Wed, Dec 22 2021
·
Postseason
·
Neutral Site
·
🏟 Toyota Stadium
Frisco, TX
·
Turf
·
20,500 cap
UTSA✈ 275 miSame TZ
San Diego State✈ 1,174 mi+2 hr TZ
Matchup Prediction
UTSA
has the edge in this matchup
Both Momentum Control (CSS) and Game Control metrics favor
UTSA entering this game.
Momentum Control
73.7%
UTSA wins
Solid
Game Control
49.4%
UTSA wins
Toss-up
Vegas Spread
San Diego State -3
O/U 48.0
Bovada
Advanced Stats
PPA + Success Rate agree → San Diego State
· 73.9% ATS historically
↓ See full breakdown
UTSA 2021 Schedule
UTSA's 2021 Schedule
| Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 9/4 | UTSA at Illinois | +4.5W37–30 | 52.0 | W37–30 | O | Y |
| Sat 9/11 | UTSA vs Lamar | -38.0W54–0 | 65.0 | W54–0 | U | Y |
| Sat 9/18 | UTSA vs Middle Tennessee | -11.5W27–13 | 60.0 | W27–13 | U | Y |
| Sat 9/25 | UTSA at Memphis | +3.0W31–28 | 66.5 | W31–28 | U | Y |
| Sat 10/2 | UTSA vs UNLV | -21.5W24–17 | 55.5 | W24–17 | U | N |
| Sat 10/9 | UTSA at Western Kentucky | +3.5W52–46 | 71.0 | W52–46 | O | Y |
| Sat 10/16 | UTSA vs Rice | -17.0W45–0 | 53.0 | W45–0 | U | Y |
| Sat 10/23 | UTSA at Louisiana Tech | -5.5W45–16 | 59.5 | W45–16 | O | Y |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Sat 11/6 | UTSA at UTEP | -12.0W44–23 | 53.5 | W44–23 | O | Y |
| Sat 11/13 | UTSA vs Southern Miss | -32.5W27–17 | 54.0 | W27–17 | U | N |
| Sat 11/20 | UTSA vs UAB | -3.5W34–31 | 54.0 | W34–31 | O | N |
| Sat 11/27 | UTSA at North Texas | -8.5L23–45 | 60.0 | L23–45 | O | N |
| Fri 12/3 | UTSA vs Western Kentucky | +3.0W49–41 | 74.5 | W49–41 | O | Y |
| Tue 12/21 | UTSA vs San Diego State | +3.0L24–38 | 48.0 | L24–38 | O | N |
San Diego State 2021 Schedule
San Diego State's 2021 Schedule
| Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 9/4 | San Diego State vs New Mexico State | -31.0W28–10 | 51.0 | W28–10 | U | N |
| Sat 9/11 | San Diego State at Arizona | +1.5W38–14 | 46.0 | W38–14 | O | Y |
| Sat 9/18 | San Diego State vs Utah | +8.0W33–31 | 42.5 | W33–31 | O | Y |
| Sat 9/25 | San Diego State vs Towson | -23.0W48–21 | 41.0 | W48–21 | O | Y |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Sat 10/9 | San Diego State vs New Mexico | -19.5W31–7 | 42.5 | W31–7 | U | Y |
| Fri 10/15 | San Diego State at San José State | -10.0W19–13 | 41.0 | W19–13 | U | N |
| Sat 10/23 | San Diego State at Air Force | +3.0W20–14 | 38.5 | W20–14 | U | Y |
| Sat 10/30 | San Diego State vs Fresno State | +2.0L20–30 | 43.5 | L20–30 | O | N |
| Sat 11/6 | San Diego State at Hawai'i | -7.0W17–10 | 45.0 | W17–10 | U | N |
| Sat 11/13 | San Diego State vs Nevada | -2.5W23–21 | 45.0 | W23–21 | U | N |
| Fri 11/19 | San Diego State at UNLV | -11.0W28–20 | 41.0 | W28–20 | O | N |
| Fri 11/26 | San Diego State vs Boise State | +3.0W27–16 | 44.0 | W27–16 | U | Y |
| Sat 12/4 | San Diego State vs Utah State | -6.5L13–46 | 49.5 | L13–46 | O | N |
| Tue 12/21 | San Diego State vs UTSA | -3.0W38–24 | 48.0 | W38–24 | O | Y |
Advanced Stats
Advanced Analytics Matchup
Matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense) ·
2021 season
Agreement Signals — When All Metrics Agree
Elite · 83.1% ATS
PPA + PPO + SR + Havoc
Split
Metrics disagree
Elite · 82.4% ATS
PPA + PPO + Havoc
Split
Metrics disagree
Elite · 73.9% ATS
PPA + Success Rate
Both Agree
→ San Diego State
Individual Factors — Ranked by Predictive Strength
PPA Overall
Points added per play · Elite predictor
PPA Passing
Pass efficiency edge · Strong predictor
Havoc Total
Def. disruption rate · Strong predictor
TFLs, sacks, PBUs, forced fumbles — higher is better
Points Per Opp
Drive-finishing edge · Strong predictor
Success Rate
Play consistency edge · Solid predictor
Field Position
Avg start (lower=better) · Solid predictor
Avg yards from own endzone to average start — lower is better · longer bar = better field position
Advanced stats sourced from CFBD · 2021 season ·
Edges are matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense)
Power Ratings
Team Power Ratings
Overall · Offense · Defense ratings · Updated as season progresses
Power ratings updated throughout the season as results accumulate
Momentum Control (CSS)
Consecutive Scoring Sequences
Who builds scoring momentum?
UTSA Edge
UTSA +1.02
CSS Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 73.7% of games historically
Based on 12 games this season
Game Control (GC)
Win Probability Dominance
Who controls games start to finish?
UTSA Edge
UTSA +1.6
GC Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 49.4% of games historically
Based on 13 games this season
Spread Context
ATS Historical Context
Based on 2021–2025 backtest · FBS vs FBS · Regular season
Both metrics agree on UTSA, but the GC edge is small. When metrics agree but GC is near-neutral, the agreed-upon team has covered only 46.7% of the time historically (n=224) — potentially a fade signal.
ATS data is informational only. Past cover rates do not guarantee future results.
Coaching Matchup
UTSA
Jeff Traylor #1
10–5 (67%)
· Yr 2 at school
OC
Barry Lunney Jr.
Yr 1
#1
DC
Jess Loepp / Rod Wright
Yr 1
#1
San Diego State
Brady Hoke #1
7–4 (64%)
· Yr 2 at school
OC
Jeff Hecklinski
Yr 1
#1
DC
Kurt Mattix
Yr 1
#1
About these metrics
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games. ✓
Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: Momentum Control is a great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: Game Control is another great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself ✓
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games. ✓
Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: Momentum Control is a great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: Game Control is another great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself ✓

