Florida at Georgia Week 9 College Football Matchup Florida at Georgia Matchup - Week 9
Sat, Oct 31 2026 · Week 9 · 🏟 Mercedes-Benz Stadium Atlanta, GA · Turf · 71,000 cap
Florida✈ 308 miSame TZ
Away
VS
Home
Preseason projection — This game has not yet been played and 2026 in-season data is not yet available. Edges are based on 2025 full-season performance. Confidence will increase once in-season games are logged.
📊 Punt & Rally Projection
Florida
13
Georgia
35
P&R Line Georgia -22
P&R Total O/U 47
Confidence 69 Good
Matchup Prediction
Georgia has the edge in this matchup
Both Momentum Control (CSS) and Game Control metrics favor Georgia entering this game.
Momentum Control
58.4%
Georgia wins
Lean
Game Control
67.1%
Georgia wins
Solid
Advanced Stats
All 4 factors agree → Georgia · 83.1% ATS historically when all four align
↓ See full breakdown
🛋 Georgia Coming off BYE 🛋 Florida Coming off BYE
Florida 2026 Schedule
Florida's 2026 Schedule
DateMatchupSpreadTotalResultO/UCover
Sat 9/5Florida vs Florida Atlantic-17
Sat 9/12Florida vs Campbell-29
Sat 9/19Florida at Auburn+4
Sat 9/26Florida vs Ole Miss+8
Sat 10/3Florida at Missouri+9
Sat 10/10Florida vs South Carolina-4
Sat 10/17Florida at Texas+22
— Bye Week —
Sat 10/31Florida at Georgia+22
Sat 11/7Florida vs Oklahoma+9
Sat 11/14Florida at Kentucky-3.5
Sat 11/21Florida vs Vanderbilt-2.5
Fri 11/27Florida at Florida State+2.5
Georgia 2026 Schedule
Georgia's 2026 Schedule
DateMatchupSpreadTotalResultO/UCover
Sat 9/5Georgia vs Tennessee State-37
Sat 9/12Georgia vs Western Kentucky-29
Sat 9/19Georgia at Arkansas-22.5
Sat 9/26Georgia vs Oklahoma-10
Sat 10/3Georgia vs Vanderbilt-22
Sat 10/10Georgia at Alabama-8
Sat 10/17Georgia vs Auburn-20
— Bye Week —
Sat 10/31Georgia vs Florida-22
Sat 11/7Georgia at Ole Miss-6
Sat 11/14Georgia vs Missouri-15.5
Sat 11/21Georgia at South Carolina-18
Sat 11/28Georgia vs Georgia Tech-23.5
Advanced Stats
Advanced Analytics Matchup
Matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense) · 2025 season (prior year)
Georgia PPA Edge
Agreement Signals — When All Metrics Agree
Elite · 83.1% ATS
PPA + PPO + SR + Havoc
All 4 Agree
→ Georgia
Elite · 82.4% ATS
PPA + PPO + Havoc
3 Agree
→ Georgia
Elite · 73.9% ATS
PPA + Success Rate
Both Agree
→ Georgia
Individual Factors — Ranked by Predictive Strength
PPA Overall
Points added per play · Elite predictor
Florida #87
+0.236
Georgia #23
+0.443
Georgia Edge
PPA Passing
Pass efficiency edge · Strong predictor
Florida #110
+0.400
Georgia #34
+0.667
Georgia Edge
Havoc Total
Def. disruption rate · Strong predictor
Florida #98
0.145
Georgia #80
0.151
TFLs, sacks, PBUs, forced fumbles — higher is better
Georgia Edge
Points Per Opp
Drive-finishing edge · Strong predictor
Florida #41
+7.672
Georgia #7
+8.251
Georgia Edge
Success Rate
Play consistency edge · Solid predictor
Florida #83
+0.807
Georgia #14
+0.911
Georgia Edge
Field Position
Avg start (lower=better) · Solid predictor
Florida #106
72.3
Georgia #62
70.7
Avg yards from own endzone to average start — lower is better · longer bar = better field position
Georgia Edge
Advanced stats sourced from CFBD · 2025 season (prior year — 2026 data not yet available) · Edges are matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense)
Power Ratings
Team Power Ratings
Overall · Offense · Defense ratings · Updated as season progresses
Georgia Rated Higher
Overall Power Rating
Florida #23
10.6
Georgia #1
28.6
Offense Rating
Florida #29
19.1
Georgia #1
30.0
Defense Rating (lower = better defense)
Florida #19
8.5
Georgia #1
0.0
Power ratings updated throughout the season as results accumulate
Momentum Control (CSS)
Consecutive Scoring Sequences Who builds scoring momentum? Georgia Edge
Avg sequences created per game
Florida #61
0.82
Georgia #14
1.62
Avg sequences allowed per game (lower is better)
Florida #59
1.09
Georgia #26
0.62
Georgia +0.80
CSS Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 58.4% of games historically
Based on 2025 full season · preseason estimate
Game Control (GC)
Win Probability Dominance Who controls games start to finish? Georgia Edge
Avg GC score per game (offense)
Florida #36
42.3
Georgia #4
59.7
Avg GC score allowed per game (lower is better)
Florida #87
43.6
Georgia #16
24.4
Georgia +17.3
GC Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 67.1% of games historically
Based on 2025 full season · preseason estimate
Coaching Matchup
Florida
Jon Sumrall #17
0–0 (0%) · Yr 1 at school
OC Buster Faulkner Yr 1 #30
DC Brad White Yr 1 #65
Staff Rating
3.35 #23
Georgia
Kirby Smart #5
117–21 (85%) · Yr 11 at school
OC Mike Bobo Yr 3 #16
DC Glenn Schumann Yr 3 #18
Staff Rating
3.98 #5
About these metrics
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games.

Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: Momentum Control is a great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set.

Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: Game Control is another great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set.

Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself