SMU at Cincinnati Week 12 College Football Matchup SMU at Cincinnati Matchup - Week 12
Sat, Nov 20 2021 · Week 12 · 🏟 Nippert Stadium Cincinnati, OH · Turf · 40,000 cap
SMU✈ 810 mi+1 hr TZ
Away
14 48
Final
Home
📊 Punt & Rally Projection
SMU
24
CIN -9.5
Cincinnati
39
P&R Line Cincinnati -15
P&R Total O/U 63.5
Confidence 90 High
Vegas Cincinnati -9.5 · O/U 65.5
Matchup Prediction
Cincinnati has the edge in this matchup
Both Momentum Control (CSS) and Game Control metrics favor Cincinnati entering this game.
Momentum Control
58.4%
Cincinnati wins
Lean
Game Control
67.1%
Cincinnati wins
Solid
Vegas Spread
Cincinnati -9.5
O/U 65.5
teamrankings
Advanced Stats
All 4 factors agree → Cincinnati · 83.1% ATS historically when all four align
↓ See full breakdown
SMU 2021 Schedule
SMU's 2021 Schedule
DateMatchupSpreadTotalResultO/UCover
Sat 9/4SMU vs Abilene Christian-32.0W56–966.0W56–9UY
Sat 9/11SMU vs North Texas-22.5W35–1275.5W35–12UY
Sat 9/18SMU at Louisiana Tech-11.0W39–3765.0W39–37ON
Sat 9/25SMU at TCU+8.0W42–3466.0W42–34OY
Sat 10/2SMU vs South Florida-21.5W41–1768.5W41–17UY
Sat 10/9SMU at Navy-13.5W31–2457.0W31–24UN
— Bye Week —
Thu 10/21SMU vs Tulane-14.0W55–2670.5W55–26OY
Sat 10/30SMU at Houston-1.0L37–4461.5L37–44ON
Sat 11/6SMU at Memphis-3.5L25–2872.0L25–28UN
Sat 11/13SMU vs UCF-7.0W55–2861.5W55–28OY
Sat 11/20SMU at Cincinnati+9.5L14–4865.5L14–48UN
Sat 11/27SMU vs Tulsa-6.0L31–3463.0L31–34ON
Wed 12/29SMU vs Virginia+2.571.0
Cincinnati 2021 Schedule
Cincinnati's 2021 Schedule
DateMatchupSpreadTotalResultO/UCover
Sat 9/4Cincinnati vs Miami (OH)-22.5W49–1449.0W49–14OY
Sat 9/11Cincinnati vs Murray State-36.5W42–751.5W42–7UN
Sat 9/18Cincinnati at Indiana-4.0W38–2450.0W38–24OY
— Bye Week —
Sat 10/2Cincinnati at Notre Dame-2.5W24–1350.0W24–13UY
Fri 10/8Cincinnati vs Temple-30.0W52–352.5W52–3OY
Sat 10/16Cincinnati vs UCF-21.5W56–2156.0W56–21OY
Sat 10/23Cincinnati at Navy-28.5W27–2049.5W27–20UN
Sat 10/30Cincinnati at Tulane-27.5W31–1261.5W31–12UN
Sat 11/6Cincinnati vs Tulsa-22.5W28–2056.0W28–20UN
Fri 11/12Cincinnati at South Florida-24.5W45–2858.5W45–28ON
Sat 11/20Cincinnati vs SMU-9.5W48–1465.5W48–14UY
Fri 11/26Cincinnati at East Carolina-14.5W35–1356.5W35–13UY
Sat 12/4Cincinnati vs Houston-10.5W35–2052.5W35–20OY
Fri 12/31Cincinnati vs Alabama+13.0L6–2757.5L6–27UN
Advanced Stats
Advanced Analytics Matchup
Matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense) · 2021 season
Cincinnati PPA Edge
Agreement Signals — When All Metrics Agree
Elite · 83.1% ATS
PPA + PPO + SR + Havoc
All 4 Agree
→ Cincinnati
Elite · 82.4% ATS
PPA + PPO + Havoc
3 Agree
→ Cincinnati
Elite · 73.9% ATS
PPA + Success Rate
Both Agree
→ Cincinnati
Individual Factors — Ranked by Predictive Strength
PPA Overall
Points added per play · Elite predictor
SMU
+0.404
Cincinnati
+0.562
Cincinnati Edge
PPA Passing
Pass efficiency edge · Strong predictor
SMU
+0.594
Cincinnati
+0.776
Cincinnati Edge
Havoc Total
Def. disruption rate · Strong predictor
SMU
0.164
Cincinnati
0.203
TFLs, sacks, PBUs, forced fumbles — higher is better
Cincinnati Edge
Points Per Opp
Drive-finishing edge · Strong predictor
SMU
+7.280
Cincinnati
+8.773
Cincinnati Edge
Success Rate
Play consistency edge · Solid predictor
SMU
+0.858
Cincinnati
+0.876
Cincinnati Edge
Field Position
Avg start (lower=better) · Solid predictor
SMU
67.8
Cincinnati
66.1
Avg yards from own endzone to average start — lower is better · longer bar = better field position
Cincinnati Edge
Advanced stats sourced from CFBD · 2021 season · Edges are matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense)
Power Ratings
Team Power Ratings
Overall · Offense · Defense ratings · Updated as season progresses
SMU Rated Higher
Overall Power Rating
SMU
15.2
Cincinnati
-1.3
Offense Rating
SMU
25.0
Cincinnati
13.7
Defense Rating (lower = better defense)
SMU
9.8
Cincinnati
15.0
Power ratings updated throughout the season as results accumulate
Momentum Control (CSS)
Consecutive Scoring Sequences Who builds scoring momentum? Cincinnati Edge
Avg sequences created per game
SMU #6
1.90
Cincinnati #8
2.00
Avg sequences allowed per game (lower is better)
SMU #110
0.60
Cincinnati #13
0.40
Cincinnati +0.10
CSS Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 58.4% of games historically
Based on 10 games this season
Game Control (GC)
Win Probability Dominance Who controls games start to finish? Cincinnati Edge
Avg GC score per game (offense)
SMU #1
68.8
Cincinnati #1
84.4
Avg GC score allowed per game (lower is better)
SMU #27
17.4
Cincinnati #4
6.3
Cincinnati +15.6
GC Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 67.1% of games historically
Based on 10 games this season
Actual Result
CSS Battle
Cincinnati
4 — 1 sequences
✓ Predicted correctly
GC Battle
Cincinnati
97.8 — 1.6 GC score
✓ Predicted correctly
Game Result
Cincinnati won by 34
✓ Model called it
Spread Context
ATS Historical Context
Based on 2021–2025 backtest · FBS vs FBS · Regular season

Both metrics agree on Cincinnati with a solid GC edge. Teams with this profile have covered 53.0% of the time historically (n=330) — a mild lean.

ATS data is informational only. Past cover rates do not guarantee future results.

Coaching Matchup
SMU
Sonny Dykes #1
25–14 (64%) · Yr 4 at school
OC Garrett Riley Yr 1 #1
DC Jim Leavitt Yr 1 #1
Staff Rating
0.00 #1
Cincinnati
Luke Fickell #1
38–14 (73%) · Yr 5 at school
OC Mike Denbrock Yr 1 #1
DC Mike Tressel Yr 1 #1
Staff Rating
0.00 #1
About these metrics
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games.

Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: Momentum Control is a great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set.

Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: Game Control is another great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set.

Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself