Sat, Sep 6 2025
·
Week 2
·
🏟 University Stadium
Albuquerque, NM
·
Turf
·
39,224 cap
Idaho State✈ 622 miSame TZ
Preseason projection — This game has not yet been played and 2025 in-season data is not yet available.
Edges are based on 2024 full-season performance.
Confidence will increase once in-season games are logged.
Matchup Prediction
Toss-up — no clear edge
Neither metric shows a meaningful pre-game edge in this matchup.
Momentum Control
58.4%
—
Lean
Game Control
67.1%
New Mexico wins
Solid
Vegas Spread
New Mexico -17.5
O/U 60.0
Bovada
Idaho State 2025 Schedule
Idaho State's 2025 Schedule
| Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 8/23 | Idaho State at UNLV | +30.5L31–38 | 67.0 | L31–38 | O | Y |
| Sat 9/6 | Idaho State at New Mexico | +17.5L22–32 | 60.0 | L22–32 | U | Y |
New Mexico 2025 Schedule
New Mexico's 2025 Schedule
| Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 8/30 | New Mexico at Michigan | +36.5L17–34 | 52.5 | L17–34 | U | Y |
| Sat 9/6 | New Mexico vs Idaho State | -17.5W32–22 | 60.0 | W32–22 | U | N |
| Fri 9/12 | New Mexico at UCLA | +15.5W35–10 | 52.5 | W35–10 | U | Y |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Sat 9/27 | New Mexico vs New Mexico State | -16.5W38–20 | 53.5 | W38–20 | O | Y |
| Fri 10/3 | New Mexico at San José State | +1.5L28–35 | 58.5 | L28–35 | O | N |
| Sat 10/11 | New Mexico at Boise State | +14.5L25–41 | 58.5 | L25–41 | O | N |
| Sat 10/18 | New Mexico vs Nevada | -14.0W24–22 | 49.5 | W24–22 | U | N |
| Sat 10/25 | New Mexico vs Utah State | -3.0W33–14 | 61.5 | W33–14 | U | Y |
| Sat 11/1 | New Mexico at UNLV | +3.5W40–35 | 61.5 | W40–35 | O | Y |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Sat 11/15 | New Mexico vs Colorado State | -15.5W20–17 | 53.5 | W20–17 | U | N |
| Sat 11/22 | New Mexico at Air Force | -3.5W20–3 | 53.5 | W20–3 | U | Y |
| Fri 11/28 | New Mexico vs San Diego State | +1.5W23–17 | 41.5 | W23–17 | U | Y |
| Fri 12/26 | New Mexico vs Minnesota | +1.5L17–20 | 44.5 | L17–20 | U | N |
Momentum Control (CSS)
Consecutive Scoring Sequences
Who builds scoring momentum?
Idaho State Edge
Idaho State +0.00
CSS Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 58.4% of games historically
Based on 2024 full season · preseason estimate
Game Control (GC)
Win Probability Dominance
Who controls games start to finish?
New Mexico Edge
New Mexico +19.5
GC Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 67.1% of games historically
Based on 2024 full season · preseason estimate
About these metrics
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games. ✓
Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: Momentum Control is a great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: Game Control is another great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself ✓
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games. ✓
Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: Momentum Control is a great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: Game Control is another great measure for predicting game outcome but NOT an ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself ✓