Nevada at California Week 1 College Football Matchup Nevada at California Matchup - Week 1
Sun, Sep 5 2021 · Week 1 · 🏟 California Memorial Stadium Berkeley, CA · Turf · 62,717 cap
Nevada✈ 174 miSame TZ
Away
22 17
Final
Home
📊 Punt & Rally Projection
Nevada
26
California
28
P&R Line California -2.5
P&R Total O/U 53.5
Confidence 86 High
Vegas California -2.5 · O/U 52.5
Matchup Prediction
Toss-up — no clear edge
Neither metric shows a meaningful pre-game edge in this matchup.
Momentum Control
58.4%
Lean
Game Control
50.6%
Toss-up
Vegas Spread
California -2.5
O/U 52.5
teamrankings
Advanced Stats
PPA + Success Rate agree → California · 73.9% ATS historically
↓ See full breakdown
Nevada 2021 Schedule
Nevada's 2021 Schedule
DateMatchupSpreadTotalResultO/UCover
Sat 9/4Nevada at California+2.5W22–1752.5W22–17UY
Sat 9/11Nevada vs Idaho State-35.0W49–1056.5W49–10OY
Sat 9/18Nevada at Kansas State-1.5L17–3851.5L17–38ON
— Bye Week —
Sat 10/2Nevada at Boise State+3.5W41–3159.0W41–31OY
Sat 10/9Nevada vs New Mexico State-28.5W55–2864.5W55–28ON
Sat 10/16Nevada vs Hawai'i-14.0W34–1761.5W34–17UY
Sat 10/23Nevada at Fresno State+3.5L32–3464.5L32–34OY
Fri 10/29Nevada vs UNLV-19.0W51–2058.0W51–20OY
Sat 11/6Nevada vs San José State-11.5W27–2455.5W27–24UN
Sat 11/13Nevada at San Diego State+2.5L21–2345.0L21–23UY
Fri 11/19Nevada vs Air Force+1.5L39–4153.5L39–41ON
Sat 11/27Nevada at Colorado State-3.0W52–1057.5W52–10OY
Mon 12/27Nevada vs Western Michigan+7.0L24–5256.0L24–52ON
California 2021 Schedule
California's 2021 Schedule
DateMatchupSpreadTotalResultO/UCover
Sat 9/4California vs Nevada-2.5L17–2252.5L17–22UN
Sat 9/11California at TCU+11.5L32–3446.5L32–34OY
Sat 9/18California vs Sacramento State-24.5W42–3049.0W42–30ON
Sat 9/25California at Washington+7.5L24–3147.5L24–31OY
Sat 10/2California vs Washington State-7.5L6–2152.5L6–21UN
— Bye Week —
Fri 10/15California at Oregon+13.5L17–2453.5L17–24UY
Sat 10/23California vs Colorado-8.0W26–344.0W26–3UY
Sat 10/30California vs Oregon State+2.5W39–2556.5W39–25OY
Sat 11/6California at Arizona-7.0L3–1047.0L3–10UN
Sat 11/13California vs USC+2.052.5
Sat 11/20California at Stanford-2.5W41–1146.0W41–11OY
Sat 11/27California at UCLA+6.5L14–4258.5L14–42UN
Sat 12/4California vs USC-4.5W24–1457.5W24–14UY
Advanced Stats
Advanced Analytics Matchup
Matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense) · 2021 season
California PPA Edge
Agreement Signals — When All Metrics Agree
Elite · 83.1% ATS
PPA + PPO + SR + Havoc
Split
Metrics disagree
Elite · 82.4% ATS
PPA + PPO + Havoc
Split
Metrics disagree
Elite · 73.9% ATS
PPA + Success Rate
Both Agree
→ California
Individual Factors — Ranked by Predictive Strength
PPA Overall
Points added per play · Elite predictor
Nevada
+0.433
California
+0.442
California Edge
PPA Passing
Pass efficiency edge · Strong predictor
Nevada
+0.613
California
+0.409
Nevada Edge
Havoc Total
Def. disruption rate · Strong predictor
Nevada
0.180
California
0.162
TFLs, sacks, PBUs, forced fumbles — higher is better
Nevada Edge
Points Per Opp
Drive-finishing edge · Strong predictor
Nevada
+7.025
California
+7.375
California Edge
Success Rate
Play consistency edge · Solid predictor
Nevada
+0.863
California
+0.901
California Edge
Field Position
Avg start (lower=better) · Solid predictor
Nevada
68.8
California
73.7
Avg yards from own endzone to average start — lower is better · longer bar = better field position
Nevada Edge
Advanced stats sourced from CFBD · 2021 season · Edges are matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense)
Power Ratings
Team Power Ratings
Overall · Offense · Defense ratings · Updated as season progresses
California Rated Higher
Overall Power Rating
Nevada
-21.6
California
5.3
Offense Rating
Nevada
4.5
California
19.2
Defense Rating (lower = better defense)
Nevada
26.1
California
14.0
Power ratings updated throughout the season as results accumulate
Momentum Control (CSS)
Consecutive Scoring Sequences Who builds scoring momentum? Nevada Edge
Avg sequences created per game
Nevada #48
0.00
California #88
0.00
Avg sequences allowed per game (lower is better)
Nevada #75
0.00
California #43
0.00
Nevada +0.00
CSS Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 58.4% of games historically
Based on 0 games this season
Game Control (GC)
Win Probability Dominance Who controls games start to finish? Nevada Edge
Avg GC score per game (offense)
Nevada #1
0.0
California #1
0.0
Avg GC score allowed per game (lower is better)
Nevada #47
0.0
California #60
0.0
Nevada +0.0
GC Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 50.6% of games historically
Based on 0 games this season
Actual Result
CSS Battle
Tie
1 — 1 sequences
✗ Predicted incorrectly
GC Battle
Nevada
38.7 — 48.3 GC score
✗ Predicted incorrectly
Game Result
Nevada won by 5
Spread Context
ATS Historical Context
Based on 2021–2025 backtest · FBS vs FBS · Regular season

Both metrics agree on California, but the GC edge is small. When metrics agree but GC is near-neutral, the agreed-upon team has covered only 46.7% of the time historically (n=224) — potentially a fade signal.

ATS data is informational only. Past cover rates do not guarantee future results.

Coaching Matchup
Nevada
Jay Norvell #1
27–23 (54%) · Yr 5 at school
OC Matt Mumme Yr 1 #1
DC Brian Ward Yr 1 #1
Staff Rating
0.00 #1
California
Justin Wilcox #1
22–23 (49%) · Yr 5 at school
OC Bill Musgrave Yr 1 #1
DC Peter Sirmon Yr 1 #1
Staff Rating
0.00 #1
About these metrics
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games.

Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: Momentum Control is a great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set.

Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: Game Control is another great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set.

Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself