Maryland at Indiana Week 5 College Football Matchup Maryland at Indiana Matchup - Week 5
Sat, Sep 28 2024 · Week 5 · 🏟 Memorial Stadium Bloomington, IN · Turf · 52,959 cap
Maryland✈ 513 miSame TZ
Away
28 42
Final
Home
📊 Punt & Rally Projection
Maryland
13
IND -7.5
Indiana
40
P&R Line Indiana -26.5
P&R Total O/U 53
Confidence 90 High
Vegas Indiana -7.5 · O/U 50.0
Matchup Prediction
Toss-up — no clear edge
Neither metric shows a meaningful pre-game edge in this matchup.
Momentum Control
58.4%
Lean
Game Control
76%
Indiana wins
Strong
Vegas Spread
Indiana -7.5
O/U 50.0
DraftKings
Advanced Stats
All 4 factors agree → Indiana · 83.1% ATS historically when all four align
↓ See full breakdown
🏠 Indiana 2nd straight Home Game
Maryland 2024 Schedule
Maryland's 2024 Schedule
DateMatchupSpreadTotalResultO/UCover
Sat 8/31Maryland vs UConn-19.0W50–745.5W50–7OY
Sat 9/7Maryland vs Michigan State-7.5L24–2744.5L24–27ON
Sat 9/14Maryland at Virginia+2.5W27–1355.5W27–13UY
Sat 9/21Maryland vs Villanova-22.5W38–2046.5W38–20ON
Sat 9/28Maryland at Indiana+7.5L28–4250.0L28–42ON
— Bye Week —
Fri 10/11Maryland vs Northwestern-11.0L10–3745.0L10–37ON
Sat 10/19Maryland vs USC+6.5W29–2856.5W29–28OY
Sat 10/26Maryland at Minnesota+6.0L23–4845.0L23–48ON
— Bye Week —
Sat 11/9Maryland at Oregon+24.0L18–3958.0L18–39UY
Sat 11/16Maryland vs Rutgers-4.5L17–3154.5L17–31UN
Sat 11/23Maryland vs Iowa+4.0L13–2940.5L13–29ON
Sat 11/30Maryland at Penn State+26.5L7–4450.5L7–44ON
Indiana 2024 Schedule
Indiana's 2024 Schedule
DateMatchupSpreadTotalResultO/UCover
Sat 8/31Indiana vs Florida International-20.5W31–750.5W31–7UY
Fri 9/6Indiana vs Western Illinois-44.5W77–352.5W77–3OY
Sat 9/14Indiana at UCLA-3.5W42–1346.5W42–13OY
Sat 9/21Indiana vs Charlotte-28.5W52–1450.0W52–14OY
Sat 9/28Indiana vs Maryland-7.5W42–2850.0W42–28OY
Sat 10/5Indiana vs Northwestern-12.5W41–2440.5W41–24OY
— Bye Week —
Sat 10/19Indiana vs Nebraska-6.5W56–748.0W56–7OY
Sat 10/26Indiana vs Washington-5.5W31–1754.0W31–17UY
Sat 11/2Indiana at Michigan State-7.5W47–1053.5W47–10OY
Sat 11/9Indiana vs Michigan-14.5W20–1547.5W20–15UN
— Bye Week —
Sat 11/23Indiana at Ohio State+10.5L15–3852.5L15–38ON
Sat 11/30Indiana vs Purdue-28.5W66–056.5W66–0OY
Fri 12/20Indiana at Notre Dame+7.0L17–2750.0L17–27UN
Advanced Stats
Advanced Analytics Matchup
Matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense) · 2024 season
Indiana PPA Edge
Agreement Signals — When All Metrics Agree
Elite · 83.1% ATS
PPA + PPO + SR + Havoc
All 4 Agree
→ Indiana
Elite · 82.4% ATS
PPA + PPO + Havoc
3 Agree
→ Indiana
Elite · 73.9% ATS
PPA + Success Rate
Both Agree
→ Indiana
Individual Factors — Ranked by Predictive Strength
PPA Overall
Points added per play · Elite predictor
Maryland #106
+0.216
Indiana #6
+0.524
Indiana Edge
PPA Passing
Pass efficiency edge · Strong predictor
Maryland #97
+0.345
Indiana #2
+0.873
Indiana Edge
Havoc Total
Def. disruption rate · Strong predictor
Maryland #103
0.142
Indiana #6
0.207
TFLs, sacks, PBUs, forced fumbles — higher is better
Indiana Edge
Points Per Opp
Drive-finishing edge · Strong predictor
Maryland #95
+7.280
Indiana #1
+9.374
Indiana Edge
Success Rate
Play consistency edge · Solid predictor
Maryland #92
+0.790
Indiana #2
+0.957
Indiana Edge
Field Position
Avg start (lower=better) · Solid predictor
Maryland #98
72.2
Indiana #4
65.5
Avg yards from own endzone to average start — lower is better · longer bar = better field position
Indiana Edge
Advanced stats sourced from CFBD · 2024 season · Edges are matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense)
Power Ratings
Team Power Ratings
Overall · Offense · Defense ratings · Updated as season progresses
Indiana Rated Higher
Overall Power Rating
Maryland
4.5
Indiana
25.7
Offense Rating
Maryland
17.5
Indiana
27.6
Defense Rating (lower = better defense)
Maryland
13.0
Indiana
1.9
Power ratings updated throughout the season as results accumulate
Momentum Control (CSS)
Consecutive Scoring Sequences Who builds scoring momentum?
Avg sequences created per game
Maryland #105
2.33
Indiana #37
2.33
Avg sequences allowed per game (lower is better)
Maryland #78
0.67
Indiana #8
0.33
Maryland +0.00
CSS Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 58.4% of games historically
Based on 3 games this season
Game Control (GC)
Win Probability Dominance Who controls games start to finish? Indiana Edge
Avg GC score per game (offense)
Maryland #1
67.5
Indiana #1
89.2
Avg GC score allowed per game (lower is better)
Maryland #112
14.0
Indiana #9
5.0
Indiana +21.7
GC Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 76% of games historically
Based on 4 games this season
Actual Result
CSS Battle
Indiana
1 — 0 sequences
GC Battle
Indiana
42.9 — 29.3 GC score
✓ Predicted correctly
Game Result
Indiana won by 14
Spread Context
ATS Historical Context
Based on 2021–2025 backtest · FBS vs FBS · Regular season

Both metrics agree on Indiana with a large edge. Historically, dominant teams like this are fully priced into the spread — the agreed-upon team covers just 50.2% of the time. The metrics predict game control better than they beat the number.

ATS data is informational only. Past cover rates do not guarantee future results.

Coaching Matchup
Maryland
Mike Locksley #1
29–33 (47%) · Yr 6 at school
OC Josh Gattis Yr 2 #1
DC Aazaar Abdul-Rahim Yr 1 #1
Staff Rating
0.00 #1
Indiana
Curt Cignetti #1
0–0 (0%) · Yr 1 at school
OC Mike Shanahan Yr 1 #1
DC Bryant Haines Yr 1 #1
Staff Rating
0.00 #1
About these metrics
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games.

Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: Momentum Control is a great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set.

Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: Game Control is another great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set.

Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself