Sat, Sep 16 2023
·
Week 3
·
🏟 Alumni Stadium
Chestnut Hill, MA
·
Turf
·
44,500 cap
Florida State✈ 1,097 miSame TZ
Matchup Prediction
Florida State
has the edge in this matchup
Both Momentum Control (CSS) and Game Control metrics favor
Florida State entering this game.
Momentum Control
80.6%
Florida State wins
Strong
Game Control
64.9%
Florida State wins
Lean
Vegas Spread
Florida State -25.5
O/U 48.0
William Hill (New Jersey)
Advanced Stats
All 4 factors agree → Florida State
· 83.1% ATS historically when all four align
↓ See full breakdown
Florida State 2023 Schedule
Florida State's 2023 Schedule
| Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 9/3 | Florida State vs LSU | +2.0W45–24 | 56.5 | W45–24 | O | Y |
| Sat 9/9 | Florida State vs Southern Miss | -31.0W66–13 | 54.0 | W66–13 | O | Y |
| Sat 9/16 | Florida State at Boston College | -25.5W31–29 | 48.0 | W31–29 | O | N |
| Sat 9/23 | Florida State at Clemson | -2.0W31–24 | 55.5 | W31–24 | U | Y |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Sat 10/7 | Florida State vs Virginia Tech | -23.5W39–17 | 52.5 | W39–17 | O | N |
| Sat 10/14 | Florida State vs Syracuse | -18.5W41–3 | 53.5 | W41–3 | U | Y |
| Sat 10/21 | Florida State vs Duke | -14.0W38–20 | 49.0 | W38–20 | O | Y |
| Sat 10/28 | Florida State at Wake Forest | -21.0W41–16 | 53.5 | W41–16 | O | Y |
| Sat 11/4 | Florida State at Pittsburgh | -21.5W24–7 | 50.0 | W24–7 | U | N |
| Sat 11/11 | Florida State vs Miami | -14.5W27–20 | 50.5 | W27–20 | U | N |
| Sat 11/18 | Florida State vs North Alabama | -31 | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/25 | Florida State at Florida | -6.0W24–15 | 51.0 | W24–15 | U | Y |
| Sat 12/2 | Florida State vs Louisville | -3.5W16–6 | 51.0 | W16–6 | U | Y |
| Sat 12/30 | Florida State vs Georgia | +23.5L3–63 | 47.0 | L3–63 | O | N |
Boston College 2023 Schedule
Boston College's 2023 Schedule
| Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 9/2 | Boston College vs Northern Illinois | -8.0L24–27 | 50.0 | L24–27 | O | N |
| Sat 9/9 | Boston College vs Holy Cross | -10.0W31–28 | 52.0 | W31–28 | O | N |
| Sat 9/16 | Boston College vs Florida State | +25.5L29–31 | 48.0 | L29–31 | O | Y |
| Sat 9/23 | Boston College at Louisville | +14.0L28–56 | 53.0 | L28–56 | O | N |
| Sat 9/30 | Boston College vs Virginia | -5.0W27–24 | 52.5 | W27–24 | U | N |
| Sat 10/7 | Boston College at Army | +2.5W27–24 | 47.0 | W27–24 | O | Y |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Sat 10/21 | Boston College at Georgia Tech | +5.5W38–23 | 57.0 | W38–23 | O | Y |
| Sat 10/28 | Boston College vs UConn | -14.5W21–14 | 49.0 | W21–14 | U | N |
| Fri 11/3 | Boston College at Syracuse | +3.0W17–10 | 51.0 | W17–10 | U | Y |
| Sat 11/11 | Boston College vs Virginia Tech | +2.5L22–48 | 48.5 | L22–48 | O | N |
| Thu 11/16 | Boston College at Pittsburgh | +1.0L16–24 | 47.0 | L16–24 | U | N |
| Fri 11/24 | Boston College vs Miami | +13.5L20–45 | 50.5 | L20–45 | O | N |
| Thu 12/28 | Boston College vs SMU | +13.5W23–14 | 49.0 | W23–14 | U | Y |
Advanced Stats
Advanced Analytics Matchup
Matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense) ·
2023 season
Agreement Signals — When All Metrics Agree
Elite · 83.1% ATS
PPA + PPO + SR + Havoc
All 4 Agree
→ Florida State
Elite · 82.4% ATS
PPA + PPO + Havoc
3 Agree
→ Florida State
Elite · 73.9% ATS
PPA + Success Rate
Both Agree
→ Florida State
Individual Factors — Ranked by Predictive Strength
PPA Overall
Points added per play · Elite predictor
PPA Passing
Pass efficiency edge · Strong predictor
Havoc Total
Def. disruption rate · Strong predictor
TFLs, sacks, PBUs, forced fumbles — higher is better
Points Per Opp
Drive-finishing edge · Strong predictor
Success Rate
Play consistency edge · Solid predictor
Field Position
Avg start (lower=better) · Solid predictor
Avg yards from own endzone to average start — lower is better · longer bar = better field position
Advanced stats sourced from CFBD · 2023 season ·
Edges are matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense)
Power Ratings
Team Power Ratings
Overall · Offense · Defense ratings · Updated as season progresses
Power ratings updated throughout the season as results accumulate
Momentum Control (CSS)
Consecutive Scoring Sequences
Who builds scoring momentum?
Florida State Edge
Florida State +4.00
CSS Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 80.6% of games historically
Based on 1 game this season
Game Control (GC)
Win Probability Dominance
Who controls games start to finish?
Florida State Edge
Florida State +17.6
GC Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 64.9% of games historically
Based on 2 games this season
Spread Context
ATS Historical Context
Based on 2021–2025 backtest · FBS vs FBS · Regular season
Both metrics agree on Florida State with a solid GC edge. Teams with this profile have covered 53.0% of the time historically (n=330) — a mild lean.
ATS data is informational only. Past cover rates do not guarantee future results.
Coaching Matchup
Florida State
Mike Norvell #1
21–16 (57%)
· Yr 4 at school
OC
Alex Atkins
Yr 2
#1
DC
Adam Fuller
Yr 3
#1
Boston College
Jeff Hafley #1
16–22 (42%)
· Yr 4 at school
OC
Steve Shimko
Yr 1
#1
DC
Aazaar Abdul-Rahim
Yr 1
#1
About these metrics
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games. ✓
Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: CSS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: GS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself ✓
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games. ✓
Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: CSS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: GS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself ✓