Sat, Nov 5 2022
·
Week 10
·
🏟 Romney Stadium
Logan, UT
·
Turf
·
25,513 cap
New Mexico✈ 540 miSame TZ
Matchup Prediction
Metrics disagree on this matchup
Momentum Control favors Utah State,
while Game Control favors New Mexico.
Split signals historically show weaker predictive confidence — treat as a toss-up.
⚡ Split Signal — Metrics Disagree
Momentum Control
58.4%
Utah State wins
Lean
Game Control
58.3%
New Mexico wins
Lean
Vegas Spread
Utah State -14.5
O/U 42.5
teamrankings
Advanced Stats
PPA + Success Rate agree → Utah State
· 73.9% ATS historically
↓ See full breakdown
New Mexico 2022 Schedule
New Mexico's 2022 Schedule
| Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 9/3 | New Mexico vs Maine | -6.0W41–0 | 42.5 | W41–0 | U | Y |
| Fri 9/9 | New Mexico vs Boise State | +17.0L14–31 | 43.5 | L14–31 | O | Y |
| Sat 9/17 | New Mexico vs UTEP | +2.0W27–10 | 38.0 | W27–10 | U | Y |
| Sat 9/24 | New Mexico at LSU | +31.5L0–38 | 44.0 | L0–38 | U | N |
| Fri 9/30 | New Mexico at UNLV | +14.0L20–31 | 44.0 | L20–31 | O | Y |
| Sat 10/8 | New Mexico vs Wyoming | +3.0L14–27 | 37.0 | L14–27 | O | N |
| Sat 10/15 | New Mexico at New Mexico State | -7.0L9–21 | 38.5 | L9–21 | U | N |
| Sat 10/22 | New Mexico vs Fresno State | +9.5L9–41 | 40.0 | L9–41 | O | N |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Sat 11/5 | New Mexico at Utah State | +14.5L10–27 | 42.5 | L10–27 | U | N |
| Sat 11/12 | New Mexico at Air Force | +21.0L3–35 | 37.5 | L3–35 | O | N |
| Fri 11/18 | New Mexico vs San Diego State | +15.0L10–34 | 36.0 | L10–34 | O | N |
| Fri 11/25 | New Mexico at Colorado State | +7.5L0–17 | 36.0 | L0–17 | U | N |
Utah State 2022 Schedule
Utah State's 2022 Schedule
| Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 8/27 | Utah State vs UConn | -24.0W31–20 | 59.0 | W31–20 | U | N |
| Sat 9/3 | Utah State at Alabama | +42.0L0–55 | 63.0 | L0–55 | U | N |
| Sat 9/10 | Utah State vs Weber State | -6.5L7–35 | 59.5 | L7–35 | U | N |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Sat 9/24 | Utah State vs UNLV | +3.0L24–34 | 61.5 | L24–34 | U | N |
| Thu 9/29 | Utah State at BYU | +26.0L26–38 | 60.0 | L26–38 | O | Y |
| Sat 10/8 | Utah State vs Air Force | +11.5W34–27 | 54.0 | W34–27 | O | Y |
| Sat 10/15 | Utah State at Colorado State | -14.0W17–13 | 45.5 | W17–13 | U | N |
| Sat 10/22 | Utah State at Wyoming | +5.0L14–28 | 44.5 | L14–28 | U | N |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Sat 11/5 | Utah State vs New Mexico | -14.5W27–10 | 42.5 | W27–10 | U | Y |
| Sat 11/12 | Utah State at Hawai'i | -10.0W41–34 | 55.0 | W41–34 | O | N |
| Sat 11/19 | Utah State vs San José State | -1.0W35–31 | 51.0 | W35–31 | O | Y |
| Fri 11/25 | Utah State at Boise State | +17.0L23–42 | 51.5 | L23–42 | O | N |
| Tue 12/27 | Utah State vs Memphis | +8.0L10–38 | 57.0 | L10–38 | U | N |
Advanced Stats
Advanced Analytics Matchup
Matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense) ·
2022 season
Agreement Signals — When All Metrics Agree
Elite · 83.1% ATS
PPA + PPO + SR + Havoc
Split
Metrics disagree
Elite · 82.4% ATS
PPA + PPO + Havoc
Split
Metrics disagree
Elite · 73.9% ATS
PPA + Success Rate
Both Agree
→ Utah State
Individual Factors — Ranked by Predictive Strength
PPA Overall
Points added per play · Elite predictor
PPA Passing
Pass efficiency edge · Strong predictor
Havoc Total
Def. disruption rate · Strong predictor
TFLs, sacks, PBUs, forced fumbles — higher is better
Points Per Opp
Drive-finishing edge · Strong predictor
Success Rate
Play consistency edge · Solid predictor
Field Position
Avg start (lower=better) · Solid predictor
Avg yards from own endzone to average start — lower is better · longer bar = better field position
Advanced stats sourced from CFBD · 2022 season ·
Edges are matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense)
Power Ratings
Team Power Ratings
Overall · Offense · Defense ratings · Updated as season progresses
Power ratings updated throughout the season as results accumulate
Momentum Control (CSS)
Consecutive Scoring Sequences
Who builds scoring momentum?
Utah State Edge
Utah State +0.43
CSS Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 58.4% of games historically
Based on 7 games this season
Game Control (GC)
Win Probability Dominance
Who controls games start to finish?
New Mexico Edge
New Mexico +10.2
GC Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 58.3% of games historically
Based on 8 games this season
Spread Context
ATS Historical Context
Based on 2021–2025 backtest · FBS vs FBS · Regular season
CSS and GC disagree on this matchup. When the metrics split, historical cover rates are essentially random — treat this as a coin flip against the spread.
ATS data is informational only. Past cover rates do not guarantee future results.
Coaching Matchup
New Mexico
Danny Gonzales #1
5–14 (26%)
· Yr 3 at school
OC
Derek Warehime
Yr 1
#1
DC
Rocky Long
Yr 2
#1
Utah State
Blake Anderson #1
11–3 (79%)
· Yr 2 at school
OC
Anthony Tucker
Yr 2
#1
DC
Ephraim Banda
Yr 2
#1
About these metrics
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games. ✓
Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: Momentum Control is a great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: Game Control is another great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself ✓
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games. ✓
Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: Momentum Control is a great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: Game Control is another great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself ✓