Sat, Sep 10 2022
·
Week 2
·
🏟 Husky Stadium
Seattle, WA
·
Turf
·
70,500 cap
Portland State✈ 147 miSame TZ
Preseason projection — This game has not yet been played and 2022 in-season data is not yet available.
Edges are based on 2021 full-season performance.
Confidence will increase once in-season games are logged.
Matchup Prediction
Toss-up — no clear edge
Neither metric shows a meaningful pre-game edge in this matchup.
Momentum Control
58.4%
—
Lean
Game Control
76%
Washington wins
Strong
Vegas Spread
Washington -31
O/U 55.0
consensus
Portland State 2022 Schedule
Portland State's 2022 Schedule
| Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 9/1 | Portland State at San José State | +22.0L17–21 | 51.0 | L17–21 | U | Y |
| Sat 9/10 | Portland State at Washington | +31.0L6–52 | 55.0 | L6–52 | O | N |
Washington 2022 Schedule
Washington's 2022 Schedule
| Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 9/3 | Washington vs Kent State | -23.5W45–20 | 61.5 | W45–20 | O | Y |
| Sat 9/10 | Washington vs Portland State | -31.0W52–6 | 55.0 | W52–6 | O | Y |
| Sat 9/17 | Washington vs Michigan State | -3.5W39–28 | 56.5 | W39–28 | O | Y |
| Sat 9/24 | Washington vs Stanford | -14.0W40–22 | 62.5 | W40–22 | U | Y |
| Fri 9/30 | Washington at UCLA | -2.5L32–40 | 65.0 | L32–40 | O | N |
| Sat 10/8 | Washington at Arizona State | -13.5L38–45 | 56.0 | L38–45 | O | N |
| Sat 10/15 | Washington vs Arizona | -14.5W49–39 | 71.5 | W49–39 | O | N |
| Sat 10/22 | Washington at California | -7.5W28–21 | 54.5 | W28–21 | U | N |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Fri 11/4 | Washington vs Oregon State | -4.5W24–21 | 53.5 | W24–21 | U | N |
| Sat 11/12 | Washington at Oregon | +12.0W37–34 | 73.0 | W37–34 | U | Y |
| Sat 11/19 | Washington vs Colorado | -30.5W54–7 | 61.5 | W54–7 | U | Y |
| Sat 11/26 | Washington at Washington State | -2.0W51–33 | 60.0 | W51–33 | O | Y |
| Thu 12/29 | Washington vs Texas | +3.0W27–20 | 67.0 | W27–20 | U | Y |
Momentum Control (CSS)
Consecutive Scoring Sequences
Who builds scoring momentum?
Portland State Edge
Portland State +0.00
CSS Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 58.4% of games historically
Based on 2021 full season · preseason estimate
Game Control (GC)
Win Probability Dominance
Who controls games start to finish?
Washington Edge
Washington +40.6
GC Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 76% of games historically
Based on 2021 full season · preseason estimate
About these metrics
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games. ✓
Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: Momentum Control is a great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: Game Control is another great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself ✓
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games. ✓
Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: Momentum Control is a great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: Game Control is another great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself ✓