Sat, Nov 15 2025
·
Week 12
·
🏟 Bulldog Stadium
Fresno, CA
·
Turf
·
41,031 cap
Wyoming✈ 821 mi-1 hr TZ
Matchup Prediction
Fresno State
has the edge in this matchup
Both Momentum Control (CSS) and Game Control metrics favor
Fresno State entering this game.
Momentum Control
58.4%
Fresno State wins
Lean
Game Control
58.6%
Fresno State wins
Lean
Vegas Spread
Fresno State -3
O/U 40.5
DraftKings
Advanced Stats
Advanced factors are split · No strong agreement signal
↓ See full breakdown
Wyoming 2025 Schedule
Wyoming's 2025 Schedule
| Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 8/28 | Wyoming at Akron | -8.5W10–0 | 49.5 | W10–0 | U | Y |
| Sat 9/6 | Wyoming vs Northern Iowa | -14.0W31–7 | 47.5 | W31–7 | U | Y |
| Sat 9/13 | Wyoming vs Utah | +24.5L6–31 | 47.5 | L6–31 | U | N |
| Sat 9/20 | Wyoming at Colorado | +12.5L20–37 | 45.5 | L20–37 | O | N |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Sat 10/4 | Wyoming vs UNLV | +4.5L17–31 | 50.5 | L17–31 | U | N |
| Sat 10/11 | Wyoming vs San José State | +1.5W35–28 | 50.5 | W35–28 | O | Y |
| Sat 10/18 | Wyoming at Air Force | +4.0L21–24 | 56.5 | L21–24 | U | Y |
| Sat 10/25 | Wyoming vs Colorado State | -5.5W28–0 | 46.5 | W28–0 | U | Y |
| Sat 11/1 | Wyoming at San Diego State | +10.0L7–24 | 42.5 | L7–24 | U | N |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Sat 11/15 | Wyoming at Fresno State | +3.0L3–24 | 40.5 | L3–24 | U | N |
| Sat 11/22 | Wyoming vs Nevada | -6.0L7–13 | 39.5 | L7–13 | U | N |
| Sat 11/29 | Wyoming at Hawai'i | +8.5L7–27 | 45.0 | L7–27 | U | N |
Fresno State 2025 Schedule
Fresno State's 2025 Schedule
| Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 8/23 | Fresno State at Kansas | +14.0L7–31 | 51.5 | L7–31 | U | N |
| Sat 8/30 | Fresno State vs Georgia Southern | -2.5W42–14 | 54.5 | W42–14 | O | Y |
| Sat 9/6 | Fresno State at Oregon State | +1.0W36–27 | 45.5 | W36–27 | O | Y |
| Sat 9/13 | Fresno State vs Southern | -37.5W56–7 | 51.5 | W56–7 | O | Y |
| Sat 9/20 | Fresno State at Hawai'i | -2.5W23–21 | 47.5 | W23–21 | U | N |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Sat 10/4 | Fresno State vs Nevada | -12.5W20–17 | 45.5 | W20–17 | U | N |
| Fri 10/10 | Fresno State at Colorado State | -5.5L21–49 | 47.5 | L21–49 | O | N |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Sat 10/25 | Fresno State vs San Diego State | +3.0L0–23 | 46.5 | L0–23 | U | N |
| Sat 11/1 | Fresno State at Boise State | +17.5W30–7 | 47.5 | W30–7 | U | Y |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Sat 11/15 | Fresno State vs Wyoming | -3.0W24–3 | 40.5 | W24–3 | U | Y |
| Sat 11/22 | Fresno State vs Utah State | -1.5L17–28 | 50.5 | L17–28 | U | N |
| Sat 11/29 | Fresno State at San José State | -3.5W41–14 | 46.0 | W41–14 | O | Y |
| Sat 12/27 | Fresno State vs Miami (OH) | -5.0W18–3 | 41.0 | W18–3 | U | Y |
Advanced Stats
Advanced Analytics Matchup
Matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense) ·
2025 season
Agreement Signals — When All Metrics Agree
Elite · 83.1% ATS
PPA + PPO + SR + Havoc
Split
Metrics disagree
Elite · 82.4% ATS
PPA + PPO + Havoc
Split
Metrics disagree
Elite · 73.9% ATS
PPA + Success Rate
Split
Metrics disagree
Individual Factors — Ranked by Predictive Strength
PPA Overall
Points added per play · Elite predictor
PPA Passing
Pass efficiency edge · Strong predictor
Havoc Total
Def. disruption rate · Strong predictor
TFLs, sacks, PBUs, forced fumbles — higher is better
Points Per Opp
Drive-finishing edge · Strong predictor
Success Rate
Play consistency edge · Solid predictor
Field Position
Avg start (lower=better) · Solid predictor
Avg yards from own endzone to average start — lower is better · longer bar = better field position
Advanced stats sourced from CFBD · 2025 season ·
Edges are matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense)
Power Ratings
Team Power Ratings
Overall · Offense · Defense ratings · Updated as season progresses
Power ratings updated throughout the season as results accumulate
Momentum Control (CSS)
Consecutive Scoring Sequences
Who builds scoring momentum?
Fresno State Edge
Fresno State +0.75
CSS Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 58.4% of games historically
Based on 8 games this season
Game Control (GC)
Win Probability Dominance
Who controls games start to finish?
Fresno State Edge
Fresno State +9.8
GC Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 58.6% of games historically
Based on 9 games this season
Spread Context
ATS Historical Context
Based on 2021–2025 backtest · FBS vs FBS · Regular season
Both metrics agree on Fresno State. Teams with this edge profile have covered 50.3% historically — essentially a coin flip against the spread.
ATS data is informational only. Past cover rates do not guarantee future results.
Coaching Matchup
Wyoming
Jay Sawvel #1
3–9 (25%)
· Yr 2 at school
OC
Jay Johnson
Yr 2
#1
DC
Aaron Bohl
Yr 2
#1
Fresno State
Matt Entz #1
0–0 (0%)
· Yr 1 at school
OC
Josh Davis
Yr 1
#1
DC
Nick Benedetto
Yr 1
#1
About these metrics
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games. ✓
Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: CSS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: GS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself ✓
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games. ✓
Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: CSS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: GS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself ✓