Kentucky at Missouri Week 12 College Football Matchup Kentucky at Missouri Matchup - Week 12
Sat, Nov 21 2026 · Week 12 · 🏟 Faurot Field Columbia, MO · Turf · 71,168 cap
Kentucky✈ 427 mi-1 hr TZ
Away
VS
Home
Preseason projection — This game has not yet been played and 2026 in-season data is not yet available. Edges are based on 2025 full-season performance. Confidence will increase once in-season games are logged.
📊 Punt & Rally Projection
Kentucky
18
Missouri
33
P&R Line Missouri -15
P&R Total O/U 50.5
Confidence 69 Good
Matchup Prediction
Metrics disagree on this matchup
Momentum Control favors Kentucky, while Game Control favors Missouri. Split signals historically show weaker predictive confidence — treat as a toss-up.
⚡ Split Signal — Metrics Disagree
Momentum Control
61.3%
Kentucky wins
Lean
Game Control
58.6%
Missouri wins
Lean
Advanced Stats
All 4 factors agree → Missouri · 83.1% ATS historically when all four align
↓ See full breakdown
Kentucky 2026 Schedule
Kentucky's 2026 Schedule
DateMatchupSpreadTotalResultO/UCover
Sat 9/5Kentucky vs Youngstown State-24.5
Sat 9/12Kentucky vs Alabama+12.5
Sat 9/19Kentucky at Texas A&M+19
Sat 9/26Kentucky vs South Alabama-16
Sat 10/3Kentucky at South Carolina+7
Sat 10/10Kentucky vs LSU+12.5
Sat 10/17Kentucky at Oklahoma+20
Sat 10/24Kentucky vs Vanderbilt+3.5
— Bye Week —
Sat 11/7Kentucky at Tennessee+16.5
Sat 11/14Kentucky vs Florida+3.5
Sat 11/21Kentucky at Missouri+15
Sat 11/28Kentucky vs Louisville+8
Missouri 2026 Schedule
Missouri's 2026 Schedule
DateMatchupSpreadTotalResultO/UCover
Sat 9/5Missouri vs Arkansas-Pine Bluff-31.5
Sat 9/12Missouri at Kansas-9
Sat 9/19Missouri vs Troy-24.5
Sat 9/26Missouri at Mississippi State-10
Sat 10/3Missouri vs Florida-9
Sat 10/10Missouri vs Texas A&M+1.5
Sat 10/17Missouri at Ole Miss+7
— Bye Week —
Sat 10/31Missouri at Arkansas-9.5
Sat 11/7Missouri vs Texas+11
Sat 11/14Missouri at Georgia+15.5
Sat 11/21Missouri vs Kentucky-15
Sat 11/28Missouri vs Oklahoma+3
Advanced Stats
Advanced Analytics Matchup
Matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense) · 2025 season (prior year)
Missouri PPA Edge
Agreement Signals — When All Metrics Agree
Elite · 83.1% ATS
PPA + PPO + SR + Havoc
All 4 Agree
→ Missouri
Elite · 82.4% ATS
PPA + PPO + Havoc
3 Agree
→ Missouri
Elite · 73.9% ATS
PPA + Success Rate
Both Agree
→ Missouri
Individual Factors — Ranked by Predictive Strength
PPA Overall
Points added per play · Elite predictor
Kentucky #115
+0.116
Missouri #50
+0.380
Missouri Edge
PPA Passing
Pass efficiency edge · Strong predictor
Kentucky #101
+0.291
Missouri #108
+0.486
Missouri Edge
Havoc Total
Def. disruption rate · Strong predictor
Kentucky #93
0.147
Missouri #8
0.198
TFLs, sacks, PBUs, forced fumbles — higher is better
Missouri Edge
Points Per Opp
Drive-finishing edge · Strong predictor
Kentucky #57
+7.205
Missouri #56
+7.835
Missouri Edge
Success Rate
Play consistency edge · Solid predictor
Kentucky #81
+0.762
Missouri #42
+0.885
Missouri Edge
Field Position
Avg start (lower=better) · Solid predictor
Kentucky #53
70.4
Missouri #99
71.9
Avg yards from own endzone to average start — lower is better · longer bar = better field position
Kentucky Edge
Advanced stats sourced from CFBD · 2025 season (prior year — 2026 data not yet available) · Edges are matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense)
Power Ratings
Team Power Ratings
Overall · Offense · Defense ratings · Updated as season progresses
Missouri Rated Higher
Overall Power Rating
Kentucky #71
0.2
Missouri #20
12.2
Offense Rating
Kentucky #61
16.3
Missouri #23
20.9
Defense Rating (lower = better defense)
Kentucky #77
16.1
Missouri #20
8.7
Power ratings updated throughout the season as results accumulate
Momentum Control (CSS)
Consecutive Scoring Sequences Who builds scoring momentum? Kentucky Edge
Avg sequences created per game
Kentucky #80
0.91
Missouri #105
0.75
Avg sequences allowed per game (lower is better)
Kentucky #83
1.36
Missouri #14
0.42
Kentucky +0.16
CSS Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 61.3% of games historically
Based on 2025 full season · preseason estimate
Game Control (GC)
Win Probability Dominance Who controls games start to finish? Missouri Edge
Avg GC score per game (offense)
Kentucky #68
40.1
Missouri #65
48.7
Avg GC score allowed per game (lower is better)
Kentucky #95
47.0
Missouri #45
32.3
Missouri +8.5
GC Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 58.6% of games historically
Based on 2025 full season · preseason estimate
Coaching Matchup
Kentucky
Will Stein #77
0–0 (0%) · Yr 1 at school
OC Joe Sloan Yr 1 #115
DC Jay Bateman Yr 1 #38
Staff Rating
2.60 #77
Missouri
Eliah Drinkwitz #19
46–29 (61%) · Yr 7 at school
OC Chip Lindsey Yr 1 #41
DC Corey Batoon Yr 3 #23
Staff Rating
3.50 #19
About these metrics
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games.

Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: CSS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set.

Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: GS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set.

Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself