Sat, Sep 17 2022
·
Week 3
·
🏟 Wallace Wade Stadium
Durham, NC
·
Turf
·
40,000 cap
Matchup Prediction
Toss-up — no clear edge
Neither metric shows a meaningful pre-game edge in this matchup.
Momentum Control
58.4%
—
Lean
Game Control
50.6%
—
Toss-up
Vegas Spread
Duke -30.5
O/U 53.0
consensus
North Carolina A&T 2022 Schedule
North Carolina A&T's 2022 Schedule
| Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Sat 9/17 | North Carolina A&T at Duke | +30.5L20–49 | 53.0 | L20–49 | O | Y |
Duke 2022 Schedule
Duke's 2022 Schedule
| Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 9/2 | Duke vs Temple | -9.5W30–0 | 51.5 | W30–0 | U | Y |
| Sat 9/10 | Duke at Northwestern | +10.0W31–23 | 56.5 | W31–23 | U | Y |
| Sat 9/17 | Duke vs North Carolina A&T | -30.5W49–20 | 53.0 | W49–20 | O | N |
| Sat 9/24 | Duke at Kansas | +7.5L27–35 | 66.0 | L27–35 | U | N |
| Sat 10/1 | Duke vs Virginia | -2.0W38–17 | 55.0 | W38–17 | U | Y |
| Sat 10/8 | Duke at Georgia Tech | -3.5L20–23 | 54.0 | L20–23 | U | N |
| Sat 10/15 | Duke vs North Carolina | +7.0L35–38 | 70.0 | L35–38 | O | Y |
| Sat 10/22 | Duke at Miami | +10.0W45–21 | 59.0 | W45–21 | O | Y |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Fri 11/4 | Duke at Boston College | -11.5W38–31 | 47.0 | W38–31 | O | N |
| Sat 11/12 | Duke vs Virginia Tech | -10.0W24–7 | 50.0 | W24–7 | U | Y |
| Sat 11/19 | Duke at Pittsburgh | +6.5L26–28 | 49.0 | L26–28 | O | Y |
| Sat 11/26 | Duke vs Wake Forest | +3.0W34–31 | 67.0 | W34–31 | U | Y |
| Wed 12/28 | Duke vs UCF | -3.5W30–13 | 63.0 | W30–13 | U | Y |
Momentum Control (CSS)
Consecutive Scoring Sequences
Who builds scoring momentum?
North Carolina A&T Edge
North Carolina A&T +0.00
CSS Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 58.4% of games historically
Based on 2 games this season
Game Control (GC)
Win Probability Dominance
Who controls games start to finish?
North Carolina A&T Edge
North Carolina A&T +0.0
GC Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 50.6% of games historically
Based on 2 games this season
Actual Result
CSS Battle
Duke
2 — 0 sequences
✗ Predicted incorrectly
GC Battle
Duke
99.7 — 0.2 GC score
✗ Predicted incorrectly
Game Result
Duke won by 29
Spread Context
ATS Historical Context
Based on 2021–2025 backtest · FBS vs FBS · Regular season
Both metrics agree on Duke, but the GC edge is small. When metrics agree but GC is near-neutral, the agreed-upon team has covered only 46.7% of the time historically (n=224) — potentially a fade signal.
ATS data is informational only. Past cover rates do not guarantee future results.
About these metrics
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games. ✓
Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: Momentum Control is a great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: Game Control is another great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself ✓
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games. ✓
Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: Momentum Control is a great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: Game Control is another great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself ✓