Matchup Prediction
Toss-up — no clear edge
Neither metric shows a meaningful pre-game edge in this matchup.
Momentum Control
58.4%
—
Lean
Game Control
76%
TCU wins
Strong
Vegas Spread
TCU -21
O/U 64.0
teamrankings
Advanced Stats
PPA + Success Rate agree → TCU
· 73.9% ATS historically
↓ See full breakdown
Kansas 2021 Schedule
Kansas's 2021 Schedule
| Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 9/3 | Kansas vs South Dakota | -11.5W17–14 | 55.5 | W17–14 | U | N |
| Fri 9/10 | Kansas at Coastal Carolina | +26.5L22–49 | 52.0 | L22–49 | O | N |
| Sat 9/18 | Kansas vs Baylor | +17.0L7–45 | 48.5 | L7–45 | O | N |
| Sat 9/25 | Kansas at Duke | +16.5L33–52 | 57.5 | L33–52 | O | N |
| Sat 10/2 | Kansas at Iowa State | +34.5L7–59 | 57.5 | L7–59 | O | N |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Sat 10/16 | Kansas vs Texas Tech | +18.5L14–41 | 67.5 | L14–41 | U | N |
| Sat 10/23 | Kansas vs Oklahoma | +38.0L23–35 | 66.5 | L23–35 | U | Y |
| Sat 10/30 | Kansas at Oklahoma State | +28.5L3–55 | 54.5 | L3–55 | O | N |
| Sat 11/6 | Kansas vs Kansas State | +24.0L10–35 | 56.0 | L10–35 | U | N |
| Sat 11/13 | Kansas at Texas | +31.0W57–56 | 61.5 | W57–56 | O | Y |
| Sat 11/20 | Kansas at TCU | +21.0L28–31 | 64.0 | L28–31 | U | Y |
| Sat 11/27 | Kansas vs West Virginia | +15.5L28–34 | 55.5 | L28–34 | O | Y |
TCU 2021 Schedule
TCU's 2021 Schedule
| Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 9/4 | TCU vs Duquesne | -42.0W45–3 | 54.5 | W45–3 | U | N |
| Sat 9/11 | TCU vs California | -11.5W34–32 | 46.5 | W34–32 | O | N |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Sat 9/25 | TCU vs SMU | -8.0L34–42 | 66.0 | L34–42 | O | N |
| Sat 10/2 | TCU vs Texas | +3.5L27–32 | 65.5 | L27–32 | U | N |
| Sat 10/9 | TCU at Texas Tech | -2.5W52–31 | 60.0 | W52–31 | O | Y |
| Sat 10/16 | TCU at Oklahoma | +12.5L31–52 | 64.5 | L31–52 | O | N |
| Sat 10/23 | TCU vs West Virginia | -5.0L17–29 | 58.0 | L17–29 | U | N |
| Sat 10/30 | TCU at Kansas State | +3.5L12–31 | 58.5 | L12–31 | U | N |
| Sat 11/6 | TCU vs Baylor | +7.5W30–28 | 57.0 | W30–28 | O | Y |
| Sat 11/13 | TCU at Oklahoma State | +11.0L17–63 | 53.5 | L17–63 | O | N |
| Sat 11/20 | TCU vs Kansas | -21.0W31–28 | 64.0 | W31–28 | U | N |
| Fri 11/26 | TCU at Iowa State | +16.0L14–48 | 61.5 | L14–48 | O | N |
Advanced Stats
Advanced Analytics Matchup
Matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense) ·
2021 season
Agreement Signals — When All Metrics Agree
Elite · 83.1% ATS
PPA + PPO + SR + Havoc
Split
Metrics disagree
Elite · 82.4% ATS
PPA + PPO + Havoc
Split
Metrics disagree
Elite · 73.9% ATS
PPA + Success Rate
Both Agree
→ TCU
Individual Factors — Ranked by Predictive Strength
PPA Overall
Points added per play · Elite predictor
PPA Passing
Pass efficiency edge · Strong predictor
Havoc Total
Def. disruption rate · Strong predictor
TFLs, sacks, PBUs, forced fumbles — higher is better
Points Per Opp
Drive-finishing edge · Strong predictor
Success Rate
Play consistency edge · Solid predictor
Field Position
Avg start (lower=better) · Solid predictor
Avg yards from own endzone to average start — lower is better · longer bar = better field position
Advanced stats sourced from CFBD · 2021 season ·
Edges are matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense)
Power Ratings
Team Power Ratings
Overall · Offense · Defense ratings · Updated as season progresses
Power ratings updated throughout the season as results accumulate
Momentum Control (CSS)
Consecutive Scoring Sequences
Who builds scoring momentum?
Kansas +0.00
CSS Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 58.4% of games historically
Based on 9 games this season
Game Control (GC)
Win Probability Dominance
Who controls games start to finish?
TCU Edge
TCU +21.3
GC Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 76% of games historically
Based on 10 games this season
Actual Result
CSS Battle
Tie
2 — 2 sequences
GC Battle
TCU
67.3 — 13.0 GC score
✓ Predicted correctly
Game Result
TCU won by 3
Spread Context
ATS Historical Context
Based on 2021–2025 backtest · FBS vs FBS · Regular season
Both metrics agree on TCU with a large edge. Historically, dominant teams like this are fully priced into the spread — the agreed-upon team covers just 50.2% of the time. The metrics predict game control better than they beat the number.
ATS data is informational only. Past cover rates do not guarantee future results.
Coaching Matchup
Kansas
Lance Leipold #1
1–2 (33%)
· Yr 1 at school
OC
Andy Kotelnicki
Yr 1
#1
DC
Brian Borland
Yr 1
#1
TCU
Gary Patterson #1
180–74 (71%)
· Yr 22 at school
OC
Doug Meacham
Yr 1
#1
DC
Chad Glasgow
Yr 1
#1
About these metrics
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games. ✓
Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: Momentum Control is a great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: Game Control is another great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself ✓
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games. ✓
Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: Momentum Control is a great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: Game Control is another great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself ✓