Sat, Oct 15 2022
·
Week 7
·
🏟 Doyt Perry Stadium
Bowling Green, OH
·
Turf
·
24,000 cap
Miami (OH)✈ 141 miSame TZ
Matchup Prediction
Metrics disagree on this matchup
Momentum Control favors Bowling Green,
while Game Control favors Miami (OH).
Split signals historically show weaker predictive confidence — treat as a toss-up.
⚡ Split Signal — Metrics Disagree
Momentum Control
58.4%
Bowling Green wins
Lean
Game Control
64.9%
Miami (OH) wins
Lean
Vegas Spread
Miami (OH) -7
O/U 45.0
teamrankings
Advanced Stats
PPA + Success Rate agree → Bowling Green
· 73.9% ATS historically
↓ See full breakdown
Miami (OH) 2022 Schedule
Miami (OH)'s 2022 Schedule
| Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 9/3 | Miami (OH) at Kentucky | +15.0L13–37 | 55.0 | L13–37 | U | N |
| Sat 9/10 | Miami (OH) vs Robert Morris | -30.0W31–14 | 54.0 | W31–14 | U | N |
| Sat 9/17 | Miami (OH) vs Cincinnati | +24.0L17–38 | 51.0 | L17–38 | O | Y |
| Sat 9/24 | Miami (OH) at Northwestern | +7.5W17–14 | 50.0 | W17–14 | U | Y |
| Sat 10/1 | Miami (OH) at Buffalo | +3.0L20–24 | 50.0 | L20–24 | U | N |
| Sat 10/8 | Miami (OH) vs Kent State | +5.0W27–24 | 56.5 | W27–24 | U | Y |
| Sat 10/15 | Miami (OH) at Bowling Green | -7.0L13–17 | 45.0 | L13–17 | U | N |
| Sat 10/22 | Miami (OH) vs Western Michigan | -7.0L10–16 | 44.0 | L10–16 | U | N |
| Sat 10/29 | Miami (OH) at Akron | -9.0W27–9 | 51.5 | W27–9 | U | Y |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Tue 11/8 | Miami (OH) vs Ohio | +2.5L21–37 | 52.0 | L21–37 | O | N |
| Wed 11/16 | Miami (OH) at Northern Illinois | +1.0W29–23 | 44.0 | W29–23 | O | Y |
| Tue 11/22 | Miami (OH) vs Ball State | -2.5W18–17 | 45.0 | W18–17 | U | N |
| Fri 12/16 | Miami (OH) vs UAB | +11.0L20–24 | 44.5 | L20–24 | U | Y |
Bowling Green 2022 Schedule
Bowling Green's 2022 Schedule
| Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 9/3 | Bowling Green at UCLA | +24.0L17–45 | 56.5 | L17–45 | O | N |
| Sat 9/10 | Bowling Green vs Eastern Kentucky | -7.5L57–59 | 57.0 | L57–59 | O | N |
| Sat 9/17 | Bowling Green vs Marshall | +17.0W34–31 | 50.0 | W34–31 | O | Y |
| Sat 9/24 | Bowling Green at Mississippi State | +31.0L14–45 | 53.0 | L14–45 | O | Y |
| Sat 10/1 | Bowling Green at Akron | -9.0W31–28 | 49.5 | W31–28 | O | N |
| Sat 10/8 | Bowling Green vs Buffalo | +2.0L7–38 | 55.5 | L7–38 | U | N |
| Sat 10/15 | Bowling Green vs Miami (OH) | +7.0W17–13 | 45.0 | W17–13 | U | Y |
| Sat 10/22 | Bowling Green at Central Michigan | +5.5W34–18 | 51.0 | W34–18 | O | Y |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Wed 11/2 | Bowling Green vs Western Michigan | -5.0W13–9 | 48.0 | W13–9 | U | N |
| Wed 11/9 | Bowling Green vs Kent State | +2.5L6–40 | 55.5 | L6–40 | U | N |
| Tue 11/15 | Bowling Green at Toledo | +14.5W42–35 | 47.0 | W42–35 | O | Y |
| Tue 11/22 | Bowling Green at Ohio | +5.5L14–38 | 52.5 | L14–38 | U | N |
| Mon 12/26 | Bowling Green vs New Mexico State | -3.0L19–24 | 51.0 | L19–24 | U | N |
Advanced Stats
Advanced Analytics Matchup
Matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense) ·
2022 season
Agreement Signals — When All Metrics Agree
Elite · 83.1% ATS
PPA + PPO + SR + Havoc
Split
Metrics disagree
Elite · 82.4% ATS
PPA + PPO + Havoc
Split
Metrics disagree
Elite · 73.9% ATS
PPA + Success Rate
Both Agree
→ Bowling Green
Individual Factors — Ranked by Predictive Strength
PPA Overall
Points added per play · Elite predictor
PPA Passing
Pass efficiency edge · Strong predictor
Havoc Total
Def. disruption rate · Strong predictor
TFLs, sacks, PBUs, forced fumbles — higher is better
Points Per Opp
Drive-finishing edge · Strong predictor
Success Rate
Play consistency edge · Solid predictor
Field Position
Avg start (lower=better) · Solid predictor
Avg yards from own endzone to average start — lower is better · longer bar = better field position
Advanced stats sourced from CFBD · 2022 season ·
Edges are matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense)
Power Ratings
Team Power Ratings
Overall · Offense · Defense ratings · Updated as season progresses
Power ratings updated throughout the season as results accumulate
Momentum Control (CSS)
Consecutive Scoring Sequences
Who builds scoring momentum?
Bowling Green Edge
Bowling Green +0.17
CSS Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 58.4% of games historically
Based on 6 games this season
Game Control (GC)
Win Probability Dominance
Who controls games start to finish?
Miami (OH) Edge
Miami (OH) +11.3
GC Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 64.9% of games historically
Based on 6 games this season
Spread Context
ATS Historical Context
Based on 2021–2025 backtest · FBS vs FBS · Regular season
CSS and GC disagree on this matchup. When the metrics split, historical cover rates are essentially random — treat this as a coin flip against the spread.
ATS data is informational only. Past cover rates do not guarantee future results.
Coaching Matchup
Miami (OH)
Chuck Martin #1
39–52 (43%)
· Yr 9 at school
OC
Eric Koehler
Yr 2
#1
DC
Bill Brechin
Yr 1
#1
Bowling Green
Scot Loeffler #1
7–22 (24%)
· Yr 4 at school
OC
Terry Malone
Yr 2
#1
DC
Eric Lewis
Yr 2
#1
About these metrics
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games. ✓
Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: CSS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: GS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself ✓
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games. ✓
Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: CSS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: GS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself ✓