Texas at Washington Week 1 College Football Matchup Texas at Washington Matchup - Week 1
Fri, Dec 30 2022 · Postseason · Neutral Site · 🏟 Alamodome San Antonio, TX · Turf · 65,000 cap
Washington✈ 1,787 mi+2 hr TZ
Away (Neutral)
20 27
Final
Home (Neutral)
📊 Punt & Rally Projection
Texas
36
Washington
28
P&R Line Texas -7.5
P&R Total O/U 64
Confidence 90 High
Vegas Texas -3 · O/U 67.0
Matchup Prediction
Texas has the edge in this matchup
Both Momentum Control (CSS) and Game Control metrics favor Texas entering this game.
Momentum Control
61.3%
Texas wins
Lean
Game Control
49.4%
Texas wins
Toss-up
Vegas Spread
Texas -3
O/U 67.0
Bovada
Advanced Stats
All 4 factors agree → Texas · 83.1% ATS historically when all four align
↓ See full breakdown
Texas 2022 Schedule
Texas's 2022 Schedule
DateMatchupSpreadTotalResultO/UCover
Sat 9/3Texas vs UL Monroe-37.0W52–1064.5W52–10UY
Sat 9/10Texas vs Alabama+21.0L19–2064.0L19–20UY
Sat 9/17Texas vs UTSA-13.0W41–2057.5W41–20OY
Sat 9/24Texas at Texas Tech-7.0L34–3760.0L34–37ON
Sat 10/1Texas vs West Virginia-7.5W38–2061.0W38–20UY
Sat 10/8Texas vs Oklahoma-7.5W49–065.0W49–0UY
Sat 10/15Texas vs Iowa State-15.5W24–2148.5W24–21UN
Sat 10/22Texas at Oklahoma State-6.5L34–4158.5L34–41ON
— Bye Week —
Sat 11/5Texas at Kansas State-3.0W34–2754.5W34–27OY
Sat 11/12Texas vs TCU-7.5L10–1765.0L10–17UN
Sat 11/19Texas at Kansas-9.0W55–1463.5W55–14OY
Fri 11/25Texas vs Baylor-10.0W38–2755.0W38–27OY
Thu 12/29Texas vs Washington-3.0L20–2767.0L20–27UN
Washington 2022 Schedule
Washington's 2022 Schedule
DateMatchupSpreadTotalResultO/UCover
Sat 9/3Washington vs Kent State-23.5W45–2061.5W45–20OY
Sat 9/10Washington vs Portland State-31.0W52–655.0W52–6OY
Sat 9/17Washington vs Michigan State-3.5W39–2856.5W39–28OY
Sat 9/24Washington vs Stanford-14.0W40–2262.5W40–22UY
Fri 9/30Washington at UCLA-2.5L32–4065.0L32–40ON
Sat 10/8Washington at Arizona State-13.5L38–4556.0L38–45ON
Sat 10/15Washington vs Arizona-14.5W49–3971.5W49–39ON
Sat 10/22Washington at California-7.5W28–2154.5W28–21UN
— Bye Week —
Fri 11/4Washington vs Oregon State-4.5W24–2153.5W24–21UN
Sat 11/12Washington at Oregon+12.0W37–3473.0W37–34UY
Sat 11/19Washington vs Colorado-30.5W54–761.5W54–7UY
Sat 11/26Washington at Washington State-2.0W51–3360.0W51–33OY
Thu 12/29Washington vs Texas+3.0W27–2067.0W27–20UY
Advanced Stats
Advanced Analytics Matchup
Matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense) · 2022 season
Texas PPA Edge
Agreement Signals — When All Metrics Agree
Elite · 83.1% ATS
PPA + PPO + SR + Havoc
All 4 Agree
→ Texas
Elite · 82.4% ATS
PPA + PPO + Havoc
3 Agree
→ Texas
Elite · 73.9% ATS
PPA + Success Rate
Both Agree
→ Texas
Individual Factors — Ranked by Predictive Strength
PPA Overall
Points added per play · Elite predictor
Texas
+0.521
Washington
+0.507
Texas Edge
PPA Passing
Pass efficiency edge · Strong predictor
Texas
+0.702
Washington
+0.649
Texas Edge
Havoc Total
Def. disruption rate · Strong predictor
Texas
0.173
Washington
0.141
TFLs, sacks, PBUs, forced fumbles — higher is better
Texas Edge
Points Per Opp
Drive-finishing edge · Strong predictor
Texas
+8.490
Washington
+7.884
Texas Edge
Success Rate
Play consistency edge · Solid predictor
Texas
+0.926
Washington
+0.902
Texas Edge
Field Position
Avg start (lower=better) · Solid predictor
Texas
69.6
Washington
69.8
Avg yards from own endzone to average start — lower is better · longer bar = better field position
Texas Edge
Advanced stats sourced from CFBD · 2022 season · Edges are matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense)
Power Ratings
Team Power Ratings
Overall · Offense · Defense ratings · Updated as season progresses
Texas Rated Higher
Overall Power Rating
Texas
27.2
Washington
17.4
Offense Rating
Texas
29.5
Washington
24.6
Defense Rating (lower = better defense)
Texas
2.3
Washington
7.1
Power ratings updated throughout the season as results accumulate
Momentum Control (CSS)
Consecutive Scoring Sequences Who builds scoring momentum? Texas Edge
Avg sequences created per game
Texas #6
2.25
Washington #16
1.82
Avg sequences allowed per game (lower is better)
Texas #5
0.25
Washington #25
0.55
Texas +0.43
CSS Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 61.3% of games historically
Based on 11 games this season
Game Control (GC)
Win Probability Dominance Who controls games start to finish? Texas Edge
Avg GC score per game (offense)
Texas #1
71.4
Washington #1
68.1
Avg GC score allowed per game (lower is better)
Texas #10
14.8
Washington #11
20.2
Texas +3.3
GC Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 49.4% of games historically
Based on 12 games this season
Actual Result
CSS Battle
Tie
1 — 1 sequences
✗ Predicted incorrectly
GC Battle
Washington
70.9 — 11.8 GC score
✗ Predicted incorrectly
Game Result
Washington won by 7
✗ Model missed it
Spread Context
ATS Historical Context
Based on 2021–2025 backtest · FBS vs FBS · Regular season

Both metrics agree on Texas, but the GC edge is small. When metrics agree but GC is near-neutral, the agreed-upon team has covered only 46.7% of the time historically (n=224) — potentially a fade signal.

ATS data is informational only. Past cover rates do not guarantee future results.

Coaching Matchup
Texas
Steve Sarkisian #1
5–7 (42%) · Yr 2 at school
OC Kyle Flood Yr 2 #1
DC Pete Kwiatkowski Yr 1 #1
Staff Rating
0.00 #1
Washington
Kalen DeBoer #1
0–0 (0%) · Yr 1 at school
OC Ryan Grubb Yr 1 #1
DC William Inge Yr 1 #1
Staff Rating
0.00 #1
About these metrics
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games.

Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: CSS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set.

Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: GS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set.

Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself