Missouri at Georgia Week 11 College Football Matchup Missouri at Georgia Matchup - Week 11
Sat, Nov 14 2026 · Week 11 · 🏟 Sanford Stadium Athens, GA · Turf · 92,746 cap
Missouri✈ 605 mi+1 hr TZ
Away
VS
Home
Preseason projection — This game has not yet been played and 2026 in-season data is not yet available. Edges are based on 2025 full-season performance. Confidence will increase once in-season games are logged.
📊 Punt & Rally Projection
Missouri
15
Georgia
31
P&R Line Georgia -15.5
P&R Total O/U 45.5
Confidence 55 Early Season
Matchup Prediction
Georgia has the edge in this matchup
Both Momentum Control (CSS) and Game Control metrics favor Georgia entering this game.
Momentum Control
58.4%
Georgia wins
Lean
Game Control
58.6%
Georgia wins
Lean
Advanced Stats
Advanced factors are split · No strong agreement signal
↓ See full breakdown
Missouri 2026 Schedule
Missouri's 2026 Schedule
DateMatchupSpreadTotalResultO/UCover
Sat 9/5Missouri vs Arkansas-Pine Bluff-31.5
Sat 9/12Missouri at Kansas-9
Sat 9/19Missouri vs Troy-24.5
Sat 9/26Missouri at Mississippi State-10
Sat 10/3Missouri vs Florida-9
Sat 10/10Missouri vs Texas A&M+1.5
Sat 10/17Missouri at Ole Miss+7
— Bye Week —
Sat 10/31Missouri at Arkansas-9.5
Sat 11/7Missouri vs Texas+11
Sat 11/14Missouri at Georgia+15.5
Sat 11/21Missouri vs Kentucky-15
Sat 11/28Missouri vs Oklahoma+3
Georgia 2026 Schedule
Georgia's 2026 Schedule
DateMatchupSpreadTotalResultO/UCover
Sat 9/5Georgia vs Tennessee State-37
Sat 9/12Georgia vs Western Kentucky-29
Sat 9/19Georgia at Arkansas-22.5
Sat 9/26Georgia vs Oklahoma-10
Sat 10/3Georgia vs Vanderbilt-22
Sat 10/10Georgia at Alabama-8
Sat 10/17Georgia vs Auburn-20
— Bye Week —
Sat 10/31Georgia vs Florida-22
Sat 11/7Georgia at Ole Miss-6
Sat 11/14Georgia vs Missouri-15.5
Sat 11/21Georgia at South Carolina-18
Sat 11/28Georgia vs Georgia Tech-23.5
Advanced Stats
Advanced Analytics Matchup
Matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense) · 2025 season (prior year)
Georgia PPA Edge
Agreement Signals — When All Metrics Agree
Elite · 83.1% ATS
PPA + PPO + SR + Havoc
Split
Metrics disagree
Elite · 82.4% ATS
PPA + PPO + Havoc
Split
Metrics disagree
Elite · 73.9% ATS
PPA + Success Rate
Split
Metrics disagree
Individual Factors — Ranked by Predictive Strength
PPA Overall
Points added per play · Elite predictor
Missouri #50
+0.292
Georgia #23
+0.300
Georgia Edge
PPA Passing
Pass efficiency edge · Strong predictor
Missouri #108
+0.405
Georgia #34
+0.464
Georgia Edge
Havoc Total
Def. disruption rate · Strong predictor
Missouri #8
0.198
Georgia #80
0.151
TFLs, sacks, PBUs, forced fumbles — higher is better
Missouri Edge
Points Per Opp
Drive-finishing edge · Strong predictor
Missouri #56
+7.522
Georgia #7
+8.154
Georgia Edge
Success Rate
Play consistency edge · Solid predictor
Missouri #42
+0.838
Georgia #14
+0.824
Missouri Edge
Field Position
Avg start (lower=better) · Solid predictor
Missouri #99
71.9
Georgia #62
70.7
Avg yards from own endzone to average start — lower is better · longer bar = better field position
Georgia Edge
Advanced stats sourced from CFBD · 2025 season (prior year — 2026 data not yet available) · Edges are matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense)
Power Ratings
Team Power Ratings
Overall · Offense · Defense ratings · Updated as season progresses
Georgia Rated Higher
Overall Power Rating
Missouri #20
12.2
Georgia #1
28.6
Offense Rating
Missouri #23
20.9
Georgia #1
30.0
Defense Rating (lower = better defense)
Missouri #20
8.7
Georgia #1
0.0
Power ratings updated throughout the season as results accumulate
Momentum Control (CSS)
Consecutive Scoring Sequences Who builds scoring momentum? Georgia Edge
Avg sequences created per game
Missouri #105
0.75
Georgia #14
1.62
Avg sequences allowed per game (lower is better)
Missouri #14
0.42
Georgia #26
0.62
Georgia +0.87
CSS Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 58.4% of games historically
Based on 2025 full season · preseason estimate
Game Control (GC)
Win Probability Dominance Who controls games start to finish? Georgia Edge
Avg GC score per game (offense)
Missouri #65
48.7
Georgia #4
59.7
Avg GC score allowed per game (lower is better)
Missouri #45
32.3
Georgia #16
24.4
Georgia +11.0
GC Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 58.6% of games historically
Based on 2025 full season · preseason estimate
Coaching Matchup
Missouri
Eliah Drinkwitz #19
46–29 (61%) · Yr 7 at school
OC Chip Lindsey Yr 1 #41
DC Corey Batoon Yr 3 #23
Staff Rating
3.50 #19
Georgia
Kirby Smart #5
117–21 (85%) · Yr 11 at school
OC Mike Bobo Yr 3 #16
DC Glenn Schumann Yr 3 #18
Staff Rating
3.98 #5
About these metrics
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games.

Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: Momentum Control is a great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set.

Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: Game Control is another great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set.

Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself