Air Force at Nevada Week 12 College Football Matchup Air Force at Nevada Matchup - Week 12
Sat, Nov 20 2021 · Week 12 · 🏟 Mackay Stadium Reno, NV · Turf · 26,000 cap
Air Force✈ 800 mi-1 hr TZ
41 39
Final
Home
📊 Punt & Rally Projection
Air Force
29
Nevada
27
P&R Line Air Force -1.5
P&R Total O/U 55.5
Confidence 90 High
Vegas Air Force -1.5 · O/U 53.5
Matchup Prediction
Toss-up — no clear edge
Neither metric shows a meaningful pre-game edge in this matchup.
Momentum Control
58.4%
Lean
Game Control
64.9%
Air Force wins
Lean
Vegas Spread
Air Force -1.5
O/U 53.5
teamrankings
Advanced Stats
All 4 factors agree → Air Force · 83.1% ATS historically when all four align
↓ See full breakdown
🚌 Air Force 2nd straight Road Game
Air Force 2021 Schedule
Air Force's 2021 Schedule
DateMatchupSpreadTotalResultO/UCover
Sat 9/4Air Force vs Lafayette-40.5W35–1449.5W35–14UN
Sat 9/11Air Force at Navy-6.0W23–340.0W23–3UY
Sat 9/18Air Force vs Utah State-9.0L45–4954.0L45–49ON
Sat 9/25Air Force vs Florida Atlantic-3.5W31–754.0W31–7UY
Sat 10/2Air Force at New Mexico-11.5W38–1046.0W38–10OY
Sat 10/9Air Force vs Wyoming-5.5W24–1446.5W24–14UY
Sat 10/16Air Force at Boise State+3.0W24–1752.0W24–17UY
Sat 10/23Air Force vs San Diego State-3.0L14–2038.5L14–20UN
— Bye Week —
Sat 11/6Air Force vs Army-2.5L14–2137.5L14–21UN
Sat 11/13Air Force at Colorado State-3.0W35–2145.0W35–21OY
Fri 11/19Air Force at Nevada-1.5W41–3953.5W41–39OY
Fri 11/26Air Force vs UNLV-18.5W48–1449.5W48–14OY
Tue 12/28Air Force vs Louisville-1.0W31–2855.0W31–28OY
Nevada 2021 Schedule
Nevada's 2021 Schedule
DateMatchupSpreadTotalResultO/UCover
Sat 9/4Nevada at California+2.5W22–1752.5W22–17UY
Sat 9/11Nevada vs Idaho State-35.0W49–1056.5W49–10OY
Sat 9/18Nevada at Kansas State-1.5L17–3851.5L17–38ON
— Bye Week —
Sat 10/2Nevada at Boise State+3.5W41–3159.0W41–31OY
Sat 10/9Nevada vs New Mexico State-28.5W55–2864.5W55–28ON
Sat 10/16Nevada vs Hawai'i-14.0W34–1761.5W34–17UY
Sat 10/23Nevada at Fresno State+3.5L32–3464.5L32–34OY
Fri 10/29Nevada vs UNLV-19.0W51–2058.0W51–20OY
Sat 11/6Nevada vs San José State-11.5W27–2455.5W27–24UN
Sat 11/13Nevada at San Diego State+2.5L21–2345.0L21–23UY
Fri 11/19Nevada vs Air Force+1.5L39–4153.5L39–41ON
Sat 11/27Nevada at Colorado State-3.0W52–1057.5W52–10OY
Mon 12/27Nevada vs Western Michigan+7.0L24–5256.0L24–52ON
Advanced Stats
Advanced Analytics Matchup
Matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense) · 2021 season
Air Force PPA Edge
Agreement Signals — When All Metrics Agree
Elite · 83.1% ATS
PPA + PPO + SR + Havoc
All 4 Agree
→ Air Force
Elite · 82.4% ATS
PPA + PPO + Havoc
3 Agree
→ Air Force
Elite · 73.9% ATS
PPA + Success Rate
Both Agree
→ Air Force
Individual Factors — Ranked by Predictive Strength
PPA Overall
Points added per play · Elite predictor
Air Force
+0.492
Nevada
+0.447
Air Force Edge
PPA Passing
Pass efficiency edge · Strong predictor
Air Force
+0.706
Nevada
+0.620
Air Force Edge
Havoc Total
Def. disruption rate · Strong predictor
Air Force
0.201
Nevada
0.180
TFLs, sacks, PBUs, forced fumbles — higher is better
Air Force Edge
Points Per Opp
Drive-finishing edge · Strong predictor
Air Force
+8.072
Nevada
+7.653
Air Force Edge
Success Rate
Play consistency edge · Solid predictor
Air Force
+0.917
Nevada
+0.805
Air Force Edge
Field Position
Avg start (lower=better) · Solid predictor
Air Force
69.8
Nevada
68.8
Avg yards from own endzone to average start — lower is better · longer bar = better field position
Nevada Edge
Advanced stats sourced from CFBD · 2021 season · Edges are matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense)
Power Ratings
Team Power Ratings
Overall · Offense · Defense ratings · Updated as season progresses
Air Force Rated Higher
Overall Power Rating
Air Force
-8.3
Nevada
-21.6
Offense Rating
Air Force
8.5
Nevada
4.5
Defense Rating (lower = better defense)
Air Force
16.9
Nevada
26.1
Power ratings updated throughout the season as results accumulate
Momentum Control (CSS)
Consecutive Scoring Sequences Who builds scoring momentum?
Avg sequences created per game
Air Force #25
1.33
Nevada #48
1.33
Avg sequences allowed per game (lower is better)
Air Force #20
0.67
Nevada #75
0.89
Air Force +0.00
CSS Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 58.4% of games historically
Based on 9 games this season
Game Control (GC)
Win Probability Dominance Who controls games start to finish? Air Force Edge
Avg GC score per game (offense)
Air Force #1
69.1
Nevada #1
57.3
Avg GC score allowed per game (lower is better)
Air Force #8
19.6
Nevada #47
28.2
Air Force +11.8
GC Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 64.9% of games historically
Based on 10 games this season
Actual Result
CSS Battle
Tie
1 — 1 sequences
GC Battle
Air Force
12.2 — 66.4 GC score
✓ Predicted correctly
Game Result
Air Force won by 2
Spread Context
ATS Historical Context
Based on 2021–2025 backtest · FBS vs FBS · Regular season

CSS and GC disagree on this matchup. When the metrics split, historical cover rates are essentially random — treat this as a coin flip against the spread.

ATS data is informational only. Past cover rates do not guarantee future results.

Coaching Matchup
Air Force
Troy Calhoun #1
104–73 (59%) · Yr 15 at school
OC Mike Thiessen Yr 1 #1
DC John Rudzinski Yr 1 #1
Staff Rating
0.00 #1
Nevada
Jay Norvell #1
27–23 (54%) · Yr 5 at school
OC Matt Mumme Yr 1 #1
DC Brian Ward Yr 1 #1
Staff Rating
0.00 #1
About these metrics
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games.

Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: Momentum Control is a great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set.

Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: Game Control is another great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set.

Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself