Matchup Prediction
Toss-up — no clear edge
Neither metric shows a meaningful pre-game edge in this matchup.
Momentum Control
58.4%
—
Lean
Game Control
50.6%
—
Toss-up
Vegas Spread
Troy -7.5
O/U 44.5
Bovada
Advanced Stats
All 4 factors agree → Troy
· 83.1% ATS historically when all four align
↓ See full breakdown
Nevada 2024 Schedule
Nevada's 2024 Schedule
| Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 8/24 | Nevada vs SMU | +28.0L24–29 | 55.5 | L24–29 | U | Y |
| Sat 8/31 | Nevada at Troy | +7.5W28–26 | 44.5 | W28–26 | O | Y |
| Sat 9/7 | Nevada vs Georgia Southern | -1.5L17–20 | 56.5 | L17–20 | U | N |
| Sat 9/14 | Nevada at Minnesota | +17.5L0–27 | 44.5 | L0–27 | U | N |
| Sat 9/21 | Nevada vs Eastern Washington | -13.5W49–16 | 54.5 | W49–16 | O | Y |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Sat 10/5 | Nevada at San José State | +7.0L31–35 | 51.5 | L31–35 | O | Y |
| Sat 10/12 | Nevada vs Oregon State | +3.0W42–37 | 47.0 | W42–37 | O | Y |
| Fri 10/18 | Nevada vs Fresno State | +3.0L21–24 | 50.0 | L21–24 | U | Y |
| Sat 10/26 | Nevada at Hawai'i | +2.5L13–34 | 42.0 | L13–34 | O | N |
| Sat 11/2 | Nevada vs Colorado State | +2.0L21–38 | 45.5 | L21–38 | O | N |
| Sat 11/9 | Nevada at Boise State | +23.5L21–28 | 60.5 | L21–28 | U | Y |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Sat 11/23 | Nevada vs Air Force | -3.0L19–22 | 44.5 | L19–22 | U | N |
| Sat 11/30 | Nevada at UNLV | +17.5L14–38 | 54.5 | L14–38 | U | N |
Troy 2024 Schedule
Troy's 2024 Schedule
| Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 8/31 | Troy vs Nevada | -7.5L26–28 | 44.5 | L26–28 | O | N |
| Sat 9/7 | Troy at Memphis | +18.5L17–38 | 57.5 | L17–38 | U | N |
| Sat 9/14 | Troy at Iowa | +23.5L21–38 | 39.5 | L21–38 | O | Y |
| Sat 9/21 | Troy vs Florida A&M | -21.5W34–12 | 48.5 | W34–12 | U | Y |
| Sat 9/28 | Troy vs UL Monroe | -6.0L9–13 | 46.0 | L9–13 | U | N |
| Thu 10/3 | Troy vs Texas State | +14.5L17–38 | 56.0 | L17–38 | U | N |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Tue 10/15 | Troy at South Alabama | +10.0L9–25 | 53.0 | L9–25 | U | N |
| Sat 10/26 | Troy at Arkansas State | +8.5L31–34 | 50.0 | L31–34 | O | Y |
| Sat 11/2 | Troy vs Coastal Carolina | +4.0W38–24 | 52.0 | W38–24 | O | Y |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Sat 11/16 | Troy at Georgia Southern | +7.0W28–20 | 54.0 | W28–20 | U | Y |
| Sat 11/23 | Troy at Louisiana | +7.5L30–51 | 51.5 | L30–51 | O | N |
| Sat 11/30 | Troy vs Southern Miss | -17.5W52–20 | 48.5 | W52–20 | O | Y |
Advanced Stats
Advanced Analytics Matchup
Matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense) ·
2024 season
Agreement Signals — When All Metrics Agree
Elite · 83.1% ATS
PPA + PPO + SR + Havoc
All 4 Agree
→ Troy
Elite · 82.4% ATS
PPA + PPO + Havoc
3 Agree
→ Troy
Elite · 73.9% ATS
PPA + Success Rate
Both Agree
→ Troy
Individual Factors — Ranked by Predictive Strength
PPA Overall
Points added per play · Elite predictor
PPA Passing
Pass efficiency edge · Strong predictor
Havoc Total
Def. disruption rate · Strong predictor
TFLs, sacks, PBUs, forced fumbles — higher is better
Points Per Opp
Drive-finishing edge · Strong predictor
Success Rate
Play consistency edge · Solid predictor
Field Position
Avg start (lower=better) · Solid predictor
Avg yards from own endzone to average start — lower is better · longer bar = better field position
Advanced stats sourced from CFBD · 2024 season ·
Edges are matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense)
Power Ratings
Team Power Ratings
Overall · Offense · Defense ratings · Updated as season progresses
Power ratings updated throughout the season as results accumulate
Momentum Control (CSS)
Consecutive Scoring Sequences
Who builds scoring momentum?
Nevada Edge
Nevada +0.00
CSS Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 58.4% of games historically
Based on 0 games this season
Game Control (GC)
Win Probability Dominance
Who controls games start to finish?
Nevada Edge
Nevada +0.0
GC Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 50.6% of games historically
Based on 0 games this season
Actual Result
CSS Battle
Nevada
1 — 2 sequences
✗ Predicted incorrectly
GC Battle
Nevada
35.1 — 39.0 GC score
✗ Predicted incorrectly
Game Result
Nevada won by 2
Spread Context
ATS Historical Context
Based on 2021–2025 backtest · FBS vs FBS · Regular season
Both metrics agree on Troy, but the GC edge is small. When metrics agree but GC is near-neutral, the agreed-upon team has covered only 46.7% of the time historically (n=224) — potentially a fade signal.
ATS data is informational only. Past cover rates do not guarantee future results.
Coaching Matchup
Nevada
Jeff Choate #1
0–0 (0%)
· Yr 1 at school
OC
Matt Lubick
Yr 1
#1
DC
Kane Ioane
Yr 1
#1
Troy
Gerad Parker #1
0–0 (0%)
· Yr 1 at school
OC
Sean Reagan
Yr 1
#1
DC
Nathan Burton
Yr 1
#1
About these metrics
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games. ✓
Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: Momentum Control is a great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: Game Control is another great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself ✓
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games. ✓
Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: Momentum Control is a great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: Game Control is another great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself ✓