Kent State at Ohio Week 8 College Football Matchup Kent State at Ohio Matchup - Week 8
Sat, Oct 23 2021 · Week 8 · 🏟 Peden Stadium Athens, OH · Turf · 24,000 cap
Kent State✈ 132 miSame TZ
34 27
Final
Home
📊 Punt & Rally Projection
Kent State
33
Ohio
31
P&R Line Kent State -2.5
P&R Total O/U 64
Confidence 86 High
Vegas Kent State -5 · O/U 68.5
Matchup Prediction
Metrics disagree on this matchup
Momentum Control favors Ohio, while Game Control favors Kent State. Split signals historically show weaker predictive confidence — treat as a toss-up.
⚡ Split Signal — Metrics Disagree
Momentum Control
58.4%
Ohio wins
Lean
Game Control
58.3%
Kent State wins
Lean
Vegas Spread
Kent State -5
O/U 68.5
teamrankings
Advanced Stats
PPA + Success Rate agree → Kent State · 73.9% ATS historically
↓ See full breakdown
🚌 Kent State 2nd straight Road Game
Kent State 2021 Schedule
Kent State's 2021 Schedule
DateMatchupSpreadTotalResultO/UCover
Sat 9/4Kent State at Texas A&M+29.5L10–4167.0L10–41UN
Sat 9/11Kent State vs VMI-19.0W60–1073.0W60–10UY
Sat 9/18Kent State at Iowa+22.0L7–3055.5L7–30UN
Sat 9/25Kent State at Maryland+13.0L16–3771.5L16–37UN
Sat 10/2Kent State vs Bowling Green-16.5W27–2056.0W27–20UN
Sat 10/9Kent State vs Buffalo-7.0W48–3866.0W48–38OY
Sat 10/16Kent State at Western Michigan+7.0L31–6468.5L31–64ON
Sat 10/23Kent State at Ohio-5.0W34–2768.5W34–27UY
— Bye Week —
Wed 11/3Kent State vs Northern Illinois-3.5W52–4772.0W52–47OY
Wed 11/10Kent State at Central Michigan+2.5L30–5476.5L30–54ON
Sat 11/20Kent State at Akron-13.5W38–072.5W38–0UY
Sat 11/27Kent State vs Miami (OH)+1.0W48–4768.0W48–47OY
Sat 12/4Kent State vs Northern Illinois-3.5L23–4175.5L23–41UN
Tue 12/21Kent State vs Wyoming+3.0L38–5261.0L38–52ON
Ohio 2021 Schedule
Ohio's 2021 Schedule
DateMatchupSpreadTotalResultO/UCover
Sat 9/4Ohio vs Syracuse-2.0L9–2955.5L9–29UN
Sat 9/11Ohio vs Duquesne-28.5L26–2849.0L26–28ON
Thu 9/16Ohio at Louisiana+18.5L14–4956.5L14–49ON
Sat 9/25Ohio at Northwestern+13.5L6–3547.5L6–35UN
Sat 10/2Ohio at Akron-10.0W34–1755.0W34–17UY
Sat 10/9Ohio vs Central Michigan+5.0L27–3058.0L27–30UY
Sat 10/16Ohio at Buffalo+7.5L26–2754.5L26–27UY
Sat 10/23Ohio vs Kent State+5.0L27–3468.5L27–34UN
— Bye Week —
Tue 11/2Ohio vs Miami (OH)+7.0W35–3354.5W35–33OY
Tue 11/9Ohio at Eastern Michigan+6.0W34–2661.5W34–26UY
Tue 11/16Ohio vs Toledo+7.5L23–3557.5L23–35ON
Fri 11/26Ohio at Bowling Green-6.0L10–2148.0L10–21UN
Advanced Stats
Advanced Analytics Matchup
Matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense) · 2021 season
Kent State PPA Edge
Agreement Signals — When All Metrics Agree
Elite · 83.1% ATS
PPA + PPO + SR + Havoc
Split
Metrics disagree
Elite · 82.4% ATS
PPA + PPO + Havoc
Split
Metrics disagree
Elite · 73.9% ATS
PPA + Success Rate
Both Agree
→ Kent State
Individual Factors — Ranked by Predictive Strength
PPA Overall
Points added per play · Elite predictor
Kent State
+0.564
Ohio
+0.520
Kent State Edge
PPA Passing
Pass efficiency edge · Strong predictor
Kent State
+0.614
Ohio
+0.543
Kent State Edge
Havoc Total
Def. disruption rate · Strong predictor
Kent State
0.153
Ohio
0.122
TFLs, sacks, PBUs, forced fumbles — higher is better
Kent State Edge
Points Per Opp
Drive-finishing edge · Strong predictor
Kent State
+7.610
Ohio
+8.284
Ohio Edge
Success Rate
Play consistency edge · Solid predictor
Kent State
+0.973
Ohio
+0.935
Kent State Edge
Field Position
Avg start (lower=better) · Solid predictor
Kent State
70.6
Ohio
71.0
Avg yards from own endzone to average start — lower is better · longer bar = better field position
Kent State Edge
Advanced stats sourced from CFBD · 2021 season · Edges are matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense)
Power Ratings
Team Power Ratings
Overall · Offense · Defense ratings · Updated as season progresses
Ohio Rated Higher
Overall Power Rating
Kent State
-16.7
Ohio
-10.4
Offense Rating
Kent State
7.5
Ohio
7.5
Defense Rating (lower = better defense)
Kent State
24.2
Ohio
17.8
Power ratings updated throughout the season as results accumulate
Momentum Control (CSS)
Consecutive Scoring Sequences Who builds scoring momentum? Ohio Edge
Avg sequences created per game
Kent State #61
0.33
Ohio #76
0.83
Avg sequences allowed per game (lower is better)
Kent State #106
1.67
Ohio #101
1.83
Ohio +0.50
CSS Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 58.4% of games historically
Based on 6 games this season
Game Control (GC)
Win Probability Dominance Who controls games start to finish? Kent State Edge
Avg GC score per game (offense)
Kent State #1
38.1
Ohio #1
33.5
Avg GC score allowed per game (lower is better)
Kent State #80
55.9
Ohio #93
53.9
Kent State +4.5
GC Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 58.3% of games historically
Based on 7 games this season
Actual Result
CSS Battle
Tie
1 — 1 sequences
✗ Predicted incorrectly
GC Battle
Kent State
3.6 — 93.7 GC score
✓ Predicted correctly
Game Result
Kent State won by 7
Spread Context
ATS Historical Context
Based on 2021–2025 backtest · FBS vs FBS · Regular season

CSS and GC disagree on this matchup. When the metrics split, historical cover rates are essentially random — treat this as a coin flip against the spread.

ATS data is informational only. Past cover rates do not guarantee future results.

Coaching Matchup
Kent State
Sean Lewis #1
13–19 (41%) · Yr 4 at school
OC Andrew Sowder Yr 1 #1
DC Tom Kaufman Yr 1 #1
Staff Rating
0.00 #1
Ohio
Tim Albin #1
0–3 (0%) · Yr 1 at school
OC Scott Ishpording Yr 1 #1
DC Pete Germano Yr 1 #1
Staff Rating
0.00 #1
About these metrics
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games.

Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: CSS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set.

Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: GS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set.

Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself