Oklahoma at Georgia Week 4 College Football Matchup Oklahoma at Georgia Matchup - Week 4
Sat, Sep 26 2026 · Week 4 · 🏟 Sanford Stadium Athens, GA · Turf · 92,746 cap
Oklahoma✈ 804 mi+1 hr TZ
Away
VS
Home
Preseason projection — This game has not yet been played and 2026 in-season data is not yet available. Edges are based on 2025 full-season performance. Confidence will increase once in-season games are logged.
📊 Punt & Rally Projection
Oklahoma
17
Georgia
29
P&R Line Georgia -11.5
P&R Total O/U 45.5
Confidence 63 Moderate
Matchup Prediction
Georgia has the edge in this matchup
Both Momentum Control (CSS) and Game Control metrics favor Georgia entering this game.
Momentum Control
58.4%
Georgia wins
Lean
Game Control
50.6%
Georgia wins
Toss-up
Advanced Stats
PPA + Success Rate agree → Georgia · 73.9% ATS historically
↓ See full breakdown
Oklahoma 2026 Schedule
Oklahoma's 2026 Schedule
DateMatchupSpreadTotalResultO/UCover
Sat 9/5Oklahoma vs UTEP-32.5
Sat 9/12Oklahoma at Michigan+1.5
Sat 9/19Oklahoma vs New Mexico-20.5
Sat 9/26Oklahoma at Georgia+11.5
— Bye Week —
Sat 10/10Oklahoma vs Texas+5
Sat 10/17Oklahoma vs Kentucky-18.5
Sat 10/24Oklahoma at Mississippi State-14.5
Sat 10/31Oklahoma vs South Carolina-12
Sat 11/7Oklahoma at Florida-3
Sat 11/14Oklahoma vs Ole Miss-4.5
Sat 11/21Oklahoma vs Texas A&M-3.5
Sat 11/28Oklahoma at Missouri-2
Georgia 2026 Schedule
Georgia's 2026 Schedule
DateMatchupSpreadTotalResultO/UCover
Sat 9/5Georgia vs Tennessee State-37
Sat 9/12Georgia vs Western Kentucky-31
Sat 9/19Georgia at Arkansas-22.5
Sat 9/26Georgia vs Oklahoma-11.5
Sat 10/3Georgia vs Vanderbilt-22.5
Sat 10/10Georgia at Alabama-7
Sat 10/17Georgia vs Auburn-21
— Bye Week —
Sat 10/31Georgia vs Florida-17
Sat 11/7Georgia at Ole Miss-8.5
Sat 11/14Georgia vs Missouri-16
Sat 11/21Georgia at South Carolina-16
Sat 11/28Georgia vs Georgia Tech-26
Advanced Stats
Advanced Analytics Matchup
Matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense) · 2025 season (prior year)
Georgia PPA Edge
Agreement Signals — When All Metrics Agree
Elite · 83.1% ATS
PPA + PPO + SR + Havoc
Split
Metrics disagree
Elite · 82.4% ATS
PPA + PPO + Havoc
Split
Metrics disagree
Elite · 73.9% ATS
PPA + Success Rate
Both Agree
→ Georgia
Individual Factors — Ranked by Predictive Strength
PPA Overall
Points added per play · Elite predictor
Oklahoma #108
+0.196
Georgia #23
+0.262
Georgia Edge
PPA Passing
Pass efficiency edge · Strong predictor
Oklahoma #95
+0.433
Georgia #34
+0.454
Georgia Edge
Havoc Total
Def. disruption rate · Strong predictor
Oklahoma #3
0.227
Georgia #80
0.151
TFLs, sacks, PBUs, forced fumbles — higher is better
Oklahoma Edge
Points Per Opp
Drive-finishing edge · Strong predictor
Oklahoma #62
+7.440
Georgia #7
+7.410
Oklahoma Edge
Success Rate
Play consistency edge · Solid predictor
Oklahoma #103
+0.788
Georgia #14
+0.799
Georgia Edge
Field Position
Avg start (lower=better) · Solid predictor
Oklahoma #22
68.8
Georgia #62
70.7
Avg yards from own endzone to average start — lower is better · longer bar = better field position
Oklahoma Edge
Advanced stats sourced from CFBD · 2025 season (prior year — 2026 data not yet available) · Edges are matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense)
Power Ratings
Team Power Ratings
Overall · Offense · Defense ratings · Updated as season progresses
Georgia Rated Higher
Overall Power Rating
Oklahoma #9
19.1
Georgia #1
28.6
Offense Rating
Oklahoma #12
24.6
Georgia #1
30.0
Defense Rating (lower = better defense)
Oklahoma #10
5.5
Georgia #1
0.0
Power ratings updated throughout the season as results accumulate
Momentum Control (CSS)
Consecutive Scoring Sequences Who builds scoring momentum? Georgia Edge
Avg sequences created per game
Oklahoma #55
1.42
Georgia #14
1.62
Avg sequences allowed per game (lower is better)
Oklahoma #20
0.50
Georgia #26
0.62
Georgia +0.20
CSS Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 58.4% of games historically
Based on 2025 full season · preseason estimate
Game Control (GC)
Win Probability Dominance Who controls games start to finish? Georgia Edge
Avg GC score per game (offense)
Oklahoma #22
58.6
Georgia #4
59.7
Avg GC score allowed per game (lower is better)
Oklahoma #13
23.0
Georgia #16
24.4
Georgia +1.1
GC Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 50.6% of games historically
Based on 2025 full season · preseason estimate
Coaching Matchup
Oklahoma
Brent Venables #26
32–20 (62%) · Yr 5 at school
OC Ben Arbuckle Yr 2 #26
DC Todd Bates Yr 1 #44
Staff Rating
3.40 #21
Georgia
Kirby Smart #5
117–21 (85%) · Yr 11 at school
OC Mike Bobo Yr 3 #16
DC Glenn Schumann Yr 3 #18
Staff Rating
3.98 #5
About these metrics
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games.

Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: Momentum Control is a great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set.

Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: Game Control is another great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set.

Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself