UL Monroe at Kentucky Week 1 College Football Matchup UL Monroe at Kentucky Matchup - Week 1
Sat, Sep 4 2021 · Week 1 · 🏟 Commonwealth Stadium Lexington, KY · Turf · 61,000 cap
UL Monroe✈ 570 mi+1 hr TZ
10 45
Final
Home
📊 Punt & Rally Projection
UL Monroe
11
Kentucky
43
P&R Line Kentucky -31.5
P&R Total O/U 54
Confidence 90 High
Vegas Kentucky -31 · O/U 54.0
Matchup Prediction
Toss-up — no clear edge
Neither metric shows a meaningful pre-game edge in this matchup.
Momentum Control
58.4%
Lean
Game Control
50.6%
Toss-up
Vegas Spread
Kentucky -31
O/U 54.0
teamrankings
Advanced Stats
All 4 factors agree → Kentucky · 83.1% ATS historically when all four align
↓ See full breakdown
UL Monroe 2021 Schedule
UL Monroe's 2021 Schedule
DateMatchupSpreadTotalResultO/UCover
Sat 9/4UL Monroe at Kentucky+31.0L10–4554.0L10–45ON
— Bye Week —
Sat 9/18UL Monroe vs Jackson State-4.5W12–752.0W12–7UY
Sat 9/25UL Monroe vs Troy+23.5W29–1649.5W29–16UY
Sat 10/2UL Monroe at Coastal Carolina+33.5L6–5957.5L6–59ON
Sat 10/9UL Monroe vs Georgia State+16.0L21–5549.5L21–55ON
Sat 10/16UL Monroe vs Liberty+32.5W31–2857.0W31–28OY
Sat 10/23UL Monroe vs South Alabama+13.5W41–3151.5W41–31OY
Sat 10/30UL Monroe at App State+26.5L28–5957.5L28–59ON
Sat 11/6UL Monroe at Texas State+3.0L19–2757.5L19–27UN
Sat 11/13UL Monroe vs Arkansas State-3.0L24–2766.5L24–27UN
Sat 11/20UL Monroe at LSU+29.0L14–2757.5L14–27UY
Sat 11/27UL Monroe at Louisiana+21.5L16–2156.0L16–21UY
Kentucky 2021 Schedule
Kentucky's 2021 Schedule
DateMatchupSpreadTotalResultO/UCover
Sat 9/4Kentucky vs UL Monroe-31.0W45–1054.0W45–10OY
Sat 9/11Kentucky vs Missouri-5.5W35–2856.5W35–28OY
Sat 9/18Kentucky vs Chattanooga-33.5W28–2348.0W28–23ON
Sat 9/25Kentucky at South Carolina-4.5W16–1049.0W16–10UY
Sat 10/2Kentucky vs Florida+7.5W20–1356.5W20–13UY
Sat 10/9Kentucky vs LSU-2.0W42–2150.5W42–21OY
Sat 10/16Kentucky at Georgia+21.5L13–3044.5L13–30UY
— Bye Week —
Sat 10/30Kentucky at Mississippi State+1.0L17–3147.0L17–31ON
Sat 11/6Kentucky vs Tennessee+1.0L42–4557.5L42–45ON
Sat 11/13Kentucky at Vanderbilt-21.5W34–1752.5W34–17UN
Sat 11/20Kentucky vs New Mexico State-35.5W56–1661.0W56–16OY
Sat 11/27Kentucky at Louisville+3.0W52–2158.0W52–21OY
Sat 1/1Kentucky vs Iowa-3.0W20–1743.5W20–17UN
Advanced Stats
Advanced Analytics Matchup
Matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense) · 2021 season
Kentucky PPA Edge
Agreement Signals — When All Metrics Agree
Elite · 83.1% ATS
PPA + PPO + SR + Havoc
All 4 Agree
→ Kentucky
Elite · 82.4% ATS
PPA + PPO + Havoc
3 Agree
→ Kentucky
Elite · 73.9% ATS
PPA + Success Rate
Both Agree
→ Kentucky
Individual Factors — Ranked by Predictive Strength
PPA Overall
Points added per play · Elite predictor
UL Monroe
+0.239
Kentucky
+0.523
Kentucky Edge
PPA Passing
Pass efficiency edge · Strong predictor
UL Monroe
+0.440
Kentucky
+0.702
Kentucky Edge
Havoc Total
Def. disruption rate · Strong predictor
UL Monroe
0.153
Kentucky
0.176
TFLs, sacks, PBUs, forced fumbles — higher is better
Kentucky Edge
Points Per Opp
Drive-finishing edge · Strong predictor
UL Monroe
+7.003
Kentucky
+9.214
Kentucky Edge
Success Rate
Play consistency edge · Solid predictor
UL Monroe
+0.774
Kentucky
+0.970
Kentucky Edge
Field Position
Avg start (lower=better) · Solid predictor
UL Monroe
71.6
Kentucky
72.3
Avg yards from own endzone to average start — lower is better · longer bar = better field position
UL Monroe Edge
Advanced stats sourced from CFBD · 2021 season · Edges are matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense)
Power Ratings
Team Power Ratings
Overall · Offense · Defense ratings · Updated as season progresses
Kentucky Rated Higher
Overall Power Rating
UL Monroe
-17.8
Kentucky
0.2
Offense Rating
UL Monroe
8.3
Kentucky
16.3
Defense Rating (lower = better defense)
UL Monroe
26.1
Kentucky
16.1
Power ratings updated throughout the season as results accumulate
Momentum Control (CSS)
Consecutive Scoring Sequences Who builds scoring momentum? UL Monroe Edge
Avg sequences created per game
UL Monroe #107
0.00
Kentucky #57
0.00
Avg sequences allowed per game (lower is better)
UL Monroe #129
0.00
Kentucky #64
0.00
UL Monroe +0.00
CSS Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 58.4% of games historically
Based on 0 games this season
Game Control (GC)
Win Probability Dominance Who controls games start to finish? UL Monroe Edge
Avg GC score per game (offense)
UL Monroe #1
0.0
Kentucky #1
0.0
Avg GC score allowed per game (lower is better)
UL Monroe #120
0.0
Kentucky #23
0.0
UL Monroe +0.0
GC Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 50.6% of games historically
Based on 0 games this season
Actual Result
CSS Battle
Kentucky
3 — 0 sequences
✗ Predicted incorrectly
GC Battle
Kentucky
90.9 — 1.4 GC score
✗ Predicted incorrectly
Game Result
Kentucky won by 35
Spread Context
ATS Historical Context
Based on 2021–2025 backtest · FBS vs FBS · Regular season

Both metrics agree on Kentucky, but the GC edge is small. When metrics agree but GC is near-neutral, the agreed-upon team has covered only 46.7% of the time historically (n=224) — potentially a fade signal.

ATS data is informational only. Past cover rates do not guarantee future results.

Coaching Matchup
UL Monroe
Terry Bowden #1
1–1 (50%) · Yr 1 at school
OC Rich Rodriguez Yr 1 #1
DC Zac Alley Yr 1 #1
Staff Rating
0.00 #1
Kentucky
Mark Stoops #1
52–50 (51%) · Yr 9 at school
OC Liam Coen Yr 1 #1
DC Brad White Yr 1 #1
Staff Rating
0.00 #1
About these metrics
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games.

Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: Momentum Control is a great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set.

Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: Game Control is another great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set.

Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself