Kent State at Sacramento State Week 9 College Football Matchup Kent State at Sacramento State Matchup - Week 9
Fri, Oct 30 2026 · Week 9 · 🏟 Hornet Stadium Sacramento, CA · Turf · 21,195 cap
Kent State✈ 2,116 mi-3 hr TZ
Preseason projection — This game has not yet been played and 2026 in-season data is not yet available. Edges are based on 2025 full-season performance. Confidence will increase once in-season games are logged.
📊 Punt & Rally Projection
Kent State
11
Sacramento State
27
P&R Line Sacramento State -15.5
P&R Total O/U 38
Confidence 28 New FBS Team
Matchup Prediction
Toss-up — no clear edge
Neither metric shows a meaningful pre-game edge in this matchup.
Momentum Control
58.4%
Lean
Game Control
76%
Sacramento State wins
Strong
Kent State 2026 Schedule
Kent State's 2026 Schedule
DateMatchupSpreadTotalResultO/UCover
Sat 9/5Kent State at South Carolina+26
Sat 9/12Kent State vs Wofford-5.5
Sat 9/19Kent State at Ohio State+36.5
Sat 9/26Kent State vs Ball State-7
Sat 10/3Kent State vs Ohio+8.5
Sat 10/10Kent State at Western Michigan+17
Sat 10/17Kent State at South Florida+27.5
Sat 10/24Kent State vs Akron+2.5
Fri 10/30Kent State at Sacramento State+15.5
— Bye Week —
Tue 11/10Kent State at Bowling Green+9.5
Tue 11/17Kent State vs Miami (OH)+14
Tue 11/24Kent State at Eastern Michigan+9
Sacramento State 2026 Schedule
Sacramento State's 2026 Schedule
DateMatchupSpreadTotalResultO/UCover
Sat 8/29Sacramento State at Eastern Michigan-4
Sat 9/5Sacramento State vs Mississippi Valley State-18.5
Sat 9/12Sacramento State at Fresno State+9.5
Sat 9/19Sacramento State vs North Dakota State+2.5
Sat 9/26Sacramento State vs Massachusetts-29
— Bye Week —
Sat 10/10Sacramento State at Bowling Green-3.5
Sat 10/17Sacramento State vs Ohio-4.5
Sat 10/24Sacramento State at Ball State-15
Fri 10/30Sacramento State vs Kent State-15.5
Wed 11/4Sacramento State vs Toledo+6.5
Wed 11/11Sacramento State at Central Michigan+0.5
— Bye Week —
Sat 11/28Sacramento State at Hawai'i+7
Power Ratings
Team Power Ratings
Overall · Offense · Defense ratings · Updated as season progresses
Sacramento State Rated Higher
Overall Power Rating
Kent State #126
-16.7
Sacramento State #114
-9.9
Offense Rating
Kent State #125
7.5
Sacramento State #113
9.7
Defense Rating (lower = better defense)
Kent State #130
24.2
Sacramento State #111
19.6
Power ratings updated throughout the season as results accumulate
Momentum Control (CSS)
Consecutive Scoring Sequences Who builds scoring momentum? Kent State Edge
Avg sequences created per game
Kent State #87
0.82
Sacramento State
0.00
Avg sequences allowed per game (lower is better)
Kent State #135
2.18
Sacramento State
0.00
Kent State +0.00
CSS Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 58.4% of games historically
Based on 2025 full season · preseason estimate
Game Control (GC)
Win Probability Dominance Who controls games start to finish? Sacramento State Edge
Avg GC score per game (offense)
Kent State #134
30.4
Sacramento State #16
52.7
Avg GC score allowed per game (lower is better)
Kent State #114
55.4
Sacramento State #12
21.8
Sacramento State +22.2
GC Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 76% of games historically
Based on 2025 full season · preseason estimate
Coaching Matchup
Kent State
Mark Carney #77
5–7 (42%) · Yr 2 at school
OC Clay Patterson Yr 1 #67
DC Cherokee Valeria Yr 1 #68
Staff Rating
2.50 #89
Sacramento State
Alonzo Carter #77
0–0 (0%) · Yr 1 at school
OC Eric Kiesau Yr 1 #118
DC Adam Clark Yr 1 #68
Staff Rating
2.39 #98
About these metrics
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games.

Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: CSS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set.

Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: GS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set.

Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself