Sat, Nov 8 2025
·
Week 11
·
🏟 Camp Randall Stadium
Madison, WI
·
Turf
·
80,321 cap
Washington✈ 1,615 mi+2 hr TZ
Matchup Prediction
Washington
has the edge in this matchup
Both Momentum Control (CSS) and Game Control metrics favor
Washington entering this game.
Momentum Control
73.7%
Washington wins
Solid
Game Control
75.9%
Washington wins
Solid
Vegas Spread
Washington -10.5
O/U 44.5
DraftKings
Advanced Stats
All 4 factors agree → Washington
· 83.1% ATS historically when all four align
↓ See full breakdown
Washington 2025 Schedule
Washington's 2025 Schedule
| Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 8/30 | Washington vs Colorado State | -20.5W38–21 | 52.5 | W38–21 | O | N |
| Sat 9/6 | Washington vs UC Davis | -28.0W70–10 | 54.0 | W70–10 | O | Y |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Sat 9/20 | Washington at Washington State | -21.0W59–24 | 51.5 | W59–24 | O | Y |
| Sat 9/27 | Washington vs Ohio State | +9.5L6–24 | 52.5 | L6–24 | U | N |
| Sat 10/4 | Washington at Maryland | -5.5W24–20 | 52.5 | W24–20 | U | N |
| Fri 10/10 | Washington vs Rutgers | -9.5W38–19 | 62.5 | W38–19 | U | Y |
| Sat 10/18 | Washington at Michigan | +4.5L7–24 | 50.5 | L7–24 | U | N |
| Sat 10/25 | Washington vs Illinois | -3.5W42–25 | 54.5 | W42–25 | O | Y |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Sat 11/8 | Washington at Wisconsin | -10.5L10–13 | 44.5 | L10–13 | U | N |
| Sat 11/15 | Washington vs Purdue | -14.5W49–13 | 51.5 | W49–13 | O | Y |
| Sat 11/22 | Washington at UCLA | -10.5W48–14 | 51.5 | W48–14 | O | Y |
| Sat 11/29 | Washington vs Oregon | +6.5L14–26 | 51.5 | L14–26 | U | N |
| Sat 12/13 | Washington vs Boise State | -9.5W38–10 | 55.5 | W38–10 | U | Y |
Wisconsin 2025 Schedule
Wisconsin's 2025 Schedule
| Date | Matchup | Spread | Total | Result | O/U | Cover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 8/28 | Wisconsin vs Miami (OH) | -17.5W17–0 | 40.5 | W17–0 | U | N |
| Sat 9/6 | Wisconsin vs Middle Tennessee | -28.5W42–10 | 45.5 | W42–10 | O | Y |
| Sat 9/13 | Wisconsin at Alabama | +17.5L14–38 | 45.5 | L14–38 | O | N |
| Sat 9/20 | Wisconsin vs Maryland | -10.5L10–27 | 44.5 | L10–27 | U | N |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Sat 10/4 | Wisconsin at Michigan | +17.5L10–24 | 42.5 | L10–24 | U | Y |
| Sat 10/11 | Wisconsin vs Iowa | +5.5L0–37 | 37.5 | L0–37 | U | N |
| Sat 10/18 | Wisconsin vs Ohio State | +24.5L0–34 | 41.5 | L0–34 | U | N |
| Sat 10/25 | Wisconsin at Oregon | +31.5L7–21 | 44.5 | L7–21 | U | Y |
| — Bye Week — | ||||||
| Sat 11/8 | Wisconsin vs Washington | +10.5W13–10 | 44.5 | W13–10 | U | Y |
| Sat 11/15 | Wisconsin at Indiana | +28.5L7–31 | 43.5 | L7–31 | U | Y |
| Sat 11/22 | Wisconsin vs Illinois | +8.5W27–10 | 42.5 | W27–10 | U | Y |
| Sat 11/29 | Wisconsin at Minnesota | -2.5L7–17 | 38.5 | L7–17 | U | N |
Advanced Stats
Advanced Analytics Matchup
Matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense) ·
2025 season
Agreement Signals — When All Metrics Agree
Elite · 83.1% ATS
PPA + PPO + SR + Havoc
All 4 Agree
→ Washington
Elite · 82.4% ATS
PPA + PPO + Havoc
3 Agree
→ Washington
Elite · 73.9% ATS
PPA + Success Rate
Both Agree
→ Washington
Individual Factors — Ranked by Predictive Strength
PPA Overall
Points added per play · Elite predictor
PPA Passing
Pass efficiency edge · Strong predictor
Havoc Total
Def. disruption rate · Strong predictor
TFLs, sacks, PBUs, forced fumbles — higher is better
Points Per Opp
Drive-finishing edge · Strong predictor
Success Rate
Play consistency edge · Solid predictor
