Matchup Prediction
Tulane
has the edge in this matchup
Both Momentum Control (CSS) and Game Control metrics favor
Tulane entering this game.
Momentum Control
73.7%
Tulane wins
Solid
Game Control
64.9%
Tulane wins
Lean
Vegas Spread
Tulane -14.5
O/U 52.5
DraftKings
Advanced Stats
All 4 factors agree → Tulane
· 83.1% ATS historically when all four align
↓ See full breakdown
Tulane 2025 Schedule
Tulane's 2025 Schedule
| Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 8/30 | Tulane vs Northwestern | -6.5W23–3 | 47.5 | W23–3 | U | Y |
| Sat 9/6 | Tulane at South Alabama | -13.5W33–31 | 51.5 | W33–31 | O | N |
| Sat 9/13 | Tulane vs Duke | -1.5W34–27 | 52.5 | W34–27 | O | Y |
| Sat 9/20 | Tulane at Ole Miss | +12.5L10–45 | 61.5 | L10–45 | U | N |
| Sat 9/27 | Tulane at Tulsa | -14.5W31–14 | 52.5 | W31–14 | U | Y |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Thu 10/9 | Tulane vs East Carolina | -7.0W26–19 | 53.5 | W26–19 | U | N |
| Sat 10/18 | Tulane vs Army | -10.0W24–17 | 44.5 | W24–17 | U | N |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Thu 10/30 | Tulane at UTSA | -5.5L26–48 | 54.5 | L26–48 | O | N |
| Fri 11/7 | Tulane at Memphis | +3.0W38–32 | 53.5 | W38–32 | O | Y |
| Sat 11/15 | Tulane vs Florida Atlantic | -16.5W35–24 | 60.5 | W35–24 | U | N |
| Sat 11/22 | Tulane at Temple | -7.5W37–13 | 54.5 | W37–13 | U | Y |
| Sat 11/29 | Tulane vs Charlotte | -31.5W27–0 | 52.5 | W27–0 | U | N |
| Fri 12/5 | Tulane vs North Texas | +1.5W34–21 | 66.5 | W34–21 | U | Y |
| Sat 12/20 | Tulane at Ole Miss | +17.5L10–41 | 57.5 | L10–41 | U | N |
Tulsa 2025 Schedule
Tulsa's 2025 Schedule
| Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 8/30 | Tulsa vs Abilene Christian | -5.0W35–7 | 59.5 | W35–7 | U | Y |
| Sat 9/6 | Tulsa at New Mexico State | -3.0L14–21 | 52.5 | L14–21 | U | N |
| Sat 9/13 | Tulsa vs Navy | +14.0L23–42 | 52.5 | L23–42 | O | N |
| Fri 9/19 | Tulsa at Oklahoma State | +10.5W19–12 | 54.5 | W19–12 | U | Y |
| Sat 9/27 | Tulsa vs Tulane | +14.5L14–31 | 52.5 | L14–31 | U | N |
| Sat 10/4 | Tulsa at Memphis | +21.0L7–45 | 54.5 | L7–45 | U | N |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Thu 10/16 | Tulsa at East Carolina | +16.5L27–41 | 54.5 | L27–41 | O | Y |
| Sat 10/25 | Tulsa vs Temple | +4.5L37–38 | 52.5 | L37–38 | O | Y |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Sat 11/8 | Tulsa at Florida Atlantic | +4.5L21–40 | 60.5 | L21–40 | O | N |
| Sat 11/15 | Tulsa vs Oregon State | -1.5W31–14 | 50.5 | W31–14 | U | Y |
| Sat 11/22 | Tulsa at Army | +10.0W26–25 | 43.5 | W26–25 | O | Y |
| Sat 11/29 | Tulsa vs UAB | -9.0L24–31 | 56.5 | L24–31 | U | N |
Advanced Stats
Advanced Analytics Matchup
Matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense) ·
2025 season
Agreement Signals — When All Metrics Agree
Elite · 83.1% ATS
PPA + PPO + SR + Havoc
All 4 Agree
→ Tulane
Elite · 82.4% ATS
PPA + PPO + Havoc
3 Agree
→ Tulane
Elite · 73.9% ATS
PPA + Success Rate
Both Agree
→ Tulane
Individual Factors — Ranked by Predictive Strength
PPA Overall
Points added per play · Elite predictor
PPA Passing
Pass efficiency edge · Strong predictor
Havoc Total
Def. disruption rate · Strong predictor
TFLs, sacks, PBUs, forced fumbles — higher is better
Points Per Opp
Drive-finishing edge · Strong predictor
Success Rate
Play consistency edge · Solid predictor
Field Position
Avg start (lower=better) · Solid predictor
Avg yards from own endzone to average start — lower is better · longer bar = better field position
Advanced stats sourced from CFBD · 2025 season ·
Edges are matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense)
Power Ratings
Team Power Ratings
Overall · Offense · Defense ratings · Updated as season progresses
Power ratings updated throughout the season as results accumulate
Momentum Control (CSS)
Consecutive Scoring Sequences
Who builds scoring momentum?
Tulane Edge
Tulane +1.25
CSS Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 73.7% of games historically
Based on 3 games this season
Game Control (GC)
Win Probability Dominance
Who controls games start to finish?
Tulane Edge
Tulane +11.0
GC Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 64.9% of games historically
Based on 4 games this season
Spread Context
ATS Historical Context
Based on 2021–2025 backtest · FBS vs FBS · Regular season
Both metrics agree on Tulane. Teams with this edge profile have covered 50.3% historically — essentially a coin flip against the spread.
ATS data is informational only. Past cover rates do not guarantee future results.
Coaching Matchup
Tulane
Jon Sumrall #1
9–4 (69%)
· Yr 2 at school
OC
Joe Craddock
Yr 2
#1
DC
Greg Gasparato
Yr 2
#1
Tulsa
Tre Lamb #1
0–0 (0%)
· Yr 1 at school
OC
Ty Darlington
Yr 1
#1
DC
Mike Gray
Yr 1
#1
About these metrics
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games. ✓
Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: CSS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: GS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself ✓
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games. ✓
Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: CSS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: GS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself ✓