South Florida at SMU Week 5 College Football Matchup South Florida at SMU Matchup - Week 5
Sat, Oct 2 2021 · Week 5 · 🏟 Gerald J. Ford Stadium University Park, TX · Turf · 32,000 cap
South Florida✈ 913 mi-1 hr TZ
17 41
Final
SMU
Home
📊 Punt & Rally Projection
South Florida
21
SMU -21.5
SMU
45
P&R Line SMU -23.5
P&R Total O/U 65.5
Confidence 90 High
Vegas SMU -21.5 · O/U 68.5
Matchup Prediction
Toss-up — no clear edge
Neither metric shows a meaningful pre-game edge in this matchup.
Momentum Control
58.4%
Lean
Game Control
76%
SMU wins
Strong
Vegas Spread
SMU -21.5
O/U 68.5
teamrankings
Advanced Stats
All 4 factors agree → SMU · 83.1% ATS historically when all four align
↓ See full breakdown
🚌 South Florida 2nd straight Road Game
South Florida 2021 Schedule
South Florida's 2021 Schedule
DateMatchupSpreadTotalResultO/UCover
Thu 9/2South Florida at NC State+20.0L0–4558.0L0–45UN
Sat 9/11South Florida vs Florida+29.0L20–4257.0L20–42OY
Sat 9/18South Florida vs Florida A&M-22.5W38–1750.0W38–17ON
Sat 9/25South Florida at BYU+23.5L27–3554.5L27–35OY
Sat 10/2South Florida at SMU+21.5L17–4168.5L17–41UN
— Bye Week —
Sat 10/16South Florida vs Tulsa+7.5L31–3256.0L31–32OY
Sat 10/23South Florida vs Temple-1.5W34–1454.5W34–14UY
Thu 10/28South Florida at East Carolina+9.5L14–2955.5L14–29UN
Sat 11/6South Florida vs Houston+13.5L42–5453.0L42–54OY
Fri 11/12South Florida vs Cincinnati+24.5L28–4558.5L28–45OY
Sat 11/20South Florida at Tulane+5.5L14–4559.5L14–45UN
Fri 11/26South Florida at UCF+17.0L13–1762.0L13–17UY
SMU 2021 Schedule
SMU's 2021 Schedule
DateMatchupSpreadTotalResultO/UCover
Sat 9/4SMU vs Abilene Christian-32.0W56–966.0W56–9UY
Sat 9/11SMU vs North Texas-22.5W35–1275.5W35–12UY
Sat 9/18SMU at Louisiana Tech-11.0W39–3765.0W39–37ON
Sat 9/25SMU at TCU+8.0W42–3466.0W42–34OY
Sat 10/2SMU vs South Florida-21.5W41–1768.5W41–17UY
Sat 10/9SMU at Navy-13.5W31–2457.0W31–24UN
— Bye Week —
Thu 10/21SMU vs Tulane-14.0W55–2670.5W55–26OY
Sat 10/30SMU at Houston-1.0L37–4461.5L37–44ON
Sat 11/6SMU at Memphis-3.5L25–2872.0L25–28UN
Sat 11/13SMU vs UCF-7.0W55–2861.5W55–28OY
Sat 11/20SMU at Cincinnati+9.5L14–4865.5L14–48UN
Sat 11/27SMU vs Tulsa-6.0L31–3463.0L31–34ON
Wed 12/29SMU vs Virginia+2.571.0
Advanced Stats
Advanced Analytics Matchup
Matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense) · 2021 season
SMU PPA Edge
Agreement Signals — When All Metrics Agree
Elite · 83.1% ATS
PPA + PPO + SR + Havoc
All 4 Agree
→ SMU
Elite · 82.4% ATS
PPA + PPO + Havoc
3 Agree
→ SMU
Elite · 73.9% ATS
PPA + Success Rate
Both Agree
→ SMU
Individual Factors — Ranked by Predictive Strength
PPA Overall
Points added per play · Elite predictor
South Florida
+0.407
SMU
+0.679
SMU Edge
PPA Passing
Pass efficiency edge · Strong predictor
South Florida
+0.630
SMU
+0.900
SMU Edge
Havoc Total
Def. disruption rate · Strong predictor
South Florida
0.123
SMU
0.164
TFLs, sacks, PBUs, forced fumbles — higher is better
SMU Edge
Points Per Opp
Drive-finishing edge · Strong predictor
South Florida
+7.637
SMU
+8.597
SMU Edge
Success Rate
Play consistency edge · Solid predictor
South Florida
+0.815
SMU
+0.965
SMU Edge
Field Position
Avg start (lower=better) · Solid predictor
South Florida
72.1
SMU
67.8
Avg yards from own endzone to average start — lower is better · longer bar = better field position
SMU Edge
Advanced stats sourced from CFBD · 2021 season · Edges are matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense)
Power Ratings
Team Power Ratings
Overall · Offense · Defense ratings · Updated as season progresses
SMU Rated Higher
Overall Power Rating
South Florida
1.9
SMU
15.2
Offense Rating
South Florida
18.7
SMU
25.0
Defense Rating (lower = better defense)
South Florida
16.8
SMU
9.8
Power ratings updated throughout the season as results accumulate
Momentum Control (CSS)
Consecutive Scoring Sequences Who builds scoring momentum?
Avg sequences created per game
South Florida #79
1.00
SMU #6
1.00
Avg sequences allowed per game (lower is better)
South Florida #130
2.33
SMU #110
0.25
South Florida +0.00
CSS Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 58.4% of games historically
Based on 4 games this season
Game Control (GC)
Win Probability Dominance Who controls games start to finish? SMU Edge
Avg GC score per game (offense)
South Florida #1
24.4
SMU #1
74.4
Avg GC score allowed per game (lower is better)
South Florida #118
74.0
SMU #27
13.8
SMU +50.0
GC Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 76% of games historically
Based on 4 games this season
Actual Result
CSS Battle
SMU
4 — 0 sequences
GC Battle
SMU
97.3 — 1.3 GC score
✓ Predicted correctly
Game Result
SMU won by 24
Spread Context
ATS Historical Context
Based on 2021–2025 backtest · FBS vs FBS · Regular season

Both metrics agree on SMU with a large edge. Historically, dominant teams like this are fully priced into the spread — the agreed-upon team covers just 50.2% of the time. The metrics predict game control better than they beat the number.

ATS data is informational only. Past cover rates do not guarantee future results.

Coaching Matchup
South Florida
Charlie Weis Jr. #1
2–10 (17%) · Yr 2 at school
OC Charlie Weis Jr. Yr 1 #1
DC Glenn Spencer Yr 1 #1
Staff Rating
0.00 #1
SMU
Sonny Dykes #1
25–14 (64%) · Yr 4 at school
OC Garrett Riley Yr 1 #1
DC Jim Leavitt Yr 1 #1
Staff Rating
0.00 #1
About these metrics
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games.

Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: Momentum Control is a great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set.

Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: Game Control is another great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set.

Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself