Matchup Prediction
Metrics disagree on this matchup
Momentum Control favors Buffalo,
while Game Control favors Akron.
Split signals historically show weaker predictive confidence — treat as a toss-up.
⚡ Split Signal — Metrics Disagree
Momentum Control
61.3%
Buffalo wins
Lean
Game Control
67.1%
Akron wins
Solid
Vegas Spread
Akron -3
O/U 53.0
William Hill (New Jersey)
Advanced Stats
Advanced factors are split · No strong agreement signal
↓ See full breakdown
Buffalo 2023 Schedule
Buffalo's 2023 Schedule
| Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 9/2 | Buffalo at Wisconsin | +29.0L17–38 | 52.5 | L17–38 | O | Y |
| Sat 9/9 | Buffalo vs Fordham | -23.5L37–40 | 55.5 | L37–40 | O | N |
| Sat 9/16 | Buffalo vs Liberty | +2.5L27–55 | 54.0 | L27–55 | O | N |
| Sat 9/23 | Buffalo at Louisiana | +10.5L38–45 | 57.5 | L38–45 | O | Y |
| Sat 9/30 | Buffalo at Akron | +3.0W13–10 | 53.0 | W13–10 | U | Y |
| Sat 10/7 | Buffalo vs Central Michigan | +2.5W37–13 | 51.5 | W37–13 | U | Y |
| Sat 10/14 | Buffalo vs Bowling Green | -3.0L14–24 | 44.5 | L14–24 | U | N |
| Sat 10/21 | Buffalo at Kent State | -6.5W24–6 | 44.0 | W24–6 | U | Y |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Tue 10/31 | Buffalo at Toledo | +14.0L13–31 | 47.0 | L13–31 | U | N |
| Tue 11/7 | Buffalo vs Ohio | +9.5L10–20 | 45.5 | L10–20 | U | N |
| Wed 11/15 | Buffalo at Miami (OH) | +7.5L10–23 | 36.5 | L10–23 | U | N |
| Tue 11/21 | Buffalo vs Eastern Michigan | -6.5L11–24 | 38.5 | L11–24 | U | N |
Akron 2023 Schedule
Akron's 2023 Schedule
| Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 9/2 | Akron at Temple | +9.5L21–24 | 55.0 | L21–24 | U | Y |
| Sat 9/9 | Akron vs Morgan State | -25.0W24–21 | 46.0 | W24–21 | U | N |
| Sat 9/16 | Akron at Kentucky | +25.0L3–35 | 48.5 | L3–35 | U | N |
| Sat 9/23 | Akron at Indiana | +16.5L27–29 | 45.5 | L27–29 | O | Y |
| Sat 9/30 | Akron vs Buffalo | -3.0L10–13 | 53.0 | L10–13 | U | N |
| Sat 10/7 | Akron vs Northern Illinois | +4.0L14–55 | 42.5 | L14–55 | O | N |
| Sat 10/14 | Akron at Central Michigan | +10.5L10–17 | 44.0 | L10–17 | U | Y |
| Sat 10/21 | Akron at Bowling Green | +7.0L14–41 | 37.0 | L14–41 | O | N |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Wed 11/1 | Akron vs Kent State | -4.0W31–27 | 39.0 | W31–27 | O | N |
| Wed 11/8 | Akron at Miami (OH) | +17.5L0–19 | 37.5 | L0–19 | U | N |
| Tue 11/14 | Akron at Eastern Michigan | +3.5L27–30 | 39.5 | L27–30 | O | Y |
| Fri 11/24 | Akron vs Ohio | +13.5L14–25 | 41.5 | L14–25 | U | Y |
Advanced Stats
Advanced Analytics Matchup
Matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense) ·
2023 season
Agreement Signals — When All Metrics Agree
Elite · 83.1% ATS
PPA + PPO + SR + Havoc
Split
Metrics disagree
Elite · 82.4% ATS
PPA + PPO + Havoc
Split
Metrics disagree
Elite · 73.9% ATS
PPA + Success Rate
Split
Metrics disagree
Individual Factors — Ranked by Predictive Strength
PPA Overall
Points added per play · Elite predictor
PPA Passing
Pass efficiency edge · Strong predictor
Havoc Total
Def. disruption rate · Strong predictor
TFLs, sacks, PBUs, forced fumbles — higher is better
Points Per Opp
Drive-finishing edge · Strong predictor
Success Rate
Play consistency edge · Solid predictor
Field Position
Avg start (lower=better) · Solid predictor
Avg yards from own endzone to average start — lower is better · longer bar = better field position
Advanced stats sourced from CFBD · 2023 season ·
Edges are matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense)
Power Ratings
Team Power Ratings
Overall · Offense · Defense ratings · Updated as season progresses
Power ratings updated throughout the season as results accumulate
Momentum Control (CSS)
Consecutive Scoring Sequences
Who builds scoring momentum?
Buffalo Edge
Buffalo +0.33
CSS Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 61.3% of games historically
Based on 3 games this season
Game Control (GC)
Win Probability Dominance
Who controls games start to finish?
Akron Edge
Akron +13.9
GC Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 67.1% of games historically
Based on 4 games this season
Spread Context
ATS Historical Context
Based on 2021–2025 backtest · FBS vs FBS · Regular season
CSS and GC disagree on this matchup. When the metrics split, historical cover rates are essentially random — treat this as a coin flip against the spread.
ATS data is informational only. Past cover rates do not guarantee future results.
Coaching Matchup
Buffalo
Maurice Linguist #1
11–17 (39%)
· Yr 3 at school
OC
DJ Mangas
Yr 1
#1
DC
Robert Wright
Yr 1
#1
Akron
Joe Moorhead #1
3–12 (20%)
· Yr 2 at school
OC
Billy Fessler
Yr 1
#1
DC
Tim Tibesar
Yr 2
#1
About these metrics
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games. ✓
Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: Momentum Control is a great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: Game Control is another great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself ✓
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games. ✓
Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: Momentum Control is a great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: Game Control is another great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself ✓