Matchup Prediction
Ole Miss
has the edge in this matchup
Both Momentum Control (CSS) and Game Control metrics favor
Ole Miss entering this game.
Momentum Control
78.1%
Ole Miss wins
Strong
Game Control
67.1%
Ole Miss wins
Solid
Vegas Spread
Ole Miss -6.5
O/U 55.0
teamrankings
Advanced Stats
All 4 factors agree → Ole Miss
· 83.1% ATS historically when all four align
↓ See full breakdown
Kentucky 2022 Schedule
Kentucky's 2022 Schedule
| Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 9/3 | Kentucky vs Miami (OH) | -15.0W37–13 | 55.0 | W37–13 | U | Y |
| Sat 9/10 | Kentucky at Florida | +6.0W26–16 | 53.0 | W26–16 | U | Y |
| Sat 9/17 | Kentucky vs Youngstown State | -30.0W31–0 | 49.5 | W31–0 | U | Y |
| Sat 9/24 | Kentucky vs Northern Illinois | -27.0W31–23 | 52.5 | W31–23 | O | N |
| Sat 10/1 | Kentucky at Ole Miss | +6.5L19–22 | 55.0 | L19–22 | U | Y |
| Sat 10/8 | Kentucky vs South Carolina | -4.0L14–24 | 45.0 | L14–24 | U | N |
| Sat 10/15 | Kentucky vs Mississippi State | +3.5W27–17 | 50.5 | W27–17 | U | Y |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Sat 10/29 | Kentucky at Tennessee | +10.5L6–44 | 62.5 | L6–44 | U | N |
| Sat 11/5 | Kentucky at Missouri | +1.0W21–17 | 40.0 | W21–17 | U | Y |
| Sat 11/12 | Kentucky vs Vanderbilt | -17.0L21–24 | 45.5 | L21–24 | U | N |
| Sat 11/19 | Kentucky vs Georgia | +22.5L6–16 | 47.5 | L6–16 | U | Y |
| Sat 11/26 | Kentucky vs Louisville | -3.5W26–13 | 42.5 | W26–13 | U | Y |
| Sat 12/31 | Kentucky vs Iowa | +3.0L0–21 | 31.5 | L0–21 | U | N |
Ole Miss 2022 Schedule
Ole Miss's 2022 Schedule
| Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 9/3 | Ole Miss vs Troy | -21.5W28–10 | 56.5 | W28–10 | U | N |
| Sat 9/10 | Ole Miss vs Central Arkansas | -36.5W59–3 | 61.0 | W59–3 | O | Y |
| Sat 9/17 | Ole Miss at Georgia Tech | -17.0W42–0 | 63.0 | W42–0 | U | Y |
| Sat 9/24 | Ole Miss vs Tulsa | -21.0W35–27 | 66.5 | W35–27 | U | N |
| Sat 10/1 | Ole Miss vs Kentucky | -6.5W22–19 | 55.0 | W22–19 | U | N |
| Sat 10/8 | Ole Miss at Vanderbilt | -17.0W52–28 | 59.5 | W52–28 | O | Y |
| Sat 10/15 | Ole Miss vs Auburn | -15.5W48–34 | 55.5 | W48–34 | O | N |
| Sat 10/22 | Ole Miss at LSU | +0.0L20–45 | 64.0 | L20–45 | O | N |
| Sat 10/29 | Ole Miss at Texas A&M | -3.0W31–28 | 55.5 | W31–28 | O | N |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Sat 11/12 | Ole Miss vs Alabama | +11.0L24–30 | 65.5 | L24–30 | U | Y |
| Sat 11/19 | Ole Miss at Arkansas | +0.0L27–42 | 67.5 | L27–42 | O | N |
| Thu 11/24 | Ole Miss vs Mississippi State | -2.5L22–24 | 63.0 | L22–24 | U | N |
| Wed 12/28 | Ole Miss vs Texas Tech | -4.5L25–42 | 73.0 | L25–42 | U | N |
Advanced Stats
Advanced Analytics Matchup
Matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense) ·
2022 season
Agreement Signals — When All Metrics Agree
Elite · 83.1% ATS
PPA + PPO + SR + Havoc
All 4 Agree
→ Ole Miss
Elite · 82.4% ATS
PPA + PPO + Havoc
3 Agree
→ Ole Miss
Elite · 73.9% ATS
PPA + Success Rate
Both Agree
→ Ole Miss
Individual Factors — Ranked by Predictive Strength
PPA Overall
Points added per play · Elite predictor
PPA Passing
Pass efficiency edge · Strong predictor
Havoc Total
Def. disruption rate · Strong predictor
TFLs, sacks, PBUs, forced fumbles — higher is better
Points Per Opp
Drive-finishing edge · Strong predictor
Success Rate
Play consistency edge · Solid predictor
Field Position
Avg start (lower=better) · Solid predictor
Avg yards from own endzone to average start — lower is better · longer bar = better field position
Advanced stats sourced from CFBD · 2022 season ·
Edges are matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense)
Power Ratings
Team Power Ratings
Overall · Offense · Defense ratings · Updated as season progresses
Power ratings updated throughout the season as results accumulate
Momentum Control (CSS)
Consecutive Scoring Sequences
Who builds scoring momentum?
Ole Miss Edge
Ole Miss +2.42
CSS Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 78.1% of games historically
Based on 4 games this season
Game Control (GC)
Win Probability Dominance
Who controls games start to finish?
Ole Miss Edge
Ole Miss +18.4
GC Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 67.1% of games historically
Based on 4 games this season
Actual Result
CSS Battle
Ole Miss
1 — 0 sequences
✓ Predicted correctly
GC Battle
Ole Miss
86.0 — 8.2 GC score
✓ Predicted correctly
Game Result
Ole Miss won by 3
✓ Model called it
Spread Context
ATS Historical Context
Based on 2021–2025 backtest · FBS vs FBS · Regular season
Both metrics agree on Ole Miss with a solid GC edge. Teams with this profile have covered 53.0% of the time historically (n=330) — a mild lean.
ATS data is informational only. Past cover rates do not guarantee future results.
Coaching Matchup
Kentucky
Mark Stoops #1
59–53 (53%)
· Yr 10 at school
OC
Rich Scangarello
Yr 1
#1
DC
Brad White
Yr 2
#1
Ole Miss
Lane Kiffin #1
15–8 (65%)
· Yr 3 at school
OC
Charlie Weis Jr.
Yr 1
#1
DC
Maurice Crum Jr.
Yr 1
#1
About these metrics
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games. ✓
Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: CSS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: GS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself ✓
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games. ✓
Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: CSS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: GS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself ✓