Sat, Sep 21 2024
·
Week 4
·
Neutral Site
·
🏟 Pitbull Stadium
Miami, FL
·
Turf
·
23,500 cap
Monmouth✈ 1,068 miSame TZ
Preseason projection — This game has not yet been played and 2024 in-season data is not yet available.
Edges are based on 2023 full-season performance.
Confidence will increase once in-season games are logged.
Matchup Prediction
Toss-up — no clear edge
Neither metric shows a meaningful pre-game edge in this matchup.
Momentum Control
58.4%
—
Lean
Game Control
76%
Florida International wins
Strong
Vegas Spread
Florida International -12.5
O/U 59.5
ESPN Bet
Monmouth 2024 Schedule
Monmouth's 2024 Schedule
| Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Sat 9/21 | Monmouth vs Florida International | +12.5W45–42 | 59.5 | W45–42 | O | Y |
Florida International 2024 Schedule
Florida International's 2024 Schedule
| Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 8/31 | Florida International at Indiana | +20.5L7–31 | 50.5 | L7–31 | U | N |
| Sat 9/7 | Florida International vs Central Michigan | +3.5W52–16 | 51.5 | W52–16 | O | Y |
| Sat 9/14 | Florida International at Florida Atlantic | +3.5L20–38 | 44.5 | L20–38 | O | N |
| Sat 9/21 | Florida International vs Monmouth | -12.5L42–45 | 59.5 | L42–45 | O | N |
| Sat 9/28 | Florida International vs Louisiana Tech | +2.0W17–10 | 49.0 | W17–10 | U | Y |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Tue 10/8 | Florida International at Liberty | +15.5L24–31 | 56.0 | L24–31 | U | Y |
| Wed 10/16 | Florida International at UTEP | -7.0L21–30 | 47.0 | L21–30 | O | N |
| Tue 10/22 | Florida International vs Sam Houston | +5.0L7–10 | 47.0 | L7–10 | U | Y |
| Tue 10/29 | Florida International vs New Mexico State | -7.0W34–13 | 43.5 | W34–13 | O | Y |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Sat 11/16 | Florida International at Jacksonville State | +12.5L31–34 | 58.5 | L31–34 | O | Y |
| Sat 11/23 | Florida International at Kennesaw State | -9.0L26–27 | 42.5 | L26–27 | O | N |
| Sat 11/30 | Florida International vs Middle Tennessee | -9.5W35–24 | 50.5 | W35–24 | O | Y |
Momentum Control (CSS)
Consecutive Scoring Sequences
Who builds scoring momentum?
Monmouth Edge
Monmouth +0.00
CSS Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 58.4% of games historically
Based on 2023 full season · preseason estimate
Game Control (GC)
Win Probability Dominance
Who controls games start to finish?
Florida International Edge
Florida International +21.7
GC Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 76% of games historically
Based on 2023 full season · preseason estimate
About these metrics
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games. ✓
Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: CSS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: GS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself ✓
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games. ✓
Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: CSS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: GS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself ✓