Sat, Oct 16 2021
·
Week 7
·
🏟 Kenan Memorial Stadium
Chapel Hill, NC
·
Turf
·
62,980 cap
Miami✈ 691 miSame TZ
Matchup Prediction
North Carolina
has the edge in this matchup
Both Momentum Control (CSS) and Game Control metrics favor
North Carolina entering this game.
Momentum Control
71.6%
North Carolina wins
Solid
Game Control
76%
North Carolina wins
Strong
Vegas Spread
North Carolina -7.5
O/U 63.5
teamrankings
Advanced Stats
Advanced factors are split · No strong agreement signal
↓ See full breakdown
Miami 2021 Schedule
Miami's 2021 Schedule
| Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 9/4 | Miami vs Alabama | +19.5L13–44 | 61.5 | L13–44 | U | N |
| Sat 9/11 | Miami vs App State | -7.5W25–23 | 55.0 | W25–23 | U | N |
| Sat 9/18 | Miami vs Michigan State | -7.0L17–38 | 57.5 | L17–38 | U | N |
| Sat 9/25 | Miami vs Central Connecticut | -46.0W69–0 | 55.5 | W69–0 | O | Y |
| Thu 9/30 | Miami vs Virginia | -3.5L28–30 | 63.5 | L28–30 | U | N |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Sat 10/16 | Miami at North Carolina | +7.5L42–45 | 63.5 | L42–45 | O | Y |
| Sat 10/23 | Miami vs NC State | +3.5W31–30 | 54.5 | W31–30 | O | Y |
| Sat 10/30 | Miami at Pittsburgh | +9.5W38–34 | 61.0 | W38–34 | O | Y |
| Sat 11/6 | Miami vs Georgia Tech | -10.0W33–30 | 63.0 | W33–30 | U | N |
| Sat 11/13 | Miami at Florida State | -2.5L28–31 | 61.5 | L28–31 | U | N |
| Sat 11/20 | Miami vs Virginia Tech | -7.0W38–26 | 55.5 | W38–26 | O | Y |
| Sat 11/27 | Miami at Duke | -20.5W47–10 | 67.0 | W47–10 | U | Y |
North Carolina 2021 Schedule
North Carolina's 2021 Schedule
| Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 9/3 | North Carolina at Virginia Tech | -5.5L10–17 | 63.5 | L10–17 | U | N |
| Sat 9/11 | North Carolina vs Georgia State | -26.0W59–17 | 65.0 | W59–17 | O | Y |
| Sat 9/18 | North Carolina vs Virginia | -7.5W59–39 | 67.0 | W59–39 | O | Y |
| Sat 9/25 | North Carolina vs Georgia Tech | -14.5L22–45 | 66.0 | L22–45 | O | N |
| Sat 10/2 | North Carolina vs Duke | -19.5W38–7 | 74.0 | W38–7 | U | Y |
| Sat 10/9 | North Carolina vs Florida State | -17.5L25–35 | 64.5 | L25–35 | U | N |
| Sat 10/16 | North Carolina vs Miami | -7.5W45–42 | 63.5 | W45–42 | O | N |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Sat 10/30 | North Carolina at Notre Dame | +3.5L34–44 | 63.0 | L34–44 | O | N |
| Sat 11/6 | North Carolina vs Wake Forest | -2.5W58–55 | 78.0 | W58–55 | O | Y |
| Thu 11/11 | North Carolina at Pittsburgh | +6.5L23–30 | 72.0 | L23–30 | U | N |
| Sat 11/20 | North Carolina vs Wofford | -37.0W34–14 | 62.0 | W34–14 | U | N |
| Fri 11/26 | North Carolina at NC State | +6.5L30–34 | 62.0 | L30–34 | O | Y |
| Thu 12/30 | North Carolina vs South Carolina | -12.5L21–38 | 57.5 | L21–38 | O | N |
Advanced Stats
Advanced Analytics Matchup
Matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense) ·
2021 season
Agreement Signals — When All Metrics Agree
Elite · 83.1% ATS
PPA + PPO + SR + Havoc
Split
Metrics disagree
Elite · 82.4% ATS
PPA + PPO + Havoc
Split
Metrics disagree
Elite · 73.9% ATS
PPA + Success Rate
Split
Metrics disagree
Individual Factors — Ranked by Predictive Strength
PPA Overall
Points added per play · Elite predictor
PPA Passing
Pass efficiency edge · Strong predictor
Havoc Total
Def. disruption rate · Strong predictor
TFLs, sacks, PBUs, forced fumbles — higher is better
Points Per Opp
Drive-finishing edge · Strong predictor
Success Rate
Play consistency edge · Solid predictor
Field Position
Avg start (lower=better) · Solid predictor
Avg yards from own endzone to average start — lower is better · longer bar = better field position
Advanced stats sourced from CFBD · 2021 season ·
Edges are matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense)
Power Ratings
Team Power Ratings
Overall · Offense · Defense ratings · Updated as season progresses
Power ratings updated throughout the season as results accumulate
Momentum Control (CSS)
Consecutive Scoring Sequences
Who builds scoring momentum?
North Carolina Edge
North Carolina +1.58
CSS Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 71.6% of games historically
Based on 6 games this season
Game Control (GC)
Win Probability Dominance
Who controls games start to finish?
North Carolina Edge
North Carolina +20.4
GC Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 76% of games historically
Based on 6 games this season
Actual Result
CSS Battle
North Carolina
2 — 1 sequences
✓ Predicted correctly
GC Battle
North Carolina
91.5 — 6.2 GC score
✓ Predicted correctly
Game Result
North Carolina won by 3
✓ Model called it
Spread Context
ATS Historical Context
Based on 2021–2025 backtest · FBS vs FBS · Regular season
Both metrics agree on North Carolina with a large edge. Historically, dominant teams like this are fully priced into the spread — the agreed-upon team covers just 50.2% of the time. The metrics predict game control better than they beat the number.
ATS data is informational only. Past cover rates do not guarantee future results.
Coaching Matchup
Miami
Manny Diaz #1
15–12 (56%)
· Yr 3 at school
OC
Rhett Lashlee
Yr 1
#1
DC
Manny Diaz
Yr 1
#1
North Carolina
Mack Brown #1
17–11 (61%)
· Yr 3 at school
OC
Phil Longo
Yr 1
#1
DC
Jay Bateman
Yr 1
#1
About these metrics
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games. ✓
Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: Momentum Control is a great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: Game Control is another great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself ✓
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games. ✓
Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: Momentum Control is a great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: Game Control is another great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself ✓