs West Virginia | -5.0W18–6 | 44.5 | W18–6 | U | Y |
Advanced Stats
Advanced Analytics Matchup
Matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense) ·
2021 season
Agreement Signals — When All Metrics Agree
Elite · 83.1% ATS
PPA + PPO + SR + Havoc
All 4 Agree
→ Minnesota
Elite · 82.4% ATS
PPA + PPO + Havoc
3 Agree
→ Minnesota
Elite · 73.9% ATS
PPA + Success Rate
Both Agree
→ Minnesota
Individual Factors — Ranked by Predictive Strength
PPA Overall
Points added per play · Elite predictor
PPA Passing
Pass efficiency edge · Strong predictor
Havoc Total
Def. disruption rate · Strong predictor
TFLs, sacks, PBUs, forced fumbles — higher is better
Points Per Opp
Drive-finishing edge · Strong predictor
Success Rate
Play consistency edge · Solid predictor
Field Position
Avg start (lower=better) · Solid predictor
Avg yards from own endzone to average start — lower is better · longer bar = better field position
Advanced stats sourced from CFBD · 2021 season ·
Edges are matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense)
Power Ratings
Team Power Ratings
Overall · Offense · Defense ratings · Updated as season progresses
Power ratings updated throughout the season as results accumulate
Momentum Control (CSS)
Consecutive Scoring Sequences
Who builds scoring momentum?
Minnesota Edge
Minnesota +1.00
CSS Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 71.6% of games historically
Based on 3 games this season
Game Control (GC)
Win Probability Dominance
Who controls games start to finish?
Minnesota Edge
Minnesota +23.4
GC Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 76% of games historically
Based on 3 games this season
Spread Context
ATS Historical Context
Based on 2021–2025 backtest · FBS vs FBS · Regular season
Both metrics agree on Minnesota with a large edge. Historically, dominant teams like this are fully priced into the spread — the agreed-upon team covers just 50.2% of the time. The metrics predict game control better than they beat the number.
ATS data is informational only. Past cover rates do not guarantee future results.
Coaching Matchup
Bowling Green
Scot Loeffler #1
4–16 (20%)
· Yr 3 at school
OC
Terry Malone
Yr 1
#1
DC
Eric Lewis
Yr 1
#1
Minnesota
P. J. Fleck #1
28–20 (58%)
· Yr 5 at school
OC
Mike Sanford Jr.
Yr 1
#1
DC
Joe Rossi
Yr 1
#1
About these metrics
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games. ✓
Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: Momentum Control is a great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: Game Control is another great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself ✓
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games. ✓
Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: Momentum Control is a great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: Game Control is another great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself ✓