Sat, Sep 7 2024
·
Week 2
·
🏟 Brooks Stadium
Conway, SC
·
Turf
·
9,214 cap
William & Mary✈ 273 miSame TZ
Preseason projection — This game has not yet been played and 2024 in-season data is not yet available.
Edges are based on 2023 full-season performance.
Confidence will increase once in-season games are logged.
Matchup Prediction
Toss-up — no clear edge
Neither metric shows a meaningful pre-game edge in this matchup.
Momentum Control
58.4%
—
Lean
Game Control
76%
Coastal Carolina wins
Strong
Vegas Spread
Coastal Carolina -17.5
O/U 0.0
ESPN Bet
William & Mary 2024 Schedule
William & Mary's 2024 Schedule
| Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Sat 9/7 | William & Mary at Coastal Carolina | +17.5L21–40 | 0.0 | L21–40 | O | N |
Coastal Carolina 2024 Schedule
Coastal Carolina's 2024 Schedule
| Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 8/29 | Coastal Carolina at Jacksonville State | +3.5W55–27 | 54.5 | W55–27 | O | Y |
| Sat 9/7 | Coastal Carolina vs William & Mary | -17.5W40–21 | 0.0 | W40–21 | O | Y |
| Sat 9/14 | Coastal Carolina at Temple | -17.5W28–20 | 51.5 | W28–20 | U | N |
| Sat 9/21 | Coastal Carolina vs Virginia | +3.5L24–43 | 52.0 | L24–43 | O | N |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Sat 10/5 | Coastal Carolina vs Old Dominion | -4.0W45–37 | 51.5 | W45–37 | O | Y |
| Thu 10/10 | Coastal Carolina at James Madison | +7.0L7–39 | 59.0 | L7–39 | U | N |
| Sat 10/19 | Coastal Carolina vs Louisiana | +6.0L24–34 | 57.0 | L24–34 | O | N |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Sat 11/2 | Coastal Carolina at Troy | -4.0L24–38 | 52.0 | L24–38 | O | N |
| Thu 11/7 | Coastal Carolina vs App State | +1.5W38–24 | 62.5 | W38–24 | U | Y |
| Sat 11/16 | Coastal Carolina at Marshall | +7.5L19–31 | 57.0 | L19–31 | U | N |
| Sat 11/23 | Coastal Carolina vs Georgia Southern | -2.0L6–26 | 59.5 | L6–26 | U | N |
| Sat 11/30 | Coastal Carolina at Georgia State | +0.5W48–27 | 52.5 | W48–27 | O | Y |
| Mon 12/23 | Coastal Carolina at UTSA | +12.5L15–44 | 56.5 | L15–44 | O | N |
Momentum Control (CSS)
Consecutive Scoring Sequences
Who builds scoring momentum?
William & Mary Edge
William & Mary +0.00
CSS Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 58.4% of games historically
Based on 2023 full season · preseason estimate
Game Control (GC)
Win Probability Dominance
Who controls games start to finish?
Coastal Carolina Edge
Coastal Carolina +23.3
GC Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 76% of games historically
Based on 2023 full season · preseason estimate
About these metrics
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games. ✓
Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: Momentum Control is a great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: Game Control is another great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself ✓
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games. ✓
Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: Momentum Control is a great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: Game Control is another great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself ✓