Sat, Oct 10 2026
·
Week 6
·
🏟 Doyt Perry Stadium
Bowling Green, OH
·
Turf
·
24,000 cap
Sacramento State✈ 1,995 mi+3 hr TZ
Preseason projection — This game has not yet been played and 2026 in-season data is not yet available.
Edges are based on 2025 full-season performance.
Confidence will increase once in-season games are logged.
Matchup Prediction
Toss-up — no clear edge
Neither metric shows a meaningful pre-game edge in this matchup.
Momentum Control
58.4%
—
Lean
Game Control
64.9%
Sacramento State wins
Lean
Sacramento State 2026 Schedule
Sacramento State's 2026 Schedule
| Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 8/29 | Sacramento State at Eastern Michigan | -4 | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/5 | Sacramento State vs Mississippi Valley State | -18.5 | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/12 | Sacramento State at Fresno State | +9.5 | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/19 | Sacramento State vs North Dakota State | +2.5 | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/26 | Sacramento State vs Massachusetts | -29 | — | — | — | — |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Sat 10/10 | Sacramento State at Bowling Green | -3.5 | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/17 | Sacramento State vs Ohio | -4.5 | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/24 | Sacramento State at Ball State | -15 | — | — | — | — |
| Fri 10/30 | Sacramento State vs Kent State | -15.5 | — | — | — | — |
| Wed 11/4 | Sacramento State vs Toledo | +6.5 | — | — | — | — |
| Wed 11/11 | Sacramento State at Central Michigan | +0.5 | — | — | — | — |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Sat 11/28 | Sacramento State at Hawai'i | +7 | — | — | — | — |
Bowling Green 2026 Schedule
Bowling Green's 2026 Schedule
| Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 9/5 | Bowling Green vs Tarleton State | -12.5 | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/12 | Bowling Green at Nebraska | +19 | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/19 | Bowling Green at Iowa State | +20.5 | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/26 | Bowling Green vs South Florida | +15.5 | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/3 | Bowling Green at Miami (OH) | +12.5 | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/10 | Bowling Green vs Sacramento State | +3.5 | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/17 | Bowling Green vs Ball State | -13.5 | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/24 | Bowling Green at Buffalo | +4.5 | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/31 | Bowling Green at Western Michigan | +10.5 | — | — | — | — |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Tue 11/10 | Bowling Green vs Kent State | -9.5 | — | — | — | — |
| Wed 11/18 | Bowling Green at Toledo | +17.5 | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/28 | Bowling Green vs Massachusetts | -23.5 | — | — | — | — |
Power Ratings
Team Power Ratings
Overall · Offense · Defense ratings · Updated as season progresses
Power ratings updated throughout the season as results accumulate
Momentum Control (CSS)
Consecutive Scoring Sequences
Who builds scoring momentum?
Sacramento State Edge
Sacramento State +0.00
CSS Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 58.4% of games historically
Based on 2025 full season · preseason estimate
Game Control (GC)
Win Probability Dominance
Who controls games start to finish?
Sacramento State Edge
Sacramento State +16.5
GC Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 64.9% of games historically
Based on 2025 full season · preseason estimate
Coaching Matchup
Sacramento State
Alonzo Carter #77
0–0 (0%)
· Yr 1 at school
OC
Eric Kiesau
Yr 1
#118
DC
Adam Clark
Yr 1
#68
Bowling Green
Eddie George #111
4–8 (33%)
· Yr 2 at school
OC
Greg Nosal
Yr 3
#127
DC
Brandon Fisher
Yr 1
#68
About these metrics
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games. ✓
Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: Momentum Control is a great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: Game Control is another great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself ✓
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games. ✓
Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: Momentum Control is a great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: Game Control is another great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself ✓