Sat, Sep 10 2022
·
Week 2
·
🏟 Camp Randall Stadium
Madison, WI
·
Turf
·
80,321 cap
Washington State✈ 1,373 mi+2 hr TZ
Matchup Prediction
Toss-up — no clear edge
Neither metric shows a meaningful pre-game edge in this matchup.
Momentum Control
58.4%
—
Lean
Game Control
67.1%
Wisconsin wins
Solid
Vegas Spread
Wisconsin -17.5
O/U 48.5
teamrankings
Advanced Stats
All 4 factors agree → Wisconsin
· 83.1% ATS historically when all four align
↓ See full breakdown
Washington State 2022 Schedule
Washington State's 2022 Schedule
| Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 9/3 | Washington State vs Idaho | -28.5W24–17 | 63.5 | W24–17 | U | N |
| Sat 9/10 | Washington State at Wisconsin | +17.5W17–14 | 48.5 | W17–14 | U | Y |
| Sat 9/17 | Washington State vs Colorado State | -17.0W38–7 | 51.5 | W38–7 | U | Y |
| Sat 9/24 | Washington State vs Oregon | +6.0L41–44 | 57.0 | L41–44 | O | Y |
| Sat 10/1 | Washington State vs California | -4.0W28–9 | 52.5 | W28–9 | U | Y |
| Sat 10/8 | Washington State at USC | +12.5L14–30 | 64.5 | L14–30 | U | N |
| Sat 10/15 | Washington State at Oregon State | +3.0L10–24 | 51.5 | L10–24 | U | N |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Thu 10/27 | Washington State vs Utah | +7.5L17–21 | 56.5 | L17–21 | U | Y |
| Sat 11/5 | Washington State at Stanford | -3.0W52–14 | 48.5 | W52–14 | O | Y |
| Sat 11/12 | Washington State vs Arizona State | -9.5W28–18 | 59.5 | W28–18 | U | Y |
| Sat 11/19 | Washington State at Arizona | -4.0W31–20 | 63.0 | W31–20 | U | Y |
| Sat 11/26 | Washington State vs Washington | +2.0L33–51 | 60.0 | L33–51 | O | N |
| Sat 12/17 | Washington State vs Fresno State | +5.5L6–29 | 54.0 | L6–29 | U | N |
Wisconsin 2022 Schedule
Wisconsin's 2022 Schedule
| Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 9/3 | Wisconsin vs Illinois State | -36.5W38–0 | 42.5 | W38–0 | U | Y |
| Sat 9/10 | Wisconsin vs Washington State | -17.5L14–17 | 48.5 | L14–17 | U | N |
| Sat 9/17 | Wisconsin vs New Mexico State | -38.0W66–7 | 45.5 | W66–7 | O | Y |
| Sat 9/24 | Wisconsin at Ohio State | +19.0L21–52 | 56.5 | L21–52 | O | N |
| Sat 10/1 | Wisconsin vs Illinois | -6.5L10–34 | 43.0 | L10–34 | O | N |
| Sat 10/8 | Wisconsin at Northwestern | -10.0W42–7 | 44.5 | W42–7 | O | Y |
| Sat 10/15 | Wisconsin at Michigan State | -7.0L28–34 | 49.5 | L28–34 | O | N |
| Sat 10/22 | Wisconsin vs Purdue | -1.5W35–24 | 51.5 | W35–24 | O | Y |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Sat 11/5 | Wisconsin vs Maryland | -5.0W23–10 | 47.5 | W23–10 | U | Y |
| Sat 11/12 | Wisconsin at Iowa | +1.0L10–24 | 35.5 | L10–24 | U | N |
| Sat 11/19 | Wisconsin at Nebraska | -10.0W15–14 | 40.5 | W15–14 | U | N |
| Sat 11/26 | Wisconsin vs Minnesota | -3.0L16–23 | 37.0 | L16–23 | O | N |
| Tue 12/27 | Wisconsin vs Oklahoma State | -5.0W24–17 | 45.0 | W24–17 | U | Y |
Advanced Stats
Advanced Analytics Matchup
Matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense) ·
2022 season
Agreement Signals — When All Metrics Agree
Elite · 83.1% ATS
PPA + PPO + SR + Havoc
All 4 Agree
→ Wisconsin
Elite · 82.4% ATS
PPA + PPO + Havoc
3 Agree
→ Wisconsin
Elite · 73.9% ATS
PPA + Success Rate
Both Agree
→ Wisconsin
Individual Factors — Ranked by Predictive Strength
PPA Overall
Points added per play · Elite predictor
PPA Passing
Pass efficiency edge · Strong predictor
Havoc Total
Def. disruption rate · Strong predictor
TFLs, sacks, PBUs, forced fumbles — higher is better
Points Per Opp
Drive-finishing edge · Strong predictor
Success Rate
Play consistency edge · Solid predictor
Field Position
Avg start (lower=better) · Solid predictor
Avg yards from own endzone to average start — lower is better · longer bar = better field position
Advanced stats sourced from CFBD · 2022 season ·
Edges are matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense)
Power Ratings
Team Power Ratings
Overall · Offense · Defense ratings · Updated as season progresses
Power ratings updated throughout the season as results accumulate
Momentum Control (CSS)
Consecutive Scoring Sequences
Who builds scoring momentum?
Washington State Edge
Washington State +0.00
CSS Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 58.4% of games historically
Based on 0 games this season
Game Control (GC)
Win Probability Dominance
Who controls games start to finish?
Wisconsin Edge
Wisconsin +17.7
GC Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 67.1% of games historically
Based on 1 game this season
Spread Context
ATS Historical Context
Based on 2021–2025 backtest · FBS vs FBS · Regular season
Both metrics agree on Wisconsin with a solid GC edge. Teams with this profile have covered 53.0% of the time historically (n=330) — a mild lean.
ATS data is informational only. Past cover rates do not guarantee future results.
Coaching Matchup
Washington State
Jake Dickert #1
3–3 (50%)
· Yr 2 at school
OC
Eric Morris
Yr 1
#1
DC
Brian Ward
Yr 1
#1
Wisconsin
Paul Chryst #1
65–23 (74%)
· Yr 8 at school
OC
Bobby Engram
Yr 1
#1
DC
Jim Leonhard
Yr 2
#1
About these metrics
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games. ✓
Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: Momentum Control is a great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: Game Control is another great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself ✓
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games. ✓
Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: Momentum Control is a great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: Game Control is another great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself ✓