Sat, Aug 31 2024
·
Week 1
·
🏟 Memorial Stadium
Bloomington, IN
·
Turf
·
52,959 cap
Florida International✈ 994 miSame TZ
Matchup Prediction
Toss-up — no clear edge
Neither metric shows a meaningful pre-game edge in this matchup.
Momentum Control
58.4%
—
Lean
Game Control
50.6%
—
Toss-up
Vegas Spread
Indiana -20.5
O/U 50.5
DraftKings
Advanced Stats
All 4 factors agree → Indiana
· 83.1% ATS historically when all four align
↓ See full breakdown
Florida International 2024 Schedule
Florida International's 2024 Schedule
| Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 8/31 | Florida International at Indiana | +20.5L7–31 | 50.5 | L7–31 | U | N |
| Sat 9/7 | Florida International vs Central Michigan | +3.5W52–16 | 51.5 | W52–16 | O | Y |
| Sat 9/14 | Florida International at Florida Atlantic | +3.5L20–38 | 44.5 | L20–38 | O | N |
| Sat 9/21 | Florida International vs Monmouth | -12.5L42–45 | 59.5 | L42–45 | O | N |
| Sat 9/28 | Florida International vs Louisiana Tech | +2.0W17–10 | 49.0 | W17–10 | U | Y |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Tue 10/8 | Florida International at Liberty | +15.5L24–31 | 56.0 | L24–31 | U | Y |
| Wed 10/16 | Florida International at UTEP | -7.0L21–30 | 47.0 | L21–30 | O | N |
| Tue 10/22 | Florida International vs Sam Houston | +5.0L7–10 | 47.0 | L7–10 | U | Y |
| Tue 10/29 | Florida International vs New Mexico State | -7.0W34–13 | 43.5 | W34–13 | O | Y |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Sat 11/16 | Florida International at Jacksonville State | +12.5L31–34 | 58.5 | L31–34 | O | Y |
| Sat 11/23 | Florida International at Kennesaw State | -9.0L26–27 | 42.5 | L26–27 | O | N |
| Sat 11/30 | Florida International vs Middle Tennessee | -9.5W35–24 | 50.5 | W35–24 | O | Y |
Indiana 2024 Schedule
Indiana's 2024 Schedule
| Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 8/31 | Indiana vs Florida International | -20.5W31–7 | 50.5 | W31–7 | U | Y |
| Fri 9/6 | Indiana vs Western Illinois | -44.5W77–3 | 52.5 | W77–3 | O | Y |
| Sat 9/14 | Indiana at UCLA | -3.5W42–13 | 46.5 | W42–13 | O | Y |
| Sat 9/21 | Indiana vs Charlotte | -28.5W52–14 | 50.0 | W52–14 | O | Y |
| Sat 9/28 | Indiana vs Maryland | -7.5W42–28 | 50.0 | W42–28 | O | Y |
| Sat 10/5 | Indiana vs Northwestern | -12.5W41–24 | 40.5 | W41–24 | O | Y |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Sat 10/19 | Indiana vs Nebraska | -6.5W56–7 | 48.0 | W56–7 | O | Y |
| Sat 10/26 | Indiana vs Washington | -5.5W31–17 | 54.0 | W31–17 | U | Y |
| Sat 11/2 | Indiana at Michigan State | -7.5W47–10 | 53.5 | W47–10 | O | Y |
| Sat 11/9 | Indiana vs Michigan | -14.5W20–15 | 47.5 | W20–15 | U | N |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Sat 11/23 | Indiana at Ohio State | +10.5L15–38 | 52.5 | L15–38 | O | N |
| Sat 11/30 | Indiana vs Purdue | -28.5W66–0 | 56.5 | W66–0 | O | Y |
| Fri 12/20 | Indiana at Notre Dame | +7.0L17–27 | 50.0 | L17–27 | U | N |
Advanced Stats
Advanced Analytics Matchup
Matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense) ·
2024 season
Agreement Signals — When All Metrics Agree
Elite · 83.1% ATS
PPA + PPO + SR + Havoc
All 4 Agree
→ Indiana
Elite · 82.4% ATS
PPA + PPO + Havoc
3 Agree
→ Indiana
Elite · 73.9% ATS
PPA + Success Rate
Both Agree
→ Indiana
Individual Factors — Ranked by Predictive Strength
PPA Overall
Points added per play · Elite predictor
PPA Passing
Pass efficiency edge · Strong predictor
Havoc Total
Def. disruption rate · Strong predictor
TFLs, sacks, PBUs, forced fumbles — higher is better
Points Per Opp
Drive-finishing edge · Strong predictor
Success Rate
Play consistency edge · Solid predictor
Field Position
Avg start (lower=better) · Solid predictor
Avg yards from own endzone to average start — lower is better · longer bar = better field position
Advanced stats sourced from CFBD · 2024 season ·
Edges are matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense)
Power Ratings
Team Power Ratings
Overall · Offense · Defense ratings · Updated as season progresses
Power ratings updated throughout the season as results accumulate
Momentum Control (CSS)
Consecutive Scoring Sequences
Who builds scoring momentum?
Florida International Edge
Florida International +0.00
CSS Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 58.4% of games historically
Based on 0 games this season
Game Control (GC)
Win Probability Dominance
Who controls games start to finish?
Florida International Edge
Florida International +0.0
GC Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 50.6% of games historically
Based on 0 games this season
Actual Result
CSS Battle
Indiana
2 — 0 sequences
✗ Predicted incorrectly
GC Battle
Indiana
87.3 — 5.8 GC score
✗ Predicted incorrectly
Game Result
Indiana won by 24
Spread Context
ATS Historical Context
Based on 2021–2025 backtest · FBS vs FBS · Regular season
Both metrics agree on Indiana, but the GC edge is small. When metrics agree but GC is near-neutral, the agreed-upon team has covered only 46.7% of the time historically (n=224) — potentially a fade signal.
ATS data is informational only. Past cover rates do not guarantee future results.
Coaching Matchup
Florida International
Mike MacIntyre #1
8–16 (33%)
· Yr 3 at school
OC
David Yost
Yr 3
#1
DC
Jovan Dewitt
Yr 3
#1
Indiana
Curt Cignetti #1
0–0 (0%)
· Yr 1 at school
OC
Mike Shanahan
Yr 1
#1
DC
Bryant Haines
Yr 1
#1
About these metrics
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games. ✓
Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: CSS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: GS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself ✓
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games. ✓
Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: CSS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: GS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself ✓