Sat, Sep 11 2021
·
Week 2
·
🏟 Huntington Bank Stadium
Minneapolis, MN
·
Turf
·
50,805 cap
Miami (OH)✈ 574 mi-1 hr TZ
Matchup Prediction
Minnesota
has the edge in this matchup
Both Momentum Control (CSS) and Game Control metrics favor
Minnesota entering this game.
Momentum Control
71.6%
Minnesota wins
Solid
Game Control
58.6%
Minnesota wins
Lean
Vegas Spread
Minnesota -18.5
O/U 55.0
teamrankings
Advanced Stats
PPA + Success Rate agree → Minnesota
· 73.9% ATS historically
↓ See full breakdown
Miami (OH) 2021 Schedule
Miami (OH)'s 2021 Schedule
| Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 9/4 | Miami (OH) at Cincinnati | +22.5L14–49 | 49.0 | L14–49 | O | N |
| Sat 9/11 | Miami (OH) at Minnesota | +18.5L26–31 | 55.0 | L26–31 | O | Y |
| Sat 9/18 | Miami (OH) vs Long Island University | -39.5W42–7 | 55.5 | W42–7 | U | N |
| Sat 9/25 | Miami (OH) at Army | +7.5L10–23 | 49.0 | L10–23 | U | N |
| Sat 10/2 | Miami (OH) vs Central Michigan | +2.5W28–17 | 56.5 | W28–17 | U | Y |
| Sat 10/9 | Miami (OH) at Eastern Michigan | -2.5L12–13 | 58.0 | L12–13 | U | N |
| Sat 10/16 | Miami (OH) vs Akron | -20.0W34–21 | 51.0 | W34–21 | O | N |
| Sat 10/23 | Miami (OH) at Ball State | +3.5W24–17 | 53.0 | W24–17 | U | Y |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Tue 11/2 | Miami (OH) at Ohio | -7.0L33–35 | 54.5 | L33–35 | O | N |
| Tue 11/9 | Miami (OH) vs Buffalo | -7.0W45–18 | 58.0 | W45–18 | O | Y |
| Tue 11/16 | Miami (OH) vs Bowling Green | -17.0W34–7 | 52.0 | W34–7 | U | Y |
| Sat 11/27 | Miami (OH) at Kent State | -1.0L47–48 | 68.0 | L47–48 | O | N |
| Thu 12/23 | Miami (OH) vs North Texas | -2.0W27–14 | 56.5 | W27–14 | U | Y |
Minnesota 2021 Schedule
Minnesota's 2021 Schedule
| Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 9/2 | Minnesota vs Ohio State | +14.0L31–45 | 62.0 | L31–45 | O | Y |
| Sat 9/11 | Minnesota vs Miami (OH) | -18.5W31–26 | 55.0 | W31–26 | O | N |
| Sat 9/18 | Minnesota at Colorado | +2.5W30–0 | 49.0 | W30–0 | U | Y |
| Sat 9/25 | Minnesota vs Bowling Green | -30.5L10–14 | 52.5 | L10–14 | U | N |
| Sat 10/2 | Minnesota at Purdue | +2.0W20–13 | 46.0 | W20–13 | U | Y |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Sat 10/16 | Minnesota vs Nebraska | +4.5W30–23 | 48.5 | W30–23 | O | Y |
| Sat 10/23 | Minnesota vs Maryland | -4.0W34–16 | 53.0 | W34–16 | U | Y |
| Sat 10/30 | Minnesota at Northwestern | -7.5W41–14 | 43.5 | W41–14 | O | Y |
| Sat 11/6 | Minnesota vs Illinois | -14.5L6–14 | 44.5 | L6–14 | U | N |
| Sat 11/13 | Minnesota at Iowa | +4.0L22–27 | 37.5 | L22–27 | O | N |
| Sat 11/20 | Minnesota at Indiana | -7.5W35–14 | 43.0 | W35–14 | O | Y |
| Sat 11/27 | Minnesota vs Wisconsin | +7.0W23–13 | 39.0 | W23–13 | U | Y |
| Tue 12/28 | Minnesota vs West Virginia | -5.0W18–6 | 44.5 | W18–6 | U | Y |
Advanced Stats
Advanced Analytics Matchup
Matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense) ·
2021 season
Agreement Signals — When All Metrics Agree
Elite · 83.1% ATS
PPA + PPO + SR + Havoc
Split
Metrics disagree
Elite · 82.4% ATS
PPA + PPO + Havoc
Split
Metrics disagree
Elite · 73.9% ATS
PPA + Success Rate
Both Agree
→ Minnesota
Individual Factors — Ranked by Predictive Strength
PPA Overall
Points added per play · Elite predictor
PPA Passing
Pass efficiency edge · Strong predictor
Havoc Total
Def. disruption rate · Strong predictor
TFLs, sacks, PBUs, forced fumbles — higher is better
Points Per Opp
Drive-finishing edge · Strong predictor
Success Rate
Play consistency edge · Solid predictor
Field Position
Avg start (lower=better) · Solid predictor
Avg yards from own endzone to average start — lower is better · longer bar = better field position
Advanced stats sourced from CFBD · 2021 season ·
Edges are matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense)
Power Ratings
Team Power Ratings
Overall · Offense · Defense ratings · Updated as season progresses
Power ratings updated throughout the season as results accumulate
Momentum Control (CSS)
Consecutive Scoring Sequences
Who builds scoring momentum?
Minnesota Edge
Minnesota +1.00
CSS Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 71.6% of games historically
Based on 1 game this season
Game Control (GC)
Win Probability Dominance
Who controls games start to finish?
Minnesota Edge
Minnesota +10.9
GC Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 58.6% of games historically
Based on 1 game this season
Actual Result
CSS Battle
Tie
2 — 2 sequences
✗ Predicted incorrectly
GC Battle
Minnesota
95.6 — 2.9 GC score
✓ Predicted correctly
Game Result
Minnesota won by 5
✓ Model called it
Spread Context
ATS Historical Context
Based on 2021–2025 backtest · FBS vs FBS · Regular season
Both metrics agree on Minnesota. Teams with this edge profile have covered 50.3% historically — essentially a coin flip against the spread.
ATS data is informational only. Past cover rates do not guarantee future results.
Coaching Matchup
Miami (OH)
Chuck Martin #1
33–48 (41%)
· Yr 8 at school
OC
Eric Koehler
Yr 1
#1
DC
Spence Nowinsky
Yr 1
#1
Minnesota
P. J. Fleck #1
28–20 (58%)
· Yr 5 at school
OC
Mike Sanford Jr.
Yr 1
#1
DC
Joe Rossi
Yr 1
#1
About these metrics
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games. ✓
Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: CSS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: GS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself ✓
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games. ✓
Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: CSS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: GS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself ✓