Sat, Oct 15 2022
·
Week 7
·
🏟 Husky Stadium
Seattle, WA
·
Turf
·
70,500 cap
Arizona✈ 1,220 miSame TZ
Matchup Prediction
Washington
has the edge in this matchup
Both Momentum Control (CSS) and Game Control metrics favor
Washington entering this game.
Momentum Control
58.4%
Washington wins
Lean
Game Control
76%
Washington wins
Strong
Vegas Spread
Washington -14.5
O/U 71.5
teamrankings
Advanced Stats
All 4 factors agree → Washington
· 83.1% ATS historically when all four align
↓ See full breakdown
Arizona 2022 Schedule
Arizona's 2022 Schedule
| Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 9/3 | Arizona at San Diego State | +6.0W38–20 | 46.5 | W38–20 | O | Y |
| Sat 9/10 | Arizona vs Mississippi State | +11.5L17–39 | 57.5 | L17–39 | U | N |
| Sat 9/17 | Arizona vs North Dakota State | +3.0W31–28 | 49.0 | W31–28 | O | Y |
| Sat 9/24 | Arizona at California | +3.5L31–49 | 50.0 | L31–49 | O | N |
| Sat 10/1 | Arizona vs Colorado | -17.5W43–20 | 57.5 | W43–20 | O | Y |
| Sat 10/8 | Arizona vs Oregon | +13.5L22–49 | 70.5 | L22–49 | O | N |
| Sat 10/15 | Arizona at Washington | +14.5L39–49 | 71.5 | L39–49 | O | Y |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Sat 10/29 | Arizona vs USC | +14.0L37–45 | 74.0 | L37–45 | O | Y |
| Sat 11/5 | Arizona at Utah | +17.5L20–45 | 67.5 | L20–45 | U | N |
| Sat 11/12 | Arizona at UCLA | +19.5W34–28 | 76.5 | W34–28 | U | Y |
| Sat 11/19 | Arizona vs Washington State | +4.0L20–31 | 63.0 | L20–31 | U | N |
| Fri 11/25 | Arizona vs Arizona State | -4.0W38–35 | 66.5 | W38–35 | O | N |
Washington 2022 Schedule
Washington's 2022 Schedule
| Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 9/3 | Washington vs Kent State | -23.5W45–20 | 61.5 | W45–20 | O | Y |
| Sat 9/10 | Washington vs Portland State | -31.0W52–6 | 55.0 | W52–6 | O | Y |
| Sat 9/17 | Washington vs Michigan State | -3.5W39–28 | 56.5 | W39–28 | O | Y |
| Sat 9/24 | Washington vs Stanford | -14.0W40–22 | 62.5 | W40–22 | U | Y |
| Fri 9/30 | Washington at UCLA | -2.5L32–40 | 65.0 | L32–40 | O | N |
| Sat 10/8 | Washington at Arizona State | -13.5L38–45 | 56.0 | L38–45 | O | N |
| Sat 10/15 | Washington vs Arizona | -14.5W49–39 | 71.5 | W49–39 | O | N |
| Sat 10/22 | Washington at California | -7.5W28–21 | 54.5 | W28–21 | U | N |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Fri 11/4 | Washington vs Oregon State | -4.5W24–21 | 53.5 | W24–21 | U | N |
| Sat 11/12 | Washington at Oregon | +12.0W37–34 | 73.0 | W37–34 | U | Y |
| Sat 11/19 | Washington vs Colorado | -30.5W54–7 | 61.5 | W54–7 | U | Y |
| Sat 11/26 | Washington at Washington State | -2.0W51–33 | 60.0 | W51–33 | O | Y |
| Thu 12/29 | Washington vs Texas | +3.0W27–20 | 67.0 | W27–20 | U | Y |
Advanced Stats
Advanced Analytics Matchup
Matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense) ·
2022 season
Agreement Signals — When All Metrics Agree
Elite · 83.1% ATS
PPA + PPO + SR + Havoc
All 4 Agree
→ Washington
Elite · 82.4% ATS
PPA + PPO + Havoc
3 Agree
→ Washington
Elite · 73.9% ATS
PPA + Success Rate
Both Agree
→ Washington
Individual Factors — Ranked by Predictive Strength
PPA Overall
Points added per play · Elite predictor
PPA Passing
Pass efficiency edge · Strong predictor
Havoc Total
Def. disruption rate · Strong predictor
TFLs, sacks, PBUs, forced fumbles — higher is better
Points Per Opp
Drive-finishing edge · Strong predictor
Success Rate
Play consistency edge · Solid predictor
Field Position
Avg start (lower=better) · Solid predictor
Avg yards from own endzone to average start — lower is better · longer bar = better field position
Advanced stats sourced from CFBD · 2022 season ·
Edges are matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense)
Power Ratings
Team Power Ratings
Overall · Offense · Defense ratings · Updated as season progresses
Power ratings updated throughout the season as results accumulate
Momentum Control (CSS)
Consecutive Scoring Sequences
Who builds scoring momentum?
Washington Edge
Washington +0.60
CSS Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 58.4% of games historically
Based on 5 games this season
Game Control (GC)
Win Probability Dominance
Who controls games start to finish?
Washington Edge
Washington +33.8
GC Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 76% of games historically
Based on 6 games this season
Actual Result
CSS Battle
Tie
1 — 1 sequences
✗ Predicted incorrectly
GC Battle
Washington
92.0 — 4.0 GC score
✓ Predicted correctly
Game Result
Washington won by 10
✓ Model called it
Spread Context
ATS Historical Context
Based on 2021–2025 backtest · FBS vs FBS · Regular season
Both metrics agree on Washington with a large edge. Historically, dominant teams like this are fully priced into the spread — the agreed-upon team covers just 50.2% of the time. The metrics predict game control better than they beat the number.
ATS data is informational only. Past cover rates do not guarantee future results.
Coaching Matchup
Arizona
Jedd Fisch #1
1–11 (8%)
· Yr 2 at school
OC
Brennan Carroll
Yr 2
#1
DC
Johnny Nansen
Yr 1
#1
Washington
Kalen DeBoer #1
0–0 (0%)
· Yr 1 at school
OC
Ryan Grubb
Yr 1
#1
DC
William Inge
Yr 1
#1
About these metrics
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games. ✓
Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: CSS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: GS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself ✓
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games. ✓
Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: CSS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: GS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself ✓