Tue, Nov 2 2021
·
Week 10
·
🏟 Glass Bowl
Toledo, OH
·
Turf
·
26,248 cap
Matchup Prediction
Metrics disagree on this matchup
Momentum Control favors Eastern Michigan,
while Game Control favors Toledo.
Split signals historically show weaker predictive confidence — treat as a toss-up.
⚡ Split Signal — Metrics Disagree
Momentum Control
61.3%
Eastern Michigan wins
Lean
Game Control
50.6%
Toledo wins
Toss-up
Vegas Spread
Toledo -9
O/U 54.5
teamrankings
Advanced Stats
All 4 factors agree → Toledo
· 83.1% ATS historically when all four align
↓ See full breakdown
Eastern Michigan 2021 Schedule
Eastern Michigan's 2021 Schedule
| Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 9/3 | Eastern Michigan vs St. Francis (PA) | -34.0W35–15 | 54.5 | W35–15 | U | N |
| Sat 9/11 | Eastern Michigan at Wisconsin | +26.0L7–34 | 52.0 | L7–34 | U | N |
| Sat 9/18 | Eastern Michigan at Massachusetts | -22.0W42–28 | 56.5 | W42–28 | O | N |
| Sat 9/25 | Eastern Michigan vs Texas State | -7.5W59–21 | 62.0 | W59–21 | O | Y |
| Sat 10/2 | Eastern Michigan at Northern Illinois | +0.0L20–27 | 62.5 | L20–27 | U | N |
| Sat 10/9 | Eastern Michigan vs Miami (OH) | +2.5W13–12 | 58.0 | W13–12 | U | Y |
| Sat 10/16 | Eastern Michigan vs Ball State | +1.5L31–38 | 54.5 | L31–38 | O | N |
| Sat 10/23 | Eastern Michigan at Bowling Green | -4.5W55–24 | 49.5 | W55–24 | O | Y |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Tue 11/2 | Eastern Michigan at Toledo | +9.0W52–49 | 54.5 | W52–49 | O | Y |
| Tue 11/9 | Eastern Michigan vs Ohio | -6.0L26–34 | 61.5 | L26–34 | U | N |
| Tue 11/16 | Eastern Michigan vs Western Michigan | +6.0W22–21 | 66.0 | W22–21 | U | Y |
| Fri 11/26 | Eastern Michigan at Central Michigan | +8.5L10–31 | 64.0 | L10–31 | U | N |
| Sat 12/18 | Eastern Michigan vs Liberty | +9.5L20–56 | 58.5 | L20–56 | O | N |
Toledo 2021 Schedule
Toledo's 2021 Schedule
| Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 9/4 | Toledo vs Norfolk State | -39.5W49–10 | 56.0 | W49–10 | O | N |
| Sat 9/11 | Toledo at Notre Dame | +16.5L29–32 | 55.0 | L29–32 | O | Y |
| Sat 9/18 | Toledo vs Colorado State | -14.5L6–22 | 59.0 | L6–22 | U | N |
| Sat 9/25 | Toledo at Ball State | -4.5W22–12 | 56.5 | W22–12 | U | Y |
| Sat 10/2 | Toledo at Massachusetts | -26.5W45–7 | 56.5 | W45–7 | U | Y |
| Sat 10/9 | Toledo vs Northern Illinois | -13.0L20–22 | 51.5 | L20–22 | U | N |
| Sat 10/16 | Toledo at Central Michigan | -5.0L23–26 | 53.0 | L23–26 | U | N |
| Sat 10/23 | Toledo vs Western Michigan | +1.5W34–15 | 54.5 | W34–15 | U | Y |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Tue 11/2 | Toledo vs Eastern Michigan | -9.0L49–52 | 54.5 | L49–52 | O | N |
| Wed 11/10 | Toledo at Bowling Green | -10.5W49–17 | 50.0 | W49–17 | O | Y |
| Tue 11/16 | Toledo at Ohio | -7.5W35–23 | 57.5 | W35–23 | O | Y |
| Sat 11/27 | Toledo vs Akron | -28.5W49–14 | 57.5 | W49–14 | O | Y |
| Fri 12/17 | Toledo vs Middle Tennessee | -10.0L24–31 | 50.0 | L24–31 | O | N |
Advanced Stats
Advanced Analytics Matchup
Matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense) ·
2021 season
Agreement Signals — When All Metrics Agree
Elite · 83.1% ATS
PPA + PPO + SR + Havoc
All 4 Agree
→ Toledo
Elite · 82.4% ATS
PPA + PPO + Havoc
3 Agree
→ Toledo
Elite · 73.9% ATS
PPA + Success Rate
Both Agree
→ Toledo
Individual Factors — Ranked by Predictive Strength
PPA Overall
Points added per play · Elite predictor
PPA Passing
Pass efficiency edge · Strong predictor
Havoc Total
Def. disruption rate · Strong predictor
TFLs, sacks, PBUs, forced fumbles — higher is better
Points Per Opp
Drive-finishing edge · Strong predictor
Success Rate
Play consistency edge · Solid predictor
Field Position
Avg start (lower=better) · Solid predictor
Avg yards from own endzone to average start — lower is better · longer bar = better field position
Advanced stats sourced from CFBD · 2021 season ·
Edges are matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense)
Power Ratings
Team Power Ratings
Overall · Offense · Defense ratings · Updated as season progresses
Power ratings updated throughout the season as results accumulate
Momentum Control (CSS)
Consecutive Scoring Sequences
Who builds scoring momentum?
Eastern Michigan Edge
Eastern Michigan +0.43
CSS Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 61.3% of games historically
Based on 7 games this season
Game Control (GC)
Win Probability Dominance
Who controls games start to finish?
Toledo Edge
Toledo +4.7
GC Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 50.6% of games historically
Based on 8 games this season
Actual Result
CSS Battle
Eastern Michigan
1 — 2 sequences
✓ Predicted correctly
GC Battle
Toledo
47.4 — 41.2 GC score
✓ Predicted correctly
Game Result
Eastern Michigan won by 3
Spread Context
ATS Historical Context
Based on 2021–2025 backtest · FBS vs FBS · Regular season
CSS and GC disagree on this matchup. When the metrics split, historical cover rates are essentially random — treat this as a coin flip against the spread.
ATS data is informational only. Past cover rates do not guarantee future results.
Coaching Matchup
Eastern Michigan
Chris Creighton #1
32–52 (38%)
· Yr 8 at school
OC
Chris Creighton
Yr 1
#1
DC
Neal Neathery
Yr 1
#1
Toledo
Jason Candle #1
39–23 (63%)
· Yr 6 at school
OC
Mike Hallett
Yr 1
#1
DC
Vince Kehres
Yr 1
#1
About these metrics
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games. ✓
Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: CSS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: GS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself ✓
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games. ✓
Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: CSS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: GS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself ✓