Ole Miss at Florida Week 4 College Football Matchup Ole Miss at Florida Matchup - Week 4
Sat, Sep 26 2026 · Week 4 · 🏟 Ben Hill Griffin Stadium Gainesville, FL · Turf · 88,548 cap
Ole Miss✈ 531 mi+1 hr TZ
Away
VS
Home
Preseason projection — This game has not yet been played and 2026 in-season data is not yet available. Edges are based on 2025 full-season performance. Confidence will increase once in-season games are logged.
📊 Punt & Rally Projection
Ole Miss
30
Florida
22
P&R Line Ole Miss -8
P&R Total O/U 52
Confidence 69 Good
Matchup Prediction
Ole Miss has the edge in this matchup
Both Momentum Control (CSS) and Game Control metrics favor Ole Miss entering this game.
Momentum Control
73.7%
Ole Miss wins
Solid
Game Control
75.9%
Ole Miss wins
Solid
Advanced Stats
All 4 factors agree → Ole Miss · 83.1% ATS historically when all four align
↓ See full breakdown
Ole Miss 2026 Schedule
Ole Miss's 2026 Schedule
DateMatchupSpreadTotalResultO/UCover
Sat 9/5Ole Miss vs Louisville-8.552.5
Sat 9/12Ole Miss vs Charlotte-34
Sat 9/19Ole Miss vs LSU-4
Sat 9/26Ole Miss at Florida-8
— Bye Week —
Sat 10/10Ole Miss at Vanderbilt-8
Sat 10/17Ole Miss vs Missouri-7
Sat 10/24Ole Miss at Texas+11.5
Sat 10/31Ole Miss vs Auburn-11.5
Sat 11/7Ole Miss vs Georgia+6
Sat 11/14Ole Miss at Oklahoma+3.5
Sat 11/21Ole Miss vs Wofford-33
Fri 11/27Ole Miss vs Mississippi State-19
Florida 2026 Schedule
Florida's 2026 Schedule
DateMatchupSpreadTotalResultO/UCover
Sat 9/5Florida vs Florida Atlantic-17
Sat 9/12Florida vs Campbell-29
Sat 9/19Florida at Auburn+4
Sat 9/26Florida vs Ole Miss+8
Sat 10/3Florida at Missouri+9
Sat 10/10Florida vs South Carolina-4
Sat 10/17Florida at Texas+22
— Bye Week —
Sat 10/31Florida at Georgia+22
Sat 11/7Florida vs Oklahoma+9
Sat 11/14Florida at Kentucky-3.5
Sat 11/21Florida vs Vanderbilt-2.5
Fri 11/27Florida at Florida State+2.5
Advanced Stats
Advanced Analytics Matchup
Matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense) · 2025 season (prior year)
Ole Miss PPA Edge
Agreement Signals — When All Metrics Agree
Elite · 83.1% ATS
PPA + PPO + SR + Havoc
All 4 Agree
→ Ole Miss
Elite · 82.4% ATS
PPA + PPO + Havoc
3 Agree
→ Ole Miss
Elite · 73.9% ATS
PPA + Success Rate
Both Agree
→ Ole Miss
Individual Factors — Ranked by Predictive Strength
PPA Overall
Points added per play · Elite predictor
Ole Miss #14
+0.486
Florida #87
+0.272
Ole Miss Edge
PPA Passing
Pass efficiency edge · Strong predictor
Ole Miss #8
+0.767
Florida #110
+0.304
Ole Miss Edge
Havoc Total
Def. disruption rate · Strong predictor
Ole Miss #46
0.167
Florida #98
0.145
TFLs, sacks, PBUs, forced fumbles — higher is better
Ole Miss Edge
Points Per Opp
Drive-finishing edge · Strong predictor
Ole Miss #19
+7.899
Florida #41
+7.098
Ole Miss Edge
Success Rate
Play consistency edge · Solid predictor
Ole Miss #16
+0.911
Florida #83
+0.816
Ole Miss Edge
Field Position
Avg start (lower=better) · Solid predictor
Ole Miss #99
71.9
Florida #106
72.3
Avg yards from own endzone to average start — lower is better · longer bar = better field position
Ole Miss Edge
Advanced stats sourced from CFBD · 2025 season (prior year — 2026 data not yet available) · Edges are matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense)
Power Ratings
Team Power Ratings
Overall · Offense · Defense ratings · Updated as season progresses
Ole Miss Rated Higher
Overall Power Rating
Ole Miss #15
16.4
Florida #23
10.6
Offense Rating
Ole Miss #16
22.1
Florida #29
19.1
Defense Rating (lower = better defense)
Ole Miss #11
5.7
Florida #19
8.5
Power ratings updated throughout the season as results accumulate
Momentum Control (CSS)
Consecutive Scoring Sequences Who builds scoring momentum? Ole Miss Edge
Avg sequences created per game
Ole Miss #7
1.93
Florida #61
0.82
Avg sequences allowed per game (lower is better)
Ole Miss #22
0.50
Florida #59
1.09
Ole Miss +1.11
CSS Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 73.7% of games historically
Based on 2025 full season · preseason estimate
Game Control (GC)
Win Probability Dominance Who controls games start to finish? Ole Miss Edge
Avg GC score per game (offense)
Ole Miss #12
64.0
Florida #36
42.3
Avg GC score allowed per game (lower is better)
Ole Miss #6
19.0
Florida #87
43.6
Ole Miss +21.7
GC Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 75.9% of games historically
Based on 2025 full season · preseason estimate
Coaching Matchup
Ole Miss
Pete Golding #77
2–1 (67%) · Yr 2 at school
OC John David Baker Yr 1 #16
DC Patrick Toney Yr 1 #49
Staff Rating
2.99 #49
Florida
Jon Sumrall #17
0–0 (0%) · Yr 1 at school
OC Buster Faulkner Yr 1 #30
DC Brad White Yr 1 #65
Staff Rating
3.35 #23
About these metrics
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games.

Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: Momentum Control is a great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set.

Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: Game Control is another great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set.

Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself