Sat, Nov 4 2023
·
Week 10
·
🏟 Boone Pickens Stadium
Stillwater, OK
·
Turf
·
60,218 cap
Matchup Prediction
Oklahoma
has the edge in this matchup
Both Momentum Control (CSS) and Game Control metrics favor
Oklahoma entering this game.
Momentum Control
61.3%
Oklahoma wins
Lean
Game Control
64.9%
Oklahoma wins
Lean
Vegas Spread
Oklahoma -6
O/U 61.5
DraftKings
Advanced Stats
All 4 factors agree → Oklahoma
· 83.1% ATS historically when all four align
↓ See full breakdown
Oklahoma 2023 Schedule
Oklahoma's 2023 Schedule
| Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 9/2 | Oklahoma vs Arkansas State | -36.0W73–0 | 57.5 | W73–0 | O | Y |
| Sat 9/9 | Oklahoma vs SMU | -16.5W28–11 | 68.5 | W28–11 | U | Y |
| Sat 9/16 | Oklahoma at Tulsa | -28.0W66–17 | 58.5 | W66–17 | O | Y |
| Sat 9/23 | Oklahoma at Cincinnati | -13.0W20–6 | 58.0 | W20–6 | U | Y |
| Sat 9/30 | Oklahoma vs Iowa State | -19.5W50–20 | 48.5 | W50–20 | O | Y |
| Sat 10/7 | Oklahoma vs Texas | +4.0W34–30 | 62.0 | W34–30 | O | Y |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Sat 10/21 | Oklahoma vs UCF | -17.0W31–29 | 67.5 | W31–29 | U | N |
| Sat 10/28 | Oklahoma at Kansas | -7.0L33–38 | 66.5 | L33–38 | O | N |
| Sat 11/4 | Oklahoma at Oklahoma State | -6.0L24–27 | 61.5 | L24–27 | U | N |
| Sat 11/11 | Oklahoma vs West Virginia | -13.5W59–20 | 59.5 | W59–20 | O | Y |
| Sat 11/18 | Oklahoma at BYU | -24.5W31–24 | 58.5 | W31–24 | U | N |
| Fri 11/24 | Oklahoma vs TCU | -12.5W69–45 | 66.5 | W69–45 | O | Y |
| Thu 12/28 | Oklahoma vs Arizona | +2.5L24–38 | 59.5 | L24–38 | O | N |
Oklahoma State 2023 Schedule
Oklahoma State's 2023 Schedule
| Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 9/2 | Oklahoma State vs Central Arkansas | -25.5W27–13 | 59.5 | W27–13 | U | N |
| Sat 9/9 | Oklahoma State at Arizona State | -2.5W27–15 | 53.5 | W27–15 | U | Y |
| Sat 9/16 | Oklahoma State vs South Alabama | -7.0L7–33 | 49.5 | L7–33 | U | N |
| Sat 9/23 | Oklahoma State at Iowa State | +3.5L27–34 | 36.0 | L27–34 | O | N |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Fri 10/6 | Oklahoma State vs Kansas State | +11.5W29–21 | 53.5 | W29–21 | U | Y |
| Sat 10/14 | Oklahoma State vs Kansas | +3.0W39–32 | 54.0 | W39–32 | O | Y |
| Sat 10/21 | Oklahoma State at West Virginia | +3.0W48–34 | 48.0 | W48–34 | O | Y |
| Sat 10/28 | Oklahoma State vs Cincinnati | -7.0W45–13 | 53.0 | W45–13 | O | Y |
| Sat 11/4 | Oklahoma State vs Oklahoma | +6.0W27–24 | 61.5 | W27–24 | U | Y |
| Sat 11/11 | Oklahoma State at UCF | -2.5L3–45 | 63.5 | L3–45 | U | N |
| Sat 11/18 | Oklahoma State at Houston | -6.5W43–30 | 56.5 | W43–30 | O | Y |
| Sat 11/25 | Oklahoma State vs BYU | -15.5W40–34 | 55.5 | W40–34 | O | N |
| Sat 12/2 | Oklahoma State vs Texas | +14.0L21–49 | 55.0 | L21–49 | O | N |
| Wed 12/27 | Oklahoma State vs Texas A&M | -4.0W31–23 | 56.0 | W31–23 | U | Y |
Advanced Stats
Advanced Analytics Matchup
Matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense) ·
2023 season
Agreement Signals — When All Metrics Agree
Elite · 83.1% ATS
PPA + PPO + SR + Havoc
All 4 Agree
→ Oklahoma
Elite · 82.4% ATS
PPA + PPO + Havoc
3 Agree
→ Oklahoma
Elite · 73.9% ATS
PPA + Success Rate
Both Agree
→ Oklahoma
Individual Factors — Ranked by Predictive Strength
PPA Overall
Points added per play · Elite predictor
PPA Passing
Pass efficiency edge · Strong predictor
Havoc Total
Def. disruption rate · Strong predictor
TFLs, sacks, PBUs, forced fumbles — higher is better
Points Per Opp
Drive-finishing edge · Strong predictor
Success Rate
Play consistency edge · Solid predictor
Field Position
Avg start (lower=better) · Solid predictor
Avg yards from own endzone to average start — lower is better · longer bar = better field position
Advanced stats sourced from CFBD · 2023 season ·
Edges are matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense)
Power Ratings
Team Power Ratings
Overall · Offense · Defense ratings · Updated as season progresses
Power ratings updated throughout the season as results accumulate
Momentum Control (CSS)
Consecutive Scoring Sequences
Who builds scoring momentum?
Oklahoma Edge
Oklahoma +0.95
CSS Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 61.3% of games historically
Based on 7 games this season
Game Control (GC)
Win Probability Dominance
Who controls games start to finish?
Oklahoma Edge
Oklahoma +16.9
GC Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 64.9% of games historically
Based on 8 games this season
Actual Result
CSS Battle
Oklahoma State
2 — 0 sequences
✗ Predicted incorrectly
GC Battle
Oklahoma State
44.7 — 28.2 GC score
✗ Predicted incorrectly
Game Result
Oklahoma State won by 3
✗ Model missed it
Spread Context
ATS Historical Context
Based on 2021–2025 backtest · FBS vs FBS · Regular season
Both metrics agree on Oklahoma with a solid GC edge. Teams with this profile have covered 53.0% of the time historically (n=330) — a mild lean.
ATS data is informational only. Past cover rates do not guarantee future results.
Coaching Matchup
Oklahoma
Brent Venables #1
9–7 (56%)
· Yr 2 at school
OC
Jeff Lebby
Yr 2
#1
DC
Todd Bates
Yr 2
#1
Oklahoma State
Mike Gundy #1
158–76 (68%)
· Yr 19 at school
OC
Kasey Dunn
Yr 3
#1
DC
Jim Bob Clements
Yr 1
#1
About these metrics
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games. ✓
Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: Momentum Control is a great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: Game Control is another great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself ✓
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games. ✓
Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: Momentum Control is a great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: Game Control is another great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself ✓