Field Position
Avg start (lower=better) · Solid predictor
Avg yards from own endzone to average start — lower is better · longer bar = better field position
Advanced stats sourced from CFBD · 2025 season ·
Edges are matchup-adjusted (offense vs opponent defense)
Power Ratings
Team Power Ratings
Overall · Offense · Defense ratings · Updated as season progresses
Power ratings updated throughout the season as results accumulate
Momentum Control (CSS)
Consecutive Scoring Sequences
Who builds scoring momentum?
Washington Edge
Washington +1.43
CSS Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 73.7% of games historically
Based on 8 games this season
Game Control (GC)
Win Probability Dominance
Who controls games start to finish?
Washington Edge
Washington +31.3
GC Edge (season-to-date)
Teams with this edge win 75.9% of games historically
Based on 8 games this season
Actual Result
CSS Battle
Tie
1 — 1 sequences
✗ Predicted incorrectly
GC Battle
Wisconsin
38.1 — 32.6 GC score
✗ Predicted incorrectly
Game Result
Wisconsin won by 3
✗ Model missed it
Spread Context
ATS Historical Context
Based on 2021–2025 backtest · FBS vs FBS · Regular season
Both metrics agree on Washington with a large edge. Historically, dominant teams like this are fully priced into the spread — the agreed-upon team covers just 50.2% of the time. The metrics predict game control better than they beat the number.
ATS data is informational only. Past cover rates do not guarantee future results.
Coaching Matchup
Washington
Jedd Fisch #1
6–6 (50%)
· Yr 2 at school
OC
Jimmie Dougherty
Yr 1
#1
DC
Ryan Walters
Yr 1
#1
Wisconsin
Luke Fickell #1
13–13 (50%)
· Yr 3 at school
OC
Jeff Grimes
Yr 1
#1
DC
Mike Tressel
Yr 2
#1
About these metrics
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games. ✓
Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: CSS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: GS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself ✓
Advanced Stats shows matchup-adjusted factor edges (offense vs opponent defense). Combination signals — when PPA, PPO, Success Rate, and Havoc all point the same direction — have historically predicted the SU winner in 95–97% of games and the ATS winner in 82–83% of games (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS, regular season).
Impact: Advanced Stats are the best performance based metric used to predict the outcome of games. ✓
Momentum Control (CSS) measures consecutive scoring sequences — when a team scores, holds the opponent scoreless, then scores again. Teams entering a game with a CSS edge of +1.0 or more have won 71–78% of games historically (2021–2025, FBS vs FBS).
Impact: CSS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Game Control (GC) measures win probability dominance — how thoroughly a team controlled the game from start to finish. Teams with a GC edge of +12 or more have won 67–76% of games historically. When both metrics agree, combined confidence is higher. When they split, treat as a lean at best.
Impact: GS is not a predictive ATS advantage, data shows this is already considered when lines are set. ✗
Power Ratings are a custom-built composite of a Teams Talent, Experience & Production, Coaching & Performance Metrics. These are updated constantly with roster changes, performance once the games start for the 2026 season, injuries the team is dealing with and scheduling situations.
Impact: There are a wide range of power ratings available, we think ours is the best, you can decide for yourself ✓