Florida Atlantic at Florida International Week 3 College Football Matchup Florida Atlantic at Florida International Matchup - Week 3
Sat, Sep 13 2025 · Week 3 · 🏟 Pitbull Stadium Miami, FL · Turf · 23,500 cap
28 38
Final
📊 Punt & Rally Projection
Florida Atlantic
29
Florida International
31
P&R Line Florida International -2
P&R Total O/U 59.5
Confidence 90 High
Vegas Florida International -2.0 · O/U 56.5
Matchup Prediction
Toss-up — no clear edge
Neither metric shows a meaningful pre-game edge in this matchup.
Momentum Control
58.4%
Lean
Game Control
49.4%
Florida Atlantic wins
Toss-up
Vegas Spread
Florida International -2.0
O/U 56.5
Bovada
Advanced Stats
All 4 factors agree → Florida International · 83.1% ATS historically when all four align
↓ See full breakdown
Florida Atlantic 2025 Schedule
Florida Atlantic's 2025 Schedule
DateMatchupSpreadTotalResultO/UCover
Sat 8/30Florida Atlantic at Maryland+16.5L7–3957.5L7–39UN
Sat 9/6Florida Atlantic vs Florida A&M-21.0W56–1451.0W56–14OY
Sat 9/13Florida Atlantic at Florida International+2.0L28–3856.5L28–38ON
— Bye Week —
Sat 9/27Florida Atlantic vs Memphis+14.0L26–5562.5L26–55ON
Sat 10/4Florida Atlantic at Rice+4.5W27–2154.5W27–21UY
Sat 10/11Florida Atlantic vs UAB-4.5W53–3366.5W53–33OY
Sat 10/18Florida Atlantic at South Florida+20.5L13–4872.5L13–48UN
Sat 10/25Florida Atlantic at Navy+14.5L32–4263.5L32–42OY
— Bye Week —
Sat 11/8Florida Atlantic vs Tulsa-4.5W40–2160.5W40–21OY
Sat 11/15Florida Atlantic at Tulane+16.5L24–3560.5L24–35UY
Sat 11/22Florida Atlantic vs UConn+6.0L45–4864.0L45–48OY
Sat 11/29Florida Atlantic vs East Carolina+6.5L3–4266.5L3–42UN
Florida International 2025 Schedule
Advanced Stats
Advanced Analytics Matchup
Matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense) · 2025 season
Florida International PPA Edge
Agreement Signals — When All Metrics Agree
Elite · 83.1% ATS
PPA + PPO + SR + Havoc
All 4 Agree
→ Florida International
Elite · 82.4% ATS
PPA + PPO + Havoc
3 Agree
→ Florida International
Elite · 73.9% ATS
PPA + Success Rate
Both Agree
→ Florida International
Individual Factors — Ranked by Predictive Strength
PPA Overall
Points added per play · Elite predictor
Florida Atlantic #43
+0.371
Florida International #81
+0.419
Florida International Edge
PPA Passing
Pass efficiency edge · Strong predictor
Florida Atlantic #42
+0.596
Florida International #89
+0.516
Florida Atlantic Edge
Havoc Total
Def. disruption rate · Strong predictor
Florida Atlantic #106
0.139
Florida International #54
0.164
TFLs, sacks, PBUs, forced fumbles — higher is better
Florida International Edge
Points Per Opp
Drive-finishing edge · Strong predictor
Florida Atlantic #93
+7.149
Florida International #35
+8.697
Florida International Edge
Success Rate
Play consistency edge · Solid predictor
Florida Atlantic #80
+0.843
Florida International #93
+0.862
Florida International Edge
Field Position
Avg start (lower=better) · Solid predictor
Florida Atlantic #35
69.5
Florida International #46
69.9
Avg yards from own endzone to average start — lower is better · longer bar = better field position
Florida Atlantic Edge
Advanced stats sourced from CFBD · 2025 season · Edges are matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense)
Power Ratings
Team Power Ratings
Overall · Offense · Defense ratings · Updated as season progresses
Florida International Rated Higher
Overall Power Rating
Florida Atlantic
-6.5
Florida International
-4.1
Offense Rating
Florida Atlantic
11.5
Florida International
11.7
Defense Rating (lower = better defense)
Florida Atlantic
18.0
Florida International
15.8
Power ratings updated throughout the season as results accumulate
Momentum Control (CSS)
Consecutive Scoring Sequences Who builds scoring momentum?
Avg sequences created per game
Florida Atlantic #101
0.00
Florida International #77
0.00
Avg sequences allowed per game (lower is better)
Florida Atlantic #127
4.00
Florida International #107
2.00
Florida Atlantic +0.00
CSS Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 58.4% of games historically
Based on 1 game this season
Game Control (GC)
Win Probability Dominance Who controls games start to finish? Florida Atlantic Edge
Avg GC score per game (offense)
Florida Atlantic #1
50.6
Florida International #1
46.7
Avg GC score allowed per game (lower is better)
Florida Atlantic #112
40.4
Florida International #94
48.6
Florida Atlantic +3.9
GC Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 49.4% of games historically
Based on 2 games this season
Actual Result
CSS Battle
Florida International
2 — 0 sequences
GC Battle
Florida International
64.2 — 11.9 GC score
✗ Predicted incorrectly
Game Result
Florida International won by 10
Spread Context
ATS Historical Context
Based on 2021–2025 backtest · FBS vs FBS · Regular season

CSS and GC disagree on this matchup. When the metrics split, historical cover rates are essentially random — treat this as a coin flip against the spread.

ATS data is informational only. Past cover rates do not guarantee future results.

Coaching Matchup
Florida Atlantic
Zach Kittley #1
0–0 (0%) · Yr 1 at school
OC Vacant Yr 1 #1
DC Brett Dewhurst Yr 1 #1
Staff Rating
0.00 #1
Florida International
Willie Simmons #1
0–0 (0%) · Yr 1 at school
OC Nick Coleman Yr 1 #1
DC Jovan Dewitt Yr 3 #1
Staff Rating
0.00 #1
About these metrics
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games.

Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: Momentum Control is a great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set.

Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: Game Control is another great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set.

Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself