Matchup Prediction
Liberty
has the edge in this matchup
Both Momentum Control (CSS) and Game Control metrics favor
Liberty entering this game.
Momentum Control
73.7%
Liberty wins
Solid
Game Control
75.9%
Liberty wins
Solid
Vegas Spread
Liberty -18.0
O/U 54.5
Bovada
Advanced Stats
All 4 factors agree → Liberty
· 83.1% ATS historically when all four align
↓ See full breakdown
Liberty 2023 Schedule
Liberty's 2023 Schedule
| Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 9/2 | Liberty vs Bowling Green | -8.5W34–24 | 48.5 | W34–24 | O | Y |
| Sat 9/9 | Liberty vs New Mexico State | -9.0W33–17 | 54.5 | W33–17 | U | Y |
| Sat 9/16 | Liberty at Buffalo | -2.5W55–27 | 54.0 | W55–27 | O | Y |
| Sat 9/23 | Liberty at Florida International | -10.0W38–6 | 54.0 | W38–6 | U | Y |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Thu 10/5 | Liberty vs Sam Houston | -21.0W21–16 | 46.5 | W21–16 | U | N |
| Tue 10/10 | Liberty at Jacksonville State | -7.0W31–13 | 59.5 | W31–13 | U | Y |
| Tue 10/17 | Liberty vs Middle Tennessee | -16.0W42–35 | 56.5 | W42–35 | O | N |
| Tue 10/24 | Liberty at Western Kentucky | -4.0W42–29 | 61.5 | W42–29 | O | Y |
| Sat 11/4 | Liberty vs Louisiana Tech | -16.5W56–30 | 58.0 | W56–30 | O | Y |
| Sat 11/11 | Liberty vs Old Dominion | -13.5W38–10 | 58.5 | W38–10 | U | Y |
| Sat 11/18 | Liberty vs Massachusetts | -26.5W49–25 | 64.5 | W49–25 | O | N |
| Sat 11/25 | Liberty at UTEP | -18.0W42–28 | 54.5 | W42–28 | O | N |
| Fri 12/1 | Liberty vs New Mexico State | -10.5W49–35 | 54.0 | W49–35 | O | Y |
| Mon 1/1 | Liberty vs Oregon | +18.5L6–45 | 71.5 | L6–45 | U | N |
UTEP 2023 Schedule
UTEP's 2023 Schedule
| Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 8/26 | UTEP at Jacksonville State | -1.5L14–17 | 54.5 | L14–17 | U | N |
| Sat 9/2 | UTEP vs Incarnate Word | -7.5W28–14 | 57.5 | W28–14 | U | Y |
| Sat 9/9 | UTEP at Northwestern | +1.0L7–38 | 40.0 | L7–38 | O | N |
| Sat 9/16 | UTEP at Arizona | +18.0L10–31 | 57.0 | L10–31 | U | N |
| Sat 9/23 | UTEP vs UNLV | -1.0L28–45 | 49.5 | L28–45 | O | N |
| Fri 9/29 | UTEP vs Louisiana Tech | +2.0L10–24 | 49.5 | L10–24 | U | N |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Wed 10/11 | UTEP at Florida International | -1.5W27–14 | 44.0 | W27–14 | U | Y |
| Wed 10/18 | UTEP vs New Mexico State | +3.0L7–28 | 48.5 | L7–28 | U | N |
| Wed 10/25 | UTEP at Sam Houston | +4.0W37–34 | 38.5 | W37–34 | O | Y |
| Sat 11/4 | UTEP vs Western Kentucky | +9.5L13–21 | 54.5 | L13–21 | U | Y |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Sat 11/18 | UTEP at Middle Tennessee | +8.5L30–34 | 48.5 | L30–34 | O | Y |
| Sat 11/25 | UTEP vs Liberty | +18.0L28–42 | 54.5 | L28–42 | O | Y |
Advanced Stats
Advanced Analytics Matchup
Matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense) ·
2023 season
Agreement Signals — When All Metrics Agree
Elite · 83.1% ATS
PPA + PPO + SR + Havoc
All 4 Agree
→ Liberty
Elite · 82.4% ATS
PPA + PPO + Havoc
3 Agree
→ Liberty
Elite · 73.9% ATS
PPA + Success Rate
Both Agree
→ Liberty
Individual Factors — Ranked by Predictive Strength
PPA Overall
Points added per play · Elite predictor
PPA Passing
Pass efficiency edge · Strong predictor
Havoc Total
Def. disruption rate · Strong predictor
TFLs, sacks, PBUs, forced fumbles — higher is better
Points Per Opp
Drive-finishing edge · Strong predictor
Success Rate
Play consistency edge · Solid predictor
Field Position
Avg start (lower=better) · Solid predictor
Avg yards from own endzone to average start — lower is better · longer bar = better field position
Advanced stats sourced from CFBD · 2023 season ·
Edges are matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense)
Power Ratings
Team Power Ratings
Overall · Offense · Defense ratings · Updated as season progresses
Power ratings updated throughout the season as results accumulate
Momentum Control (CSS)
Consecutive Scoring Sequences
Who builds scoring momentum?
Liberty Edge
Liberty +1.42
CSS Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 73.7% of games historically
Based on 10 games this season
Game Control (GC)
Win Probability Dominance
Who controls games start to finish?
Liberty Edge
Liberty +45.7
GC Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 75.9% of games historically
Based on 11 games this season
Actual Result
CSS Battle
Tie
1 — 1 sequences
✗ Predicted incorrectly
GC Battle
Liberty
4.5 — 88.5 GC score
✓ Predicted correctly
Game Result
Liberty won by 14
✓ Model called it
Spread Context
ATS Historical Context
Based on 2021–2025 backtest · FBS vs FBS · Regular season
Both metrics agree on Liberty with a large edge. Historically, dominant teams like this are fully priced into the spread — the agreed-upon team covers just 50.2% of the time. The metrics predict game control better than they beat the number.
ATS data is informational only. Past cover rates do not guarantee future results.
Coaching Matchup
Liberty
Jamey Chadwell #1
3–0 (100%)
· Yr 1 at school
OC
Newland Isaac
Yr 1
#1
DC
Jack Curtis
Yr 1
#1
UTEP
Dana Dimel #1
18–43 (30%)
· Yr 6 at school
OC
Scotty Ohara
Yr 1
#1
DC
Bradley Dale Peveto
Yr 3
#1
About these metrics
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games. ✓
Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: CSS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: GS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself ✓
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games. ✓
Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: CSS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: GS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself ✓