Florida at Missouri Week 5 College Football Matchup Florida at Missouri Matchup - Week 5
Sat, Oct 3 2026 · Week 5 · 🏟 Faurot Field Columbia, MO · Turf · 71,168 cap
Florida✈ 857 mi-1 hr TZ
Away
VS
Home
Preseason projection — This game has not yet been played and 2026 in-season data is not yet available. Edges are based on 2025 full-season performance. Confidence will increase once in-season games are logged.
📊 Punt & Rally Projection
Florida
19
Missouri
28
P&R Line Missouri -9
P&R Total O/U 47.5
Confidence 63 Moderate
Matchup Prediction
Metrics disagree on this matchup
Momentum Control favors Florida, while Game Control favors Missouri. Split signals historically show weaker predictive confidence — treat as a toss-up.
⚡ Split Signal — Metrics Disagree
Momentum Control
61.3%
Florida wins
Lean
Game Control
58.6%
Missouri wins
Lean
Advanced Stats
PPA + Success Rate agree → Missouri · 73.9% ATS historically
↓ See full breakdown
Florida 2026 Schedule
Florida's 2026 Schedule
DateMatchupSpreadTotalResultO/UCover
Sat 9/5Florida vs Florida Atlantic-17
Sat 9/12Florida vs Campbell-29
Sat 9/19Florida at Auburn+4
Sat 9/26Florida vs Ole Miss+8
Sat 10/3Florida at Missouri+9
Sat 10/10Florida vs South Carolina-4
Sat 10/17Florida at Texas+22
— Bye Week —
Sat 10/31Florida at Georgia+22
Sat 11/7Florida vs Oklahoma+9
Sat 11/14Florida at Kentucky-3.5
Sat 11/21Florida vs Vanderbilt-2.5
Fri 11/27Florida at Florida State+2.5
Missouri 2026 Schedule
Missouri's 2026 Schedule
DateMatchupSpreadTotalResultO/UCover
Sat 9/5Missouri vs Arkansas-Pine Bluff-31.5
Sat 9/12Missouri at Kansas-9
Sat 9/19Missouri vs Troy-24.5
Sat 9/26Missouri at Mississippi State-10
Sat 10/3Missouri vs Florida-9
Sat 10/10Missouri vs Texas A&M+1.5
Sat 10/17Missouri at Ole Miss+7
— Bye Week —
Sat 10/31Missouri at Arkansas-9.5
Sat 11/7Missouri vs Texas+11
Sat 11/14Missouri at Georgia+15.5
Sat 11/21Missouri vs Kentucky-15
Sat 11/28Missouri vs Oklahoma+3
Advanced Stats
Advanced Analytics Matchup
Matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense) · 2025 season (prior year)
Missouri PPA Edge
Agreement Signals — When All Metrics Agree
Elite · 83.1% ATS
PPA + PPO + SR + Havoc
Split
Metrics disagree
Elite · 82.4% ATS
PPA + PPO + Havoc
Split
Metrics disagree
Elite · 73.9% ATS
PPA + Success Rate
Both Agree
→ Missouri
Individual Factors — Ranked by Predictive Strength
PPA Overall
Points added per play · Elite predictor
Florida #87
+0.179
Missouri #50
+0.379
Missouri Edge
PPA Passing
Pass efficiency edge · Strong predictor
Florida #110
+0.273
Missouri #108
+0.481
Missouri Edge
Havoc Total
Def. disruption rate · Strong predictor
Florida #98
0.145
Missouri #8
0.198
TFLs, sacks, PBUs, forced fumbles — higher is better
Missouri Edge
Points Per Opp
Drive-finishing edge · Strong predictor
Florida #41
+7.364
Missouri #56
+7.311
Florida Edge
Success Rate
Play consistency edge · Solid predictor
Florida #83
+0.762
Missouri #42
+0.880
Missouri Edge
Field Position
Avg start (lower=better) · Solid predictor
Florida #106
72.3
Missouri #99
71.9
Avg yards from own endzone to average start — lower is better · longer bar = better field position
Missouri Edge
Advanced stats sourced from CFBD · 2025 season (prior year — 2026 data not yet available) · Edges are matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense)
Power Ratings
Team Power Ratings
Overall · Offense · Defense ratings · Updated as season progresses
Missouri Rated Higher
Overall Power Rating
Florida #23
10.6
Missouri #20
12.2
Offense Rating
Florida #29
19.1
Missouri #23
20.9
Defense Rating (lower = better defense)
Florida #19
8.5
Missouri #20
8.7
Power ratings updated throughout the season as results accumulate
Momentum Control (CSS)
Consecutive Scoring Sequences Who builds scoring momentum? Florida Edge
Avg sequences created per game
Florida #61
0.82
Missouri #105
0.75
Avg sequences allowed per game (lower is better)
Florida #59
1.09
Missouri #14
0.42
Florida +0.07
CSS Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 61.3% of games historically
Based on 2025 full season · preseason estimate
Game Control (GC)
Win Probability Dominance Who controls games start to finish? Missouri Edge
Avg GC score per game (offense)
Florida #36
42.3
Missouri #65
48.7
Avg GC score allowed per game (lower is better)
Florida #87
43.6
Missouri #45
32.3
Missouri +6.3
GC Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 58.6% of games historically
Based on 2025 full season · preseason estimate
Coaching Matchup
Florida
Jon Sumrall #17
0–0 (0%) · Yr 1 at school
OC Buster Faulkner Yr 1 #30
DC Brad White Yr 1 #65
Staff Rating
3.35 #23
Missouri
Eliah Drinkwitz #19
46–29 (61%) · Yr 7 at school
OC Chip Lindsey Yr 1 #41
DC Corey Batoon Yr 3 #23
Staff Rating
3.50 #19
About these metrics
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games.

Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: CSS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set.

Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: GS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set.

Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